Redeeming God

Liberating you from bad ideas about God

Learn the MOST ESSENTIAL truths for following Jesus.

Get FREE articles and audio teachings in my discipleship emails!


  • Join Us!
  • Scripture
  • Theology
  • My Books
  • About
  • Discipleship
  • Courses
    • What is Hell?
    • Skeleton Church
    • The Gospel According to Scripture
    • The Gospel Dictionary
    • The Re-Justification of God
    • What is Prayer?
    • Adventures in Fishing for Men
    • What are the Spiritual Gifts?
    • How to Study the Bible
    • Courses FAQ
  • Forum
    • Introduce Yourself
    • Old Testament
    • New Testament
    • Theology Questions
    • Life & Ministry
You are here: Home / Archives

Angry at God?

By Jeremy Myers
1 Comment

Here is something someone wrote to me recently. There are some great thoughts, great questions, and amazing insights. She is the wisest woman I know.

The lastย three years have been the hardest to comprehend. Why does it have to be so hard to follow Christ? Why do we have to be so badly broken to understand who He is? Why does it have to hurt in order to make sense? Why do we need to get totally lost before we can begin our trek home? Why must we get so mad at the very one who encompasses love?

2005-2008 was my journey of discovering these questions. Noticeย I said “questions” and not answers. The answersย I believe are coming slowly and will continue to come asย I try to understand just who God is.

Honestly,ย I actually have more respect for Him now thanย I did when I saw Him as only this great loving God who sent His Son to dieย for me. Nowย I see Him as much more complex than before. Answers are not just black and white. What seems best isn’t usually really best because His plan for us is beyond what we think as complex. He sees our souls, hearts. We can’t even begin to understand what that means.

But whatย I do know is what He has done to me through all of this pain, hurt, anger, and frustration. He has opened my eyes to what he wants His church to be, me to be, and who He is.

He really can change our life overnight, for the worse or better. But even the worse in the end is for His glory still.

If you have never gone through a time of being totally mad and angry at Godย I suggest you need to allow yourself the opportunity.ย I know that most Christians will say this is bad or unchristian or blasphamous, butย I disagree. I think if you allow yourself to be honest enough with yourself to be honest with God, then you will awaken a part of you that God is trying to get through to.

So take off the mask of churchgoer and take a serious look at who church says that god is. If that God doesn’t satisfy you, get honest with yourself and God, get angry, get mad and cry out.ย Let Him show you who He really is.

Nowย I caution you, this will HURT immensly. Try to see it as heart surgery without the anesthesia (Yes, that bad). And it will last different lengths for all of us, but the healing process is incredible (Andย I have only just begun).

You will see His love for you in so many new ways and you’ll never look and HIm the same again. and you just may be able to sing those cheesy Christian worship songs and mean it (OK, maybeย not the cheesy ones). But only because He is so much greater than those songs can even begin to describe.

God is complex and His way is not the easy way. But it is rewarding, even if it only feels like that one week every three years.

So anyways here is my heart summing up what God is teaching me, what do you think?

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Discipleship

Gay Love

By Jeremy Myers
8 Comments

Imagine that you are a parent of a teenage son, and one day he comes home from school and blurts out, โ€œIโ€™ve started doing drugs. Am I going to hell?โ€

How do you answer?

What if he said, โ€œA few years ago, someone at school gave me a Playboy, and I been masturbating to it several times a week. Am I going to hell?โ€

Or, โ€œMy girlfriend and I have been having sleeping together for about three months now. Am I going to hell?โ€

Most Christian parents, I think, would rightfully be alarmed at such confessions, but few would tell their son that he was going to hell. Most parents would seek to help him through these

But what instead, your son said, โ€œFor a few years now Iโ€™ve been attracted to other guys, and over the last few months, Iโ€™ve started having sex with another guy at school. We love each other very much. But someone told me today that unless I change, Iโ€™m going to hell. Are they right?โ€

Now how do you answer?

