In Romans 9:3, Paul writes, “For I could wish that I myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my countrymen according to the flesh.”
Is Paul saying that he wished he could go to hell if it would mean that his Jewish brethren would believe in Jesus and become Christians?
No, Paul Does Not Desire to Go to Hell in Romans 9:3
First, hell is not mentioned in Romans 9:3. Paul states his desire to be accursed if this would allow his brethren, the Jewish people, to recognize Jesus as the Messiah.
When people believe that the word anathema, or accursed, means “going to hell when you die,” they think that Paul is wishing he could go to hell if only all his fellow Israelites would receive eternal life instead. This sounds very noble and extremely spiritual, but Paul isn’t saying he wants to go to hell for the sake of the Jewish people.
Paul is saying that he would be willing to lose his life if it meant that his fellow Israelites would recognize Jesus as the Messiah. It is interesting that while the Jewish men in Acts 23:14 announce a curse on themselves if they don’t kill Paul, Paul here announces a desire to be cursed if it would lead to the deliverance of the Jewish people.
Indeed, Paul’s life was quite often on the line as he sought to declare the gospel to the Hebrew people. So these were not mere words on Paul’s part, but were actually indicative of Paul’s regular approach to ministry.
The Translator is the Traitor
The objection to this way of understanding Romans 9:3, of course, is the phrase “from Christ.” In the NKJV, Paul says that he wishes he “were accursed from Christ,” but other translations are not so vague. The NAS has Paul wishing to be “separated from Christ” while the NIV has Paul stating a desire to be “cut off from Christ.” Yet neither “separated” nor “cut off” are in the original Greek, but were added to the text by the translators in an attempt to explain what they thought Paul was saying.
However, rather than clarifying his point, it appears they have muddied it. While Paul’s statement could be understood as a desire to be eternally separated from Jesus Christ, this does not fit with all other uses of the term anathema in the Bible, and so it is the least likely way to understand this text.
Two other possible ways of understanding Romans 9:3 are preferable.
Two Ways of Understanding Romans 9:3
First, when Paul states his desire to be “accursed from Christ,” he could be saying that Jesus Christ is the originator of the anathema. In this way, Paul would be stating that if he were put to death (anathema), it would be something that came from Christ.
A second option, however, is more preferable still. When Paul writes about “Christ,” he usually does not have only Jesus in mind. The word Christ (Gk., Christos) is equivalent to the Hebrew word for Messiah (Heb., Messiach), and means King. But in reference to the way Paul uses the title Christ, it does not only refer to Jesus, but also to all those who are in Jesus Christ and rule and reign through Him.
In Paul’s letters, the word Christ is shorthand for “the body of Christ” or “Jesus Christ and all who are in Him.” Since Christ and Messiah are kingly terms, when Paul speaks of the corporate life of Christ in the church, he is also thinking of the rule and reign of God on earth through the body of Christ, the church.
This final option provides the best way of reading Romans 9:3.
When Paul writes about being anathema from Christ, he is not stating a desire to be eternally cut off or separated from Jesus, but is instead stating his desire, if it were possible, to give up his life and his ministry within the Kingdom of God if such a sacrifice would help Israel come to the knowledge that Jesus is the Messiah.
This, of course, would still allow Paul to spend eternity with God and with all the saints.
In Romans 9:3, Paul does not have a wish for hell, but a willingness to sacrifice himself for the sake of those he loves.
Such sacrificial willingness is supremely Christlike, which only goes to show that if Paul were indeed to die for Christ as he desires, this would not separate Him from Jesus but would instead be the perfect representation of Jesus in His sacrifice for us.
Understanding the Gospel requires us to properly understand the key words and terms of the Gospel. Take my course, "The Gospel Dictionary" to learn about the 52 key words of the Gospel, and hundreds of Bible passages that use these words.
This course costs $297, but when you join the Discipleship group, you can to take the entire course for free.
Paul didn’t believe in Hell. He never, ever once mentions it for any reason, let alone as a motivation to turn to God.
I agree.
Did Paul believe those not redeemed by Christ would be cast out where there was weeping and gnashing of teeth?
