{"id":1449,"date":"2010-12-25T11:59:24","date_gmt":"2010-12-25T16:59:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/redeeminggod.com\/?p=1449"},"modified":"2013-12-21T19:14:29","modified_gmt":"2013-12-22T03:14:29","slug":"happy-mithras-day","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/redeeminggod.com\/happy-mithras-day\/","title":{"rendered":"Merry Mithras"},"content":{"rendered":"
On Easter I wrote a post called Happy Sex Goddess Day<\/a>. The post showed that the\u00a0name “Easter” really came from Ishtar, the sex goddess, but through the \u00a0process of cultural redemption, nobody thinks of Ishtar on this day anymore, but of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. The post was somewhat controversial on my Facebook page<\/a>, and even had a professor\u00a0from my former seminary weigh in.<\/p>\n So this Christmas season, I’m wishing all of you “Merry Mithras!” Whether you realize it or not, Jesus was probably not actually born on December 25<\/a>. Historically, December 25 was a day to celebrate the god Mithras and his connection with winter solstice<\/a>. But again, through the process of cultural redemption, few people think of Mithras on December 25. Instead, it is a day to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n But here is an additional point I want to make. One of the guys I meet with in my church planting Bible study<\/a>, the one who is agnostic, reminded us all on Thursday as we were reading Matthew 2, that all of this was just plagiarized from pagan myths of Osiris and Mithras.\u00a0\u00a0None of it really happened. It wasn’t the time or place for me to attempt to “correct” him, because after all, we agreed to not argue and debate with each other.<\/p>\n But I can post my thoughts on this blog as I made no such agreement with you.<\/p>\n Several years ago, I wrote a post about an online movie called Zeitgeist: The Movie.<\/a> A pantheistic friend of mine asked me to watch it.<\/p>\n The basic premise of the movie (the first half anyway), is that the biblical accounts of the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus were all plagiarized from ancient myths about Osiris, Dionysus, Adonis, and Attis. The movie claims, among other things, that some of these myths\u00a0are about\u00a0people who were born of a virgin on December 25, had twelve followers, performed miracles, died, and rose again. As a result, it is argued, the story of Jesus is just a myth also.<\/p>\n I\u2019ve done a lot of thinking about this since I first made that post, and have come to this conclusion:<\/p>\n First, I have done some reading into the myths of Osiris, Dionysus, and some of the other mythical parallels, and to be honest, I can\u2019t find many of the matching details that supposedly exist. It is claimed, for example, that Mithras was born of a virgin on December 25. Well, he was born on December 25, but he came out of rock, not a woman. Coming from a rock is quite different than being born of a virgin.<\/p>\n Furthermore, though we celebrate the birth of Jesus on December 25, few people believe he was actually born this day, nor does the Bible ever say that this is the day of His birth. The parallel is contrived.<\/p>\n So before someone begins doubting the accuracy of the Gospel accounts of Jesus based on some supposed parallels to ancient Persian, Greek, and Egyptian mythology, it would probably be wise to check the facts on the ancient mythology.<\/p>\n Second, it might also be wise to check the historical chronology of some of these myths. Take Mithras as an example. Sure, there are some striking similarities between Mithras worship and early Christian worship. See this site<\/a> for some of these. But by digging a little deeper, you discover that the Roman cult of Mithras\u00a0probably didn’t develop until the late First Century A.D.<\/p>\n Yes, that’s right, the events of the Gospels happened first.<\/em> The early Christian apologist, Justin Martyr accused members of the Mithras cult of stealing the beliefs and practices of Christianity for their own religion! So who plagiarized whom?<\/p>\n But let\u2019s give these myths the benefit of the doubt. Let\u2019s say the parallels really do exist, and let’s say that they really do predate the Gospel accounts. Does this mean that the accounts of Jesus should now be considered myth?<\/p>\n You can answer this question by googling your name. Go ahead. When I googled \u201cJeremy Myers\u201d I found that there are several other people alive today with the name \u201cJeremy Myers.\u201d A few of them even have some similarities to me… similar age, similar interests, etc. I didn\u2019t research any of them in depth, but if I could sit down with some of them, I\u2019m sure we would discover some striking similarities. Does this mean that some or all of us are myths? All of us (if Google can be trusted) are real, living, breathing, human beings. Imagine trying to argue that because there is more than one \u201cJeremy Myers,\u201d and we share some striking similarities, we are all mythical.<\/p>\n Or let me approach this another way. Did you ever hear the story of a fancy ship that ran into an iceberg on its maiden voyage and sank as a result, killing more than half of the people on board because there were not enough lifeboats? No, I\u2019m not talking about the Titanic. The name of the ship was the Titan, and this was the plot of a fictional novel called Futility: the Wreck of the Titan<\/a><\/em>, which was written by Morgan Robinson in 1898, fourteen years before the historical events of the Titanic. Can we say that since Morgan Robinson\u2019s fictional story has so many striking parallels to the events of the Titanic, that the sinking of the Titanic must also be fiction?<\/p>\n Of course not. But this is the argument used to discredit the historical account of Jesus.<\/p>\n If you don\u2019t believe the events in the Gospels really happened, you should have better reasons than the (questionable) idea that since the Gospels contain parallels to ancient myths, the Gospels must also be myths. To believe or disbelieve the historical accuracy of the Gospels, you must study them on the strength of their own historical evidence, not because of their real (or supposed) parallels to pagan myths<\/a>. I, for one, believe that the Gospels contain some of the most accurate and reliable history ever written.<\/p>\n I believe that Jesus truly was born (maybe not on December 25<\/a>, but does it really matter?), lived, taught, died on the cross, and rose again, just as the Gospel accounts say.<\/p>\n And that’s part of the reason I can wish you, and everybody I meet, “Merry Christmas!”<\/p>\nPagan Roots of Christmas<\/h2>\n
Pagan Roots of Christianity<\/h2>\n
Defending Christianity<\/h2>\n
The Myth of You<\/h2>\n
The Titanic Myth<\/h2>\n