Most evangelical Christians, when confronted with this hypothetical scenario, respond by saying, โ€œOh, that would never happen with my son. You see, he had involved father, a mother who wasnโ€™t domineering, and he was never sexually abused as a child. Studies prove that most gay men have had at least one of these things happen to them.โ€

This, of course, is not an explanation of how you would respond if your son โ€œcame outโ€ to you, but is rather a denial of its possibility. It is a non-answer.

Which is why, I suppose, most Christian families are shocked and completely unprepared when such situations do happen to them. We have been caught unaware and unprepared. We never thought it would happen to us, and so we didnโ€™t think about what we should do or say if and when it did.

However, in a world that increasingly welcomes and accepts those of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transsexual (LGBT) orientation, Christians must open their eyes and ears to what LGBT people are saying about God, the Scriptures, the church, and human sexuality. This is especially true if we want to minister among them.

Furthermore, the LGBT issue is increasingly being brought up on television and in politics. Numerousย states are passing laws legalizing same-sex marriage. Therefore, it is vitally important for Christians to know how to respond to these situations, not only in truth, but also in love.

Andrew Marin is one Christian who is pioneering the way.

In his newly released book, Love is an Orientation (IVP, 2009), Andrew Marin provides an excellent overview of the absolute necessityย for Christians to build bridges to those people who are in the LGBT community. As Christ took the initiative and came to us, we must take the initiative in building bridges of hope and love to others.

Thankfully, Andrew Marinย is not writing theoretically, but from yeas of experience from living among the LGBT community as the โ€œgayest straight person in the world.โ€

The book provides excellent insights and guidelines for working alongside and developing relationships with people in the LGBT community. For example, Andrew advises the four of the most important things Christians can do are (1) love, (2) listen, (3) don’t judge, and (4) seek friendship and conversation. Also, he recommends we stop saying “Love the sinner; hate the sin” and referring to those in the LGBT community as “homosexuals.” Both, he explains, are derogatory.

One helpful feature of the book is the answers to the five main questions that are on the minds of most Christians.ย The questions are:

  1. Do you think that gays and lesbians are born that way?
  2. Do you think homosexuality is a sin?
  3. Can a LGBT person change?
  4. Do you think that someone can be gay and a Christian?
  5. Are LGBT people going to hell?

I imagine that as you read this short review, one or two of these questions crossed your mindย as well. I believe that Marin provided some excellent answers to these questions in his book. Sadly, I don’t have room to reproduce the answers here…so I guess you’ll just have to buy and read the book for yourself.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Discipleship, Theology of the Church

What if… (Part 5)

By Jeremy Myers
1 Comment

This post concludes my “What if…” series. I am sure I will have more questions in the future as I try to seek answers to those already asked, but that’s what this processย of reimagining church is all about.

I know that most of these questions will come back to haunt me in the future….

What if Prayer were different?

What if when we prayed for something, we concluded every prayer by asking, โ€œHow can we ourselves be an answer to our prayer?โ€

What if we didn’t feel the need to bow our heads, close our eyes, and fold our hands when we pray?

What if prayer was more like a conversation with God than a strange, wordy, repetitiveย incantation?

What if we stopped saying “Father” after every phrase? (I thank you, Father, for this beautiful day, Father, and for the opportunity to be here, Father….). He knows we’re talking to Him. He doesn’t need the constant reminder.

What if we didn’t backtrack on our prayers of faith with the statement “…if it’s your will”? (I know Jesus prayed this way once, but that’s a subject for a different study.)ย 

What if we stopped using prayer as an excuse forย gossip?

What if strategies for getting money were different?

What if we didnโ€™t pass tithe plates?

What if,ย when someone wanted to give a large sum of money to the church, we had them sign a document saying that they understood this did not entitle them to any sort of recognition in the church, or any power or say over where/how the money was used?

What if we didn’t take “special offerings” multiple times until we got the amount we were “praying” for?

What if weย didn’t pressure people into giving “10%” (which is a misunderstanding and misapplication of the Old Testament principle of tithing)?

What if fellowship were different?

What if believers actually cared for each other?

What if we wanted to spend time together? How would we encourage this to happen?

What if we were more interested in loving and serving each other than in being served?ย ย But HOW?

