Christians often divide the world into two groups: Christians and non-Christians. But have you ever heard of a noun-Christian? It is the type of Christian who would rather talk about doctrine, theology, and the meanings of various biblical words and passages without ever actually doing anything. It is the type of Christian I used to be, and the type of Christian I hung out with most.
As an example, we have all sat through a missions conference where the emphasis of a sermon was on the meaning of the word “Go” in Matthew 28:19, but the only call to action at the end of the message was to give more money when the plate was passed. I know I have preached semons like this before. If faith without works is useless (James 2), discussion without action is worse.
I recently came across the idea in Erwin McManus’ book An Unstoppable Force where he talks about this concept. He writes:
Biblical interpretation must be missiological, not theological. A theological construct for interpretation finds success in the attainment of knowledge. The more you know, the more mature a Christian you are thought to be. And yet knowledge of the Bible does not guarantee application of the Bible. To know is not necessarily to do. When the construct applied to the Bible is missiological, you engage the Bible to discover the response required of your life. It is significant that the history of the first-century church is called the book of Acts, not the books of Truths (p. 72).
Obedience to Scripture unlocks their mystery. …If the Bible doesn’t bring change, it is not being engaged (p. 85).
For too long we have focused on making sure people believe the right things and have left their concerns alone. I know it may sound like heresy, but it is more important to change what people care about than to change what they believe! You can believe without caring, but you can’t care without believing. We cannot afford to fill our churches with members who have biblical beliefs and worldly concerns (p. 111).
What does your church mean when it uses the word missions? It has always astonished me that so many churches and individuals who are ‘missions minded’ rarely engage in the mission of Christ that requires them to come face to face with an unbeliever and love that person into God’s kingdom (p. 125).
So what did you learn in church this past Sunday, or in your Bible reading today? Let me challenge you: if you were shown something you were supposed to do, and you haven’t yet done it, don’t read another chapter in your Bible or attend another church service until you have obeyed. God desires obedience, not faithful Bible reading and regular attendance at church (cf. 1 Sam 15:22).
If I ever pastor a church again, I would like to put the “service” back into “church service.” We would only gather at the church building every other week for the typical Sunday events. On the “off” weeks, we would go out as a group and put into practice what we learned the previous week. I am not sure exactly how this would work, but it might be interesting to try. Who knows? Maybe we would find that service helped us develop more as followers of Christ than singing and sermons ever did.
bullet says
I guess that would make me a noun-atheist.
Maybe we would find that service helped us develop more as followers of Christ than singing and sermons ever did.
Can’t I just give you some money and you can do that? I would, but, you know, I’m busy and stuff.
🙂
Randy Siever says
Jeremy,
Wonderful post. You forgot the plea, though. It goes something like this: “You have a choice to make. There are those who GO and those who SEND. Which are you?” And THEN you pass the plate. Nobody really wants to go, so they obviously have to SEND, which means GIVE. Evangelists LOVE this twisted paradigm.
You need to pastor a church just like the one you described. Move to Reno and we’ll start one. Texas has too many already.
Reid says
Jeremy-
Time and time again your writings articulate the thoughts and convictions that I am currently experiencing. I’m a first year seminary student and I have come to realize that there is a extrodinary gap between knowing and actually doing. I’m tempted to stop everything I’m doing and just try to absorb all the knoweldge I can. That seems to stunt my growth because it is actually lopsided. I have found balance in outreach and practice of the principles I learn.
Thank you,
Reid Beggs
Glenn_W says
Jeremy,
You cannot separate knowledge of bible doctrine from application. I will admit that many pulpits provide very little doctrine and leave their congregations in a state of spiritual anorexia. What is McManus’s solution? If you change what people care about it needs to be in agreement with scripture. We are to conform our thinking to the mind of Christ. To do anything else is to waste our effort on works of the flesh (wood, hay, and stubble), it is worth nothing even if it feels good.
All Scripture is God-breathed, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness; that the man of God might be mature, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
(2 Tim. 3:16-17)
The next time you chat with Lance ask him about the difference between gnosis and epignosis doctrine. That is the difference that counts.
Glenn
Rose~ says
Interesting thoughts, Jeremy.
Matthew C says
I probably am.