When it comes to speaking the truth in love, what matters is not how you think you are speaking. What matters is how others perceive it.
I sometimes hear Christians say the meanest things to other people, and when confronted about it, they say “I am just saying what needs to be said to rescue their soul from hell. If you saw someone walking toward a cliff, wouldn’t you shout and yell at them if it would keep them from walking off the cliff?”
I understand the analogy, but people walking off a cliff and people headed toward eternal separation with God are two very different things, and when God sought to rescue humanity from eternal separation, He does not choose to yell at us, but instead chooses to love and serve.
No example of this is greater than Jesus Christ.
A quote from The Myth of a Christian Nation by Greg Boyd is particularly appropriate here:
For the church to lack love is for the church to lack everything. No heresy could conceivably be worse!
…We evangelical Christians often insist that we are loving; it’s just that the world is so sinful they can’t see it—or so we tell ourselves. They don’t understand what “true love” is. That attitude is frankly as arrogant as it is tragic. …If contemporary people don’t see in us what ancient people saw in Christ, it can only be because the love that was present in Christ isn’t present in us. And if they see in us what they saw in ancient Pharisees, it can only be because the self-righteousness found in the Pharisees is found in us.
Our comical insistence that we are loving, despite our reputation, is a bit like a man insisting he’s a perfectly loving husband when his wife, kids, and all who know him insist he’s an unloving, self-righteous jerk. If he persists in his self-serving opinion of himself, insisting that his wife, kids, and all who know him don’t understand what “true love” is, it simply confirms the perspective these others have of him. This, I submit, is precisely the position much of the evangelical church of America is in. Until the culture at large instinctively identifies us as loving, humble servants, and until the tax collectors and prostitutes of our day are beating down our doors to hang out with us as they did with Jesus, we have every reason to accept our culture’s judgment of us as correct. We are indeed more pharisaic than we are Christlike (pp. 134-135).
While our government may give us the freedom of speech, and the right to say just about anything we want to anyone we want, the gospel of Jesus Christ gives us no such freedom. Our speech must always be with grace, as we speak the truth in love, making sure that in everything we say, no unwholesome word proceeds out of our mouth, but only what is beneficial, edifying, encouraging, uplifting, and helpful (Col 4:6; Eph 4:15, 29).
Under the gospel, we do not have the right to say what we want, when we want, and where we want, but are called to speak in such a way that all people will be drawn to Jesus because of His great love for them as revealed in our words and actions.
sonja says
AaaaaMEN!
Sam says
And I second that AaaaMEN! We are indeed more Pharisaic than we are Christlike.
My observation – everyone whom I have personally say that we must speak the truth in love does neither. Those I know who do it don’t talk about it. Those who talk about it don’t do it.
Jeremy Myers says
Thanks Sam and Sonja,
That is a great book by Greg Boyd. I think every Christian should read it…
mark brown says
Maybe, but it’s called “Myth of a Christian Nation”… thinking primarily of the U.S.A.?
Our nation (Canada) has long prided itself on it’s open-minded (“liberal”)tolerance (to everything but “sin, righteousness and judgement”), and self-sacrificing (som) morality. So, I doubt much in Boyd’s book would really apply to us and our churches. (Kidding!… of course)
I wish sometimes I would communicate without using cynical sarcasm.
There is only “one nation under God”; His church… and we do not need to fight for Him, or defend His (our) reputation (etc.). The battle belongs to the Lord, and He has already won!
We are free to live, love, and die in following our Lord. He came back (not leaving us orphans) to dwell in our hearts… that where He is (blessed, exalted and seated at the right hand of the Father), there we may also be! Now! Both in eternal standing and in spiritual experience/reality.
May we reckon it (count on it) as so. Amen?
– M.
Jeremy Myers says
Good points. I think Boyd’s book are primarily thinking about the USA, but nationalistic idolatry can be part of any nation, I would think, and so we must, as you have pointed out, remember that we are part of the only true “one nation under God” –the church.
Nita says
Thank you very much for this series of posts, Jeremy! I’m grateful that you are writing about these issues and am grateful for Boyd’s book, Myth of a Christian Nation, as well.
Jeremy Myers says
It is a good book!
Marshall says
there will always be a split-vote in assessment of who or what is “loving”. A majority having surmised the words of Jesus to be other than Love, they put him to death. Stephen would be next [Acts 7]. Despite an intensely loving appeal, more and more disciples are taken to be absent Love. Some to judge would carry with them tendency to focus upon the hate love bears (i.e., hatred of sin, injustice, evil…). Thankfully, Love does not require its own recognition nor a love returned.
Jeremy, you have written, “people walking off a cliff and people headed toward eternal separation with God are two very different things…”
Indeed. The former being far less dangerous.
Jeremy Myers says
Along with numerous other differences as well which call for a different approach than yelling at people.