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Discipleship, Theology of the Church

What if… (Part 4)

By Jeremy Myers
4 Comments

One big issue with church today is where, when, and how we meet. So as we think about reinventing church, there are several questions that need to be asked.

What if the meeting times, places, and format were different?

What if the best time for a church to meet is not on Sunday morning?

What if the best place to meet is not in a building?

What if the best format is not song, announcements, songs, prayer, sermon?

What if believers realized that church has nothing to do with the building on the corner?

What if we didnโ€™t have the financial black hole of a building?

What if when we had โ€œserviceโ€ we actually did some service?

What if our only โ€œserviceโ€ of the week was service? (Meet. Eat. Teach. Serve.)

Ministries
What if we started ministries based on what spiritual gifts were present in the church, not based on what the church down the street was doing?

What if we didnโ€™t feel like we had to offer all things to all people?

What if we had fewer ministries, and did not expect people to be involved or present in all of them?

Church Planting
What if our goal for church planting wasnโ€™t to plant churches, but to make disciples?

What if our goal wasnโ€™t to get a crowd together, but to change the world, to turn the world upside down?

What if our way of โ€œdoing churchโ€ was so simple, basic, memorable, easy, reproducible, that anybody could do it, no matter how long they have been a Christian, or how much they know, or how much training they donโ€™t have?

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Discipleship, Theology of the Church

What if… (Part 3)

By Jeremy Myers
7 Comments

Here is Part 3 of my imaginations about ways to reinvent church. This post deals with leadership in the church. I know that various congregations around the country are already practicing several of these ideas, and so there is really not much new here.

What if leadership structure, requirements, and functions were different?

What if we didnโ€™t promote people into leadership just because they had letters after their name, or lots of donations in the tithe plate?

What if elderโ€™s meetings were more about prayer for the people and ministries of the church than discussing the myriad and minute problems and issues of the church?

What if leaders didn’t have to “dress up” in order to show they were the leaders?

What if, when a new person visited our gathering, it wasn’t immediately obvious who the leader was? Would this be possible?

What if decisions were made, not based on what other churches or doing, not based on what the church has always done, not based on what the numerous church policies say, but instead only made after people had sought the truth of God through Scripture, the timing of God through prayer, and the leading of God through reliance on the Holy Spirit?

What if leaders were chosen, not based on who gave the most money, who was the most vocal complainer or critic, who had been at the church the longest, but on the spiritual characteristics of humility, teachability, servant hearted, and had respect for authority?

What if we didnโ€™t have committees?

What if people didnโ€™t need permission from the pastor or a committee to go serve and meet a need?

What if leaders were chosen from within the current fellowship, rather than being recruited or hired from outside?

What if all local churches were autonomous…meaning they were not part of a denomination?

What if all local churches were part of a denomination?

———-

Feel free to answer these below or provide questions of your own.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Theology of the Church

What if… (Part 2)

By Jeremy Myers
3 Comments

Reinventing church requires looking at all that we are and all that we do and asking ourselves, “Is this biblical? Is this the best way of accomplishing what the church is supposed to be and do? Is there a better way?” One key area that such questions need to be asked is in the area of Outreach and Evangelism. (You’ll see by the way I’ve worded some of the questions below that I feel very strongly about this issue.)

What if Outreach, Evangelism and Missionsย were different?

What if the pastor was not seen as the one who does the evangelism through his sermon?

What if evangelism wasn’t often defined simply as “inviting someone to church for a special event or to hear a special speaker”?

What if the people in church viewed themselves first and foremost as missionaries? How could pastors help them develop this paradigm shift?

What if we viewed supporting missionaries as more important than building a new building or upgrading our existing one?

What is “mission” anyway? Who are “the missionaries”?

What if all our people knew how to share the message of eternal life?

What if there was more to evangelism than simply sharing the message of eternal life (or the four spiritual laws, the Romans Road, or whatever)?

What if we donโ€™t have โ€œevangelism eventsโ€ but instead trained people to simply love others?

What if we didnโ€™t have โ€œrevivalsโ€ but instead focused on 1-to-1 discipleship?