The word hell does not even appear in the Bible. It is a mistranslation, perhaps deliberately influenced by pagans such as Dante.
Then what is all the descriptive langauge describing, things like fire and brimestone? Is that merely describing what it’s going to feel like when one is cast out of the Kingdom of Heaven?
If it’s not hell, then is it simply a description to help us to comprehend how it is going to feel when we are eternally separated from God?
Jeremy, should this be changed to “isn’t”?
This sounds very noble and extremely spiritual, but Paul is saying he wants to go to hell for the sake of the Jewish people.
Yes! Good catch. I rushed that post out, and had a few typos in it … and that was a big one! Thanks!
Also, the word “wants” isn’t the appropriate word for what people are thinking Paul is saying. “Would” and “if” would be a more appropriate way of saying it. People are saying that Paul is saying that he “would” go to hell eternally “if” it meant the Jewish people would come to Jesus.
Obviously, nobody thinks anyone would want to go to hell for any reason unless there was something mentally wrong with them.
Thanks Matt… you just saved me “the trouble” (again Jeremy! 😉 )
I think he felt “accursed” because he was in conflict, between his former total identification with his own people, and the fact that many of them did not accept Christ, whereas many non-Jews became Christian, and Paul had to work through in his own mind where his loyalty belonged..
The author is stating things a bit ambiguously here.
Read Romans 9:3, first.
Nobody is suggesting that Paul actually desires to go to hell for the Israeli people. It’s an IF statement, a conditional thing. People are suggesting that Paul is saying that IF it means that the Israelis will be saved, THEN he is willing to go to hell … so that they will be saved.
I read it as an expression of his love for his Jewish kin, not to be taken literally.
Oh, I take it quite literally. As a devout follower of Jesus, he would know that’s impossible because only God can orchestrate that, and any actual action on his part would be devoid of God and foolishness, and so he’s expressing what he literally feels and would literally do if it weren’t impossible and foolish to show the reader how much it pains him that his own people refuse to hear the message of their own Messiah.
If only we Christians here in the USA loved our own people so much. Maybe we could finally speak up instead ignoring the nation being burned down around us. Thank goodness we have Trump right now, but I fret to see what happens in 2029.
I believe we can’t understand why Paul would say what he did simply because we have gotten the goal and the prize mixed up. When you run a race, you will not win the trophy by running to the trophy, but by crossing the finish line first (actual goal). God has told us His goal quite plainly; Expand the expression of His kingdom here on earth (show the world what the whole world would look like if everybody obeyed the King), save as many people as possible from Satan and make God’s people group as large as possible, and then the REWARD will be heaven. (we cannot do this by ourselves; we can only do it as a group) We get disillusioned when we focus on heaven as our goal, rather than the incentive to work towards God’s goal. So Paul was saying he would give up his own salvation if only a whole group of people would then be part of God’s kingdom. He was looking after God’s interest; not his own. Paradoxically, this is exactly the kind of attitude that is worthy of reward.
Interesting take, but it seems to me that Paul was saying it on a more personal level, as though he personally loved specifically the Israelis that much. Some translations use familial terms in translating Paul’s words.
Paul didn’t indicate that willingness about any other people group, and he was sending letters to everybody. Paul also didn’t say that in a general sense about everybody. He said it specifically about his own people, the Jews.
The translator of the Geneva bible of 1599 thinks Paul meant that he was willing to lose his soul forever if it meant that the Jews would recognize their Messiah. (Important to note that the Geneva bible on Bible Gateway is likely the one that Kirk Cameron had rewritten into modern English because the original Geneva bible is difficult to understand like the original King James Bible is.)
(Also important to note for some is that the Schofield bible was written in 1909, 300 years after the latest Geneva bible.)
I quote the Geneva bible translator’s footnote for Romans 9:3, (As shown by Bible Gateway)
***Again, this is only the footnote, the translator’s personal opinion, not the actual verse.***
“The Apostle loved his brethren so entirely, that if it have been possible he would have been ready to have redeemed the casting away of the Israelites, with the loss of his own soul forever: for this word separate, betokeneth as much in this place.”