In 1 Corinthians 5:5 and 1 Timothy 1:20, Paul says he hands people over to Satan for the destruction of their flesh.
What does this mean and how is it accomplished?
There are a few main views:
Let Satan Kill Him
Some believe that the man who is handed over to Satan for the destruction of his flesh will suffer premature death. They noted this word “destruction” (Gk. olethros) is used three other times in Scripture (1 Thess 5:3; 2 Thess 1:9; 1 Tim 6:9) and refers to physical death as a result of sin. Some believe this is what happened to Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5:1-11), or what Scripture means when it refers to “the sin unto death” (Rom 6:16; 1 John 5:16).
In this case, handing someone over to Satan is like giving them a death sentence. Related to this, some believe that handing someone over to Satan means that we are consigning them to everlasting torment in hell. This is the sort of thinking that has led to so much judgment, condemnation, and killing of other people throughout church history, and is a complete misunderstanding of the text.
Destruction of the Sin Nature
A second, softer view is that Paul is not referring to physical death, but what some refer to as “the mortification of sin,” that is, the destruction of our sinful tendencies and fleshly desires. Proponents of this view point out that in 1 Corinthians 5:5, Paul contrasts “flesh” with “spirit.” While “flesh” can refer to the physical body, it most often refers to the “sinful nature” in mankind (cf. Gal 5:17), especially when placed in contrast to “spirit” as in 1 Corinthians 5:5. So the destruction of the flesh would not be physical death, but the process of learning to defeat temptation and sin.
Some authors have referred to this as the “mortification of sin.” In support of this view, when Paul speaks of handing two believers over to Satan in 1 Timothy 1:20, they did not die but were still alive and well, and still causing problems for Paul and the church in Ephesus (cf. 2 Tim 2:17; 4:14).
However, I am not sure why Satan would be all that cooperative in helping other people destroy their sinful inclinations. It seems that if someone was handed over to Satan, he would want to help their sinful tendencies increase, not decrease. So for this reason, it seems that handing a person over to Satan for the destruction of his flesh refers to something else.
Experiencing the Consequences of Sin
To what does it refer? First, we must remember that spiritually, there are two realms we can participate in: the kingdom of light and the kingdom of darkness (Col 1:13). One is ruled by the reign of God the other by the ways of hell. Life is a constant struggle between which realm we will reside in. If we follow the ways of God as revealed in Jesus, we reside in the Kingdom of Heaven. If we follow our sinful flesh and live according to its rules, we are trapped by the gates of hell. Neither one nor the other determines eternal destiny, but rather how we interact with each other while on earth.
So when Paul hands a person over to Satan, Paul is not physically giving a person to Satan (how would someone actually do that anyway?), but is declaring to all members of a church that a person who was living according to the ways of the Kingdom of God has now decided to live according to the ways of the Kingdom of Satan. They are not loving according to the Spirit, but according to the flesh.
This man is, in effect, excommunicated from the church so that he can experience the full spiritual, physical, emotional, mental and social consequences of his sinful actions. Essentially what this means for the church is that they should not fellowship with him (see 5:10-11, 13), for it is primarily in fellowship with other Spirit-led believers where there is grace, peace, mercy, and love.
Restoration is the Goal
The hope is that when he sees how destructive his actions were to himself and to his life, and when he begins to miss the loving fellowship of other believers, he will repent of his ways, and be restored to fellowship (cf. 2 Thess 3:14-15).
Never For Unbelievers
And again, Paul emphatically states that handing someone over to Satan in such a way is not for those outside the church, but only for those inside (1 Cor 5:9-13). Far too often, the church reverses this, and spends its time condemning our neighbors, and the people across town, or the religion on the other side of the world. Paul is adamantly opposed to such judgment of others.
Not to Harm or Kill Others
But even when we do feel justified in criticizing those within the church, Paul is not providing a license for us to do them bodily harm, or even to slander them to others. Yet throughout church history, this is what most churches have seemed to believe Paul was condoning when he wrote about handing someone over to Satan.
Some have used this idea as a way to justify destroying the lives of people or even killing those whom we consider heretics and reprobates. If someone teaches against our doctrinal statement, some have believed this gives us the right to burn them at the stake.
I will begin to look at this issue tomorrow as we continue this series about how some churches throughout history have used doctrinal statements to damage and even kill others.
Mike says
This is exactly what was done to me, though the pastor did not reference in our conversations, in the letter I received, nor was it announced in church that my “brothers and sisters” or the pastor hoped I would be restored and come back to the assembly.
They meant for me never to return.
Peace,
Jeremy Myers says
Yeah, most churches, when they “excommunicate” you, intend for you to never return.
Katherine Gunn says
Hmm…interesting. I’ve never heard it put like that. I like. 😀
Jeremy Myers says
Food for thought!
Greg says
Great perspective. Being cast into the kingdom of darkness would make me want to repent and come right back into the kingdom of God. But, what does this perspective say to the doctrine of assurance of salvation? I thought once we’re in the kingdom of God we are ALWAYS in the kingdom of God and never taken from it (John 10:29, Romans 8:38-39).
Jeremy Myers says
Greg,
Great question. I wondered if this would come up.
I do believe in eternal security, so I would say that although we are citizens of the Kingdom of God through faith in Jesus, we can still live according to some of the rules (and consequences) of the Kingdom of Darkness.
So through sanctification, we learn how to live according to the new rules of the new realm.
ella terrowe says
as in the beginning God has always left us with free will to choose. john 10:29 expresses God’s commitment to us. however as in the beginning our commitment to stay faithful to the word will determine our fate. romans 8: 38-39 indicates that no external force or power can separate a person from God’s love. it does not address the fact of our free will to choose. in the beginning it was choice that separated man from God. that is still the case.
Chris says
Well written piece on this verse/subject. I tend to agree with your take on it.
Paula says
Note that in 1 Timothy Paul says some things that are contrary to Jesus’ teaching
He calls Timothy his son. So that he is Timothy’s father. He tells Timothy to
follow and teach his doctrine; note he claims that was specially received by him,
different from what other apostles who were with Jesus had received. He says
that the law is only for morally evil people, practicing sin. He says he has deemed
someone a sinner and “handed him over to Satan.” But Jesus said call no man father.
call God who is spirit father. Jesus said the law was permanent, every jot and tittle,
not just to apply to some. Jesus said, Call no man teacher, but the Messiah. He warned
of people claiming to be him. (Paul claimed elsewhere Christ was in him.)
Paul says he is an apostle and he tells the truth. He says I am not a liar. Why?
His teaching directly contradicts Jesus on many points. Paul makes up new rules,
for example telling women what they are allowed to do and wear; that they cannot
teach. He warned them not to adorn themselves with beautiful things. But Jesus said call no man teacher but the Messiah and beware of those who claim to be him. Jesus said do not be
concerned about what to wear; consider the lilies of the field – even Solomon in all his glory was
not so beautifully arrayed (hardly a put down of beauty!)
Jesus said judge not. Paul judges a lot.
Paul said and did a lot more things that contradict Jesus. Many teachers (again men
teach!!!) go through verbal hoops trying to explain away what Paul says by what through
torturous attempts they decide he “must” mean because otherwise his statements sound
contrary to Jesus. They are contrary to Jesus. Jesus said I will be with you always. Not inside
you. With you. He said he would send the comforter, the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Truth,
to guide his people. That is how he teaches. That is who gives us the ability to discern.