What if we stopped praying for revivals and the “evangelization of the lost” and actually went across the street and served somebody?

What if we stopped trying to plan and program our own “serve the community” events, and just joined in the events which the community was already doing? (For ideas, go look at the bulletin board in the Town Hall or the Supermarket. Call the Courthouse, the Fire Department, or the Police. Contact your mayor for a list of events.)

What if evangelism took place in peopleโ€™s homes as we invite them over to our houses, and us to theirs?

What if we showed as much grace toward believers and unbelievers as God shows toward us?

What if evangelism was just as much about right living as it is about right believing?

Would more people want to become followers of Jesus if we lived life with more joy, laughter, love, patience, kindness, and gentleness?

What if we didn’t care about people using profanity in our presence, or if they smelled of alcohol and cigarettes?

What if, rather than trying to impress our views upon other people, we tried to learn about their views instead, and asked them what they believed?

What if, rather than trying to get people to act like us, talk like us, look like us as soon as they “get saved”ย we let the Holy Spirit work in them at their (and His) own pace?

What if we stopped saying “Praise God” and “God Bless You” at the end of every sentence?

What if we stopped telling people “I’ll pray for you” and tried to help them instead?

What if, instead of practicing “apologetic evangelism” where we are always trying to defend the faith against the heresies of the heathen, we loved people and served people?ย 

What if we let people get involved in church who weren’t sure yet what they believed about Jesus or God?

What if evangelism and discipleship were the same thing?

What if we didn’t focus so much on evangelism, but on discipleship?

What if the gospel was more than just a set of doctrines, but an all-encompassing claim on life?

What if nearly everything in life could be redeemed for discipleship?

What if we stopped using Christian music, Christian movies, Christian literature and started watching and reading the same things that our neighbors and coworkers are?

What if, instead of starting Christian Coffee Houses, Christian Work-Out Centers,ย andย Christian Bridge Clubs, we started just going to these places that were already in our community and meeting the people who go there?

What if we stopped “having church” in our Christian buildings, and instead went down to the local beach, or the local restaurant, or the local bar?

—————

Feel free to provide your own questions in the comment section below.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Discipleship

What if… (Part 1)

By Jeremy Myers
8 Comments

Following the theme of my last post, I want to take several posts and simply raise questions. You don’t reinvent the wheel by setting out to reinvent the wheel. The first step is to simply raise questions about the current model, and dream about what could be.ย In the next few posts, I will share someย of the questions I have been asking myself.

Since in years past, I saw “preaching” as the central function of the church, I will begin by questioning it. Please understand that my questions are NOT statements of what should be, but simply “What if?” questions…what would happen if…?

What if Preaching and Teachingย were Different?

What if we didn’t preach…at all? This is near heresy for some of us (it was for me a few years ago), but really, what would happen? I imagine at first, all those people who are used to showing up on Sunday to hear a 45 minute sermon would sit around staring at each other, asking, “What are we supposed to do now?” Exactly. If we didn’t spend 30-45 minutes on a Sunday with the sermon, what would we do instead? On a related note, what if we stopped telling people how important it is for them to read the Bible daily? It wasn’t until about 500 years ago that people even had the option, and even then, it wasn’t until about 100 years ago that there was widespread literacy. I’m not suggesting we jettison preaching and Bible reading from our churches. The opposite in fact. But I wonder what would happen in our churches if we fasted from gorging ourselves on Scripture for a while?

What if, when weย did preach, instead ofย trying to beย funny and cute in three easy-to-remember points,ย we simplyย taught the Word of God? What if we didn’tย maskย what we were doingย by changing a book series into a topical series (calling Preaching through Psalms, โ€œHow to Praise God.โ€), or trying to be more โ€œrelevantโ€ by speaking to peopleโ€™s needs, or mask that we preaching a text by giving lots of illustrations, stories, and images? What if we just said, “Today we going to study Ephesians 1:1-10.” What if, in doing so, we taught as long as it took to adequately explain the text, whether 10 minutes or two hours? Would this be a wise use of time? Would this be an effective way to teach Scripture? Who would it be for? All people or just some? Who gets to decide what “adequately explain the text” means?

What if we didnโ€™t apologize for biblical terminology, but used it and explained it? Are simpler translations of Scripture actually better? Or do they tend to dumb us down?

What if the preaching/teaching was more dialogue/interactive than monologue? Would this depend on group size?

What if we used movies and art and music to teach from, and bridges with culture to direct us to Scripture? What if instead of condemning movies and art and music, we looked for ways to redeem them?

What if the teaching and preaching was not done only by those with seminary degrees and formal education? Who else would do it?

What if we stopped trying to make sure a person was “orthodox” (by our standards) before we let them teach? If the argument is that we need to protect our churches from false teaching, just look at our churches. Can we honestly say thatย preaching and teaching only by the “seminar-trained and ordained” has kept false teaching at bay? Would allowing “untrained lay persons” the opportunity to teachย really introduce heresy (by our definition) or would it open up more streams for dialogue? Would doing this be too dangerous in some settings? Would it make a difference if the teaching setting was set up as a dialogue instead of a monologue?

What if, after every time we opened the Bible to read and study it, we wouldnโ€™t move on until we had asked โ€œWhat is this passage telling us to do, and how can we as a church do it?โ€ What if we didn’t move on to the next passage until, as a community, we obeyed the first passage? Week 1: Teach. Week 2: Obey. What if obedience and service were built in to the teaching aspect of the church?

What if, as we taught, we added humility to everything we said? Everything. What if, rather than say, “This is the way it is” we said, “This is my current understanding”? Do people really learn better from teachers who are certain of their beliefs, or do all the conflicting certainties from various teachers just confuse them further?

What if we refused to draw lines of orthodoxyย about which people were in and which people were out?

What if in our teaching,ย we refused to judge a group of people unless/until we actually were friends with some people from that group? Would this keep us from judging them? Is that wise?

————————

Feel free to offer suggestions to the questions above, or to ask a few questions of your own below.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Discipleship, Theology - General, Theology of the Church

What Goes Around…is Better

By Jeremy Myers
4 Comments

When it comes to church, I can’t tell you how often I’ve heard people tell me, “Don’t reinvent the wheel.”

I imagine back in cave-man history when they had square wheels, a certain cavemanโ€” we’ll call him Firestoneโ€”noticed that square wheels didn’t roll too well, and so started asking some “What if” questions. His first was probably, “Square wheels are easy to make, but those corners sure cause problems. What if we rounded them off?”

Probably the other cavemen came around and, through a series of grunts and club beatings, told Firestone, “Don’t reinvent the wheel.” He especially got grief from the wheel cutters, because they had been making wheels like this since their great, great grandfathers developedย opposable thumbs. “Besides,” the stone cutters said, “if we have to round off the corners, it will take us a lot more time to make wheels. Right now, we can cut two square wheels a day. If we have to round off the corners, we can onlyย make one wheel a day.”

For a while, Firestone was a little discouraged. But then one day, he came across a wheel cutter named Michelin who shared similar ideas. They sat for long hours into the night, talking about round wheels, and that even if it took longer to cut round wheels, it would save everybody a lot of time, because now the wheels could actually be used. “Whyย doesn’t everybody see this?” they wondered.

So one day, they stopped talking about it, and actually made a round wheel. At first, people made fun of them. Firestone and Michelin were scoffed at and ridiculed. “A round wheel,” they were told, “doesn’t look right on a square cart.” But then people noticed that the carts were actually moving and transporting things, and so the criticismย shifted.ย “All that rolling,” they were told, “will cause the wheel to crack. Square wheels are better because they don’t roll, and so don’t crack.”

But Firestone and Michelin just kept making round wheels. After a while, they even had a few disagreements with each other on how to make the best wheel, and so agreed to go their separate ways. At first, the naysayers cheered, and said things like, “I won’t say ‘I told you so'” even though “I told you so” was exactly what they were saying. However, wheel production actually increased. Instead of oneย group making round wheels, there were now two. And the competition caused both cutters toย continually refine and redesign their wheels.

Today, both Firestone and Michelin continue to “reinvent” the wheel, adding treading that sloughs off rain, traction that handles curves better, and studs for driving on ice and snow. A day may come when they will reinvent the wheel again, so that all of us can do life faster, smoother, and more efficiently. Maybe, eventually, they will get rid of wheels altogether, and we will ride on air.

I want to reinvent church. Why? A lot of it has become square and isn’t going anywhere. People come week after week, and work, and serve, and sweat, and teach, and give, and pray, and the church doesn’t go anywhere. There’s lots of lights and big, white-toothed smiles, warm handshakes, and media glitz, but the people aren’t going anywhere.

Don’t reinvent the wheel? Sorry. It needs to be reinvented.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Discipleship, Theology of the Church

Adventures in Missing the Point

By Jeremy Myers
7 Comments

Adventures in Missing the Point

I just finished reading a book by Brian McLaren.

Yes, yes, I know. Many of my old friends and acquaintances have long thought that I was sliding into apostasy, and nowย their suspicions are confirmed.

So since there is no chance of persuading them otherwise, let me go further and make another confession: I not only read the book; I enjoyed it.

Brian McLarenAs long as I’m making confessions (this feels good to get some of this off my chest), I might as well come out with all of it. I read the book, I enjoyed the book, and (gasp) I agreed with much of what McLaren said!

I even cried at one point, and reread the chapter – out loud – to my wife!

Oh, and I guess that leads me to another confession, this one directed to Brian. I am sorry that in the past, I condemned you and your writings as “heresy” without ever actually reading or listening to anything you wrote or said, or trying to understand your views. That was wrong of me. I am planning on obtaining and reading more of your books, because even though I may not agree with everything, I like to read books that challenge me to think. Your books certainly do that.

Adventures in Missing the PointThe book I read was Adventures in Missing the Pointby Brian McLaren and Tony Campolo. The book contains individual chapters on various topics, such as salvation, the Bible, evangelism, seminary, homosexuality, environmentalism, worship, sin, and postmodernism.ย Brian and Tony argue that many of us Christians approach these topics in the wrong way, and are therefore neutering the gospel of much of it’s redemptive power.

Aside from the fact that the book makes you think about these topics, one nice feature of the book is that the authors give you permission to disagree with them. They want the reader to think through the traditional views on these topics in a new light, so that we hold our views more lightly, with humility and grace. They help the reader do this through the format of the book. Each topic is assigned to one author, but the chapter concludes with a response from the other author. On nearly every topic, the two authors disagree with each other in some way, but they do so with gentleness and respect.

Christians are never going to universally agree on how to approach the “hot topics.” Personally, I am not sure that in this life, 100% agreement would be glorifying to God. What if God purposefully left things vague in Scripture and in life for a purpose? Maybe if we can learn to disagree in love, to maintain unity despite differences of opinion, to discuss tough issues with humility and grace, then we will no longer be “missing the point.”


God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Books I'm Reading

Is Christianity True? (Part 4)

By Jeremy Myers
27 Comments

In this last post, I want to reveal the primary reason I believe โ€œChristianityโ€ is true. And remember, Iโ€™m not alking about the religion of Christianity, but the aspect of my life where I believe in Jesus for eternal life, and try to follow His leading and His example.

It seems that most studies in comparative religion look at all the various options, find the scores upon scores of similarities between the religions, and conclude that โ€œthey are basically all the same.โ€ To me, thatโ€™s like taking an orange, an apple, and a mango and saying, โ€œThey all basically round, theyโ€™re all fruits, they can all be eaten, they all grow on trees,โ€ฆ so they are all the same.โ€ Yet as everybody knows,ย these three fruitsย are certainly not all the same. You distinguish them not by focusing on the similaraties, but by focusing on the differences.

When it comes to โ€œChristianityโ€ and all other religions, there seems to be one primary difference: grace. (Diane and William mentioned this in the comment sectionย of the previous post!) Grace is the reason I believe โ€œChristianityโ€ as true. Grace makes Christianity unique, and grace provides the only way for sinful people to be restored to God. Without grace, Christianity is just another religion.

And I donโ€™t mean the weak-kneed concept of grace that is found in most our churches where we talk and teach it, butย donโ€™t really believe it. No, I mean true, no restrictions, no fine print, limitlness, boundless, liberating grace.

Let me be clear. As I observe people of all religions (including many Christians), mostย have a concept ofย grace. But the popular religious idea of grace does not come close to what I believe the Bible teaches about grace. Most religious people (including most โ€œChristiansโ€) believe that we have toย gain and maintain a certain level of morality in order to stay in Godโ€™s good graces, in order to please and appease God. Most religious people I have talked to, speak about being โ€œsaved by the grace of Godโ€ (or some sort of similar terminology). But as I ask more questions, and dig a little deeper, I find thatย most peopleย believe that Godโ€™s grace only extends as far as our obedience. If we rebell against Him, or persistently act contrary to His will and commands, He removes His grace from us. For many, being a recipient of Godโ€™s grace means that God gives us the grace (or gift) of having the power and ability to obey God.

This is not what I believe about grace, nor is it what I believe the Bible teaches about grace.ย I believe the Bible teaches that Godโ€™s grace is without limit, stipulations, or conditions. Once we have received Godโ€™s grace through faith in Jesus, there is nothing we can do or say to separate ourselves from Godโ€™s grace. His grace covers all sin, past, present, and future.

When people of most religions hear this (even โ€œChristiansโ€), they often say, โ€œWell then, why canโ€™t you just go out and sin all you want?โ€

When I hear that, I know I have done a good job explaining grace. This is the sameย reaction Paul got when he explained grace (cf. Romans 6:1). If your understanding of Godโ€™s grace does not lead to this objection, then let me suggest that you donโ€™t understand grace.

So why do I think that grace separates โ€œChristianityโ€ from the rest of religions? Because grace teaches us that God, who loves us, wants so much for things to be restored between us and Him, that He did everything necessary to restore that relationship. He left nothing up to us.ย God knew that if He left anything up to us as far as obedience is concerned, all of us would fail. Without grace, nobody could be sure they were good enough, obedient enough, holy enough to be on โ€œGodโ€™s good side.โ€ But with grace, all of the fear and effort fades away, and we can simply focus on enjoying the presence (and presents) of God.

So there it is. Why is Christianity true? I think there are a lot of factors that contribute toย itโ€™s โ€œtrueness,โ€ most of which, however,ย can be found in other religions as well. But the one characteristic which sets Christianity apart from all other religions is grace. And grace is the only way for sinful people to get back into a relationship with a holy God.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Discipleship, Theology of Salvation

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 213
  • 214
  • 215
  • 216
  • 217
  • …
  • 243
  • Next Page »
Join the discipleship group
Learn about the gospel and how to share it

Take my new course:

The Gospel According to Scripture
Best Books Every Christian Should Read
Study Scripture with me
Subscribe to my Podcast on iTunes
Subscribe to my Podcast on Amazon

Do you like my blog?
Try one of my books:

Click the image below to see what books are available.

Books by Jeremy Myers

Theological Study Archives

  • Theology – General
  • Theology Introduction
  • Theology of the Bible
  • Theology of God
  • Theology of Man
  • Theology of Sin
  • Theology of Jesus
  • Theology of Salvation
  • Theology of the Holy Spirit
  • Theology of the Church
  • Theology of Angels
  • Theology of the End Times
  • Theology Q&A

Bible Study Archives

  • Bible Studies on Genesis
  • Bible Studies on Esther
  • Bible Studies on Psalms
  • Bible Studies on Jonah
  • Bible Studies on Matthew
  • Bible Studies on Luke
  • Bible Studies on Romans
  • Bible Studies on Ephesians
  • Miscellaneous Bible Studies

Advertise or Donate

  • Advertise on RedeemingGod.com
  • Donate to Jeremy Myers

Search (and you Shall Find)

Get Books by Jeremy Myers

Books by Jeremy Myers

Schedule Jeremy for an interview

Click here to Contact Me!

© 2025 Redeeming God · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Knownhost and the Genesis Framework