Redeeming God

Liberating you from bad ideas about God

Learn the MOST ESSENTIAL truths for following Jesus.

Get FREE articles and audio teachings in my discipleship emails!


  • Join Us!
  • Scripture
  • Theology
  • My Books
  • About
  • Discipleship
  • Courses
    • What is Hell?
    • Skeleton Church
    • The Gospel According to Scripture
    • The Gospel Dictionary
    • The Re-Justification of God
    • What is Prayer?
    • Adventures in Fishing for Men
    • What are the Spiritual Gifts?
    • How to Study the Bible
    • Courses FAQ
  • Forum
    • Introduce Yourself
    • Old Testament
    • New Testament
    • Theology Questions
    • Life & Ministry

The Grand Canyon and the Flood in Scripture and Science

By Jeremy Myers
Leave a Comment

The Grand Canyon and the Flood in Scripture and Science

Have you ever visited the Grand Canyon? Have you ever wondered how it was formed?

Grand Canyon

As you may know, there are two competing and contradictory explanations for how the Grand Canyon was formed.

Most Young Earth Creationists (Creationists who believe the earth is less than 10,000 years old) believe that the Grand Canyon was formed by the waters of the flood as recorded in Genesis 6-8.

Most other scientists (whether Old Earth Creationists or Evolutionists) believe that the Grand Canyon was slowly formed over millions of years through water erosion.

A recent book tries to reconcile these two views by allowing BOTH science and Scripture to weigh in on how the Grand Canyon was formed. The book is called The Grand Canyon: Monument to an Ancient Earth.

As you may know from my One Verse Podcast in which I am currently working through Genesis 3, and my literal understanding of Genesis 1-3 ends up being quite different than the way Young Earth Creationists understanding these opening chapters of the Bible. Though they may accuse me of not reading the Bible literally, I firmly believe that my explanation is quite close to the way the original author and audience would have understood the text and is therefore, the best and most literal reading of the text. A literal reading of the Biblical text, after all, must take literary factors into consideration.

Grand Canyon Monument to ancient earthAnyway, I was pleased to see that this book on the Grand Canyon puts together some of the best scientific research about the Grand Canyon and matches it with some of the best research and understandings of the biblical text. The end result is that we can agree with much of what science says about the formation of the Grand Canyon while at the same time, seeing that such views are supported and defended by Scripture. This heightens our respect and love for the Bible, rather than diminishes and weakens it.

In the end, the authors and editors of this book argue that the Grand Canyon was formed by lots of water over a very long time, and that this is not only what science argues, but also what Scripture reveals.

This book is somewhat scientifically technical, but the numerous color images, graphs, and charts help make it more accessible to the average reader. No matter what your views are on the Flood and the formation of the Grand Canyon, I highly recommend this book.

God is Redeeming Books Bible & Theology Topics: Books I'm Reading, flood, Genesis 6-8

Advertisement

Unchurching from Churchianity

By Jeremy Myers
52 Comments

Unchurching from Churchianity

I first got to know Richard Jacobson through his interaction with me on Twitter, Facebook, and his comments on this blog. I liked what I saw and started reading his blog, where he creates insightful and humorous cartoons and videos about the church and following Jesus.

So when he asked me to read and review his book, I said “Yes!” as quickly as possible.

(By the way, if you are an aspiring author, THAT is how you do it. I get a couple emails a day from people who want me to read and review their book, but who have never read my blog or one of my own books, have never left a comment on my blog, and who have never interacted me on Twitter or Facebook. Publishing, like everything else in life, begins with relationships. Richard’s book is proof. It debuted at #1 on Amazon in his category.)

The book that Richard wrote is called Unchurching. I have written several books about church myself, but this one is better than any of the ones I have written. At least … I like the way he organized his material and presented his ideas.

UnchurchingThe book chapters are all quite short. This means that even if you only have five minutes here or there to read the book, you can likely finish a chapter in that amount of time. This is a smart way to write a book for today’s busy readers.

Best of all, even though Unchurching is a critical look at the church and contains a call for people to follow Jesus away from the four walls of Christendom, the book is incredibly gracious and kind. I could find no judgmental language, no finger pointing, and no condemnation.

I loved how he said that asking someone “What church do you go to?” is like asking someone “What family do you go to?” The second question makes no sense. We do not go to a family; we are in a family and we operate as a family. This is helpful as well, because the church is like a family, and when we think about it as a family, a lot of the questions that trip us up about how to “do church” fade away. Very rarely, for example, will a family ever have questions about “What day of the week should we meet?” or “Who gets to talk when we are together?”

Based on this idea of the church as a family, Richard Jacobson goes on to talk about church elders as facilitators, on how to carry out conflict resolution within the family of God, and a whole host of other related topics.

All in all, this is a great book about the church. If you have questions about what the church is, how it is to function, and why so many Christians today can confidently claim that they are better able to follow Jesus and be the church in the community now that they have stopped attending a Sunday morning meeting, this book is for you.

In a month or so, I plan on interviewing Richard Jacobson on my Theology.fm podcast, so make sure you tune in for that. Until then, buy a few copies of his book … one for yourself and a couple more to give away. Go here to get your copies of Unchurching today.

Unchurching on Amazon

God is Redeeming Books Bible & Theology Topics: be the church, Books I'm Reading, family of God, go to church, unchurching

Advertisement

One of the Best Commentaries on the Psalms

By Jeremy Myers
1 Comment

One of the Best Commentaries on the Psalms

Commentary on the Psalms

It is extremely difficult to write a good commentary on the Psalms, partly because there are 150 of them, and if all you do is say the barest minimum about each Psalm you will easily end up with a commentary over 300 pages long.

The main reason that is difficult to write a commentary on the Psalms, however, is that they deal with the full range of human emotions. How does one go about analyzing and dissecting emotional poetry without killing it? In some ways, emotions are like jokes: you kill them if you have to explain them.

Both of these difficulties were masterfully solved by the leading Hebrew scholar, Allen Ross. He solved the first problem (that of length) by not even trying to fit a commentary on the Psalms into one volume, but published it as three volumes instead.

commentary on the Psalms - Allen RossVolume 1 covers chapters 1-41,Volume 2 covers 42-89, and Volume 3 covers 90-150. All 3 can be purchased from Amazon.

Regarding the problem of how to analyze emotional poetry, Allen Ross accomplishes this in three ways. First, he makes sure his commentary on the Psalms is not overly technical. Though he does frequently refer to Hebrew words, his language is not academic or full of theological jargon. He write plainly and simply, which is a sign of true genius. Also, there are relatively few footnotes for an academic commentary of this size.

Second, Allen Ross keeps from destroying the emotions in the text by providing the context in which the Psalm was written. By helping the student see what the author was going through, we can better identify with the emotions that were being felt. Though there is not much which is known about most of the Psalms, Allen Ross provides what is known.

For example, on Psalm 52, which is an imprecatory Psalm where David calls down curses upon his foes, Allen Ross indicates that this Psalm was probably written in connection to the incident with Doeg (1 Sam 22:17-23). This is helpful in understanding this Psalm, because all of us have felt this way at one time or another about our foes.

Finally, Allen Ross avