Did it ever occur to you that Jesus was unregenerate? He never had to be regenerated by God because He never lacked eternal life. He always had eternal life. In fact, Jesus is eternal life (John 1:4-5; 14:6; 1 John 5:11-12). Yet even though Jesus is eternal life, Jesus Himself was elected by God. Jesus was chosen. “A wide range of texts throughout the New Testament identifies Jesus as God’s Chosen or Appointed One” (Klein, The New Chosen People, 269).
Robert Shank overstates the case when he writes that “outside of Christ this is no election of any man” (Shank, Elect in the Son, 27). Nevertheless, it is safe to say that Jesus is the premier Elect One (Isa 42:1). Even when He hung dying on the cross, He was recognized by His enemies as being the chosen one of God (Luke 23:35).
Again, does this mean that Jesus was chosen by God to sovereignly receive the free gift of eternal life from God? Of course not! Yet Jesus was elected by God from all eternity. What for? As we saw in the case of Israel, God chose Jesus, not to be the recipient of regeneration, but to serve a purpose and fulfill a role in God’s plan of redemption.
Just as God’s election of Israel was an election to service, purpose, and vocation, so also, God’s election of Jesus was to service, purpose, and vocation.
Jesus was to be Israel’s righteous remnant, a light to the Gentiles, and God’s Suffering Servant (Isa 49:6-7; cf. Matt 12:18). “The Messiah, like the nation [of Israel], was chosen to do a task” (Marston and Forster, God’s Strategy in Human History, 147).
What task did Jesus accomplish as God’s Elect One?
According to Jesus Himself, He came:
- to fulfill the law and prophets (Matt 5:17),
- to reveal the Father (Matt 11:27),
- to serve as a ransom for many (Matt 20:28),
- to preach (Mark 1:38),
- to call sinners to repentance (Mark 2:17),
- to proclaim freedom for captives, give sight to the blind, and proclaim the year of God’s favor (Luke 4:18-19),
- to preach the good news of the kingdom of God (Luke 4:43),
- to save the world (John 3:17; Luke 19:10),
- to give life (John 10:10, 28),
- to do the will of the Father (John 6:38),
- to bring judgment (John 9:39),
- to share the words of the Father (John 17:8),
- to testify to the truth (John 18:37).
Various New Testament authors confirm all of these, and additionally say that Jesus came
- to destroy Satan’s power and works (Heb 2:14; 1 John 3:8),
- to take away sin (1 John 3:5),
- to taste death for everyone (Heb 2:9),
- and to become a high priest (Heb 2:17).
This is a significant list, and they reveal that the election of Jesus as God’s Messiah was not an election to eternal life, but an election to service.
This fits which what we have already seen about God’s election of Israel. Just as it is best to understand the election of Israel as election to service, so also, the election of Jesus most naturally is understood as an election to service.
If you want to read more about Calvinism, check out other posts in this blog series: Words of Calvinism and the Word of God.The first step in moving away from a rationalistic concept of predestination is taken when we begin to interpret this doctrine in terms of the election of Christ. No longer will predestination be … the arbitrary decision of an absolute sovereign power. The election of which we speak is that which has been revealed in Jesus Christ. The God who has chosen us we know and love as the God and Father of our Lord Jesus, his Chosen One (Hillman, “Scriptural Election: The Third Way,” Present Truth Magazine (Vol. 45), 17.)
Wesley Rostoll (@Beardedllama) says
Great post Jeremy. I was chatting with some friends just last night about the same thing 🙂
Jeremy Myers says
Fantastic! It is quite a topic and leads to many discussions! Any conclusions you came up with your friends?
Wesley Rostoll (@Beardedllama) says
Mostly I have seeing that election is always linked with glorification and the eternal purpose themes in scripture eg Romans 8:16-30, Hebrews 2:10 and 2 Thessalonians 2:10-14. I look forward to hearing more from you on the topic.
Jeremy Myers says
Glad you are enjoying it. I will be writing on at least two of those texts.
Emilio Gomez says
If Jesus is God how was he chosen by God?
Jeremy Myers says
I am not sure I understand the question. If being “chosen” means being chosen to service, then Jesus was chosen by God to serve a particular role and function, which He did perfectly.
Oh… wait, I see. You are challenging the Trinity. This post is not about the Trinity. I have written on that elsewhere.
Gerrie Malan says
“…the election of Jesus as God’s Messiah was not an election to eternal life, but an election to service.”
The more I read this statement, the more powerful its meaning becomes!
Jeremy Myers says
Yes. I think I learned it from Forster and Marston, whose book I will frequently quote in this series.
Jeff says
Proverbs 8:22-31 are wonderful verses to show that Jesus was the first of the election. Great discussion!!
Mike Blondino says
Jeremy, this is presented so well.
You hooked me when you said, “Jesus was unregenerate.” As I read you took me around the corner. Awesome.
I would like to add one little thing. Peter 1:20 says that Jesus was Chosen before the creation of the world. There are a number of great rabbit trails whether you want to look the blood of the “eternal covenant” noted in Hebrews, a covenant which is not written about in scripture anywhere, but implies that the plan of salvation is before all time – and it is the blood of the cross which impelled Christ from the grave. Moreover, vast amounts of New Testament doctrine originated from the teachings in Enoch.
I say this because the term Son of Man harkens back to the Enoch passages as the supreme identity of Messiah. I’m not arguing that Enoch should be in the cannon (as even Enoch understood his work would not be included in Scripture) but I am suggesting that Jesus himself repeatedly echoed things found only in Enoch. Jude his brother quotes the book, and Peter alludes to it. Jesus’ reliance on the term “Son of Man” is incredible because everything we find in Jesus is dramatically unveiled in Enoch. His “choosing” is specifically referenced:
CHAP. XLVI
There I beheld the Ancient of days, whose head was like white wool, and with him another, whose countenance resembled that of man. His countenance was full of grace, like that of one of the holy angels. Then I inquired of one of the angels, who went with me, and who showed me every secret thing, concerning this Son of man; who he was; whence he was; and why he accompanied the Ancient of days. He answered and said to me, This is the Son of man, to whom righteousness belongs; with whom righteousness has dwelt; and who will reveal all the treasures of that which is concealed: for the Lord of spirits has chosen him; and his portion has surpassed all before the Lord of spirits in everlasting uprightness.
At his trial we read…
But Jesus remained silent and gave no answer. Again the high priest asked him, “Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?” “I am,” said Jesus. “And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven.” (Mark 14.61-62)
You’re spot on. Christ was chosen to be our salvation, to fulfill the eternal covenant, to lead us, to grant us righteousness, to model salvation to us, to guide and comfort us, and then when all has gone to pot, to return and consummate the grace he has chosen us to receive.
Thank you for taking the time to write this great piece.
Jeremy Myers says
Thanks for the encouraging words and the additional insights, Mike. yes, the Son of Man concept is Scripture is quite significant. Thanks!
Paul Germana says
Baloney, you insist on removing the Book Of Enoch and you’ll be punished in hell for it!
Raymond says
I’m not sure about some calvinisti. teaching but neither am I arminist ..I have been on both sides I think there is a middle ground but to find it seems to b a big struggle for me think aw tozer had a good balance to a point but then what about the bondage of the will ?
Brock says
Our wills are definitely in bondage to sin but this slavery analogy is equally authoritative to the phrase ‘dead in sin'(Eph. 2:5) and bondage to send is indicative that you can be loosed and that you desire to be loosed. dead in sin is often taken to an extreme of saying you can’t even desire salvation which I think is a mistake. notice how Ephesians 2:3 describes Believers as objects of Wrath prior to Salvation. If they were ‘objects if wrath’, they were not predestined to destruction as it seems to imply in Romans 9. therefore we are in bondage and deathly ill, but God can save all men through faith in the elect one. This is a damaging blow to the doctrines of election and reprobation in both the suprilapsarian and infralapsarian views. I favor infra-lapsarian but I am even more on the side of God’s atonement being for the whole world is accepted in faith. I do hold on to some of the premises that it takes the Glory of creation the powerful work of the Holy Spirit and the word of God as well as the conscience and image bearing in man in order to save. but in saying this I allow for man to repent and admit his bondage and inability and therefore salvation can be for all.