{"id":6243,"date":"2011-08-21T12:31:14","date_gmt":"2011-08-21T16:31:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/redeeminggod.com\/?p=6243"},"modified":"2011-08-21T21:06:27","modified_gmt":"2011-08-22T01:06:27","slug":"sola-scriptura","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/redeeminggod.com\/sola-scriptura\/","title":{"rendered":"You Don’t Believe in Sola Scriptura"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Reformers were opposed to many abuses within the church, and believed that most of these abuses stemmed from the Catholic Church’s reliance upon tradition for their beliefs, practices, and understanding of Scripture. The Reformers, in trying to correct these abuses, tried to reject tradition and return to the Sola Scriptura,<\/em>“the Bible alone.”<\/p>\n <\/p>\n It’s too bad such a move was impossible.<\/p>\n Yes, Sola Scriptura, <\/em>or “the Bible alone” is an impossible belief. It is doomed from the start. It cannot be held. It cannot be practiced. It cannot be believed. Even if you or your church claims to believe in Sola Scriptura, <\/em>you actually don’t.<\/p>\n Why not? Because in every area of the Bible, from the writing of the text, to the collection of the books, to the transmission, translation, and teaching of the text, extra-biblical tradition and authority is required. The biblical authors themselves did not write from a Sola Scriptura <\/em>perspective. They often appealed to various beliefs, traditions, and customs which are not found in Scripture to support the argument they make in their writings.<\/p>\n If we want to believe and understand what these authors are saying, then to some degree, we must also believe and understand the extra-biblical beliefs, traditions, and customs which the biblical authors mention.<\/p>\n Even the Bible itself, as we have it today, is largely a product of tradition and church authority. In fact, if it were not for church tradition and authority, we would not have the 27 books of the New Testament at all.<\/p>\n We learned in a previous post about the Canonization of Scripture<\/a>, that in 397 AD, some of the church leaders decided which books to include in the New Testament. And one of the criteria they used to help make this decision was the tradition of the church up to that time. If we reject church tradition, we end up rejecting the Bible which church tradition has given to us.<\/p>\n Unless one wants to limit Sola Scriptura <\/em>to the original manuscripts themselves (which I have never heard of anyone doing, because such a move would make the Bible completely useless for us today), the Greek and Hebrew manuscripts we have today are the result of 2000 years of church tradition.<\/p>\n
\nA large segment of Christianity holds to Sola Scriptura, <\/em>which is typically defined as the\u00a0belief that the Bible alone is the final authority for all things related to faith and practice. This view is taught in many Bible colleges and seminaries, and we are taught that it was one of the central battle cries of the Reformation. Holding to Sola Scriptura, <\/em>men like\u00a0Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Ulrich Zwingli led the charge against the Roman Catholic Church.<\/p>\nSola Scriptura <\/em>is Impossible<\/h2>\n
\n<\/p>\nThe Authors Used Tradition<\/h2>\n
Selecting the Books of the Bible Used Tradition<\/h2>\n
Copying the Bible Used Tradition<\/h2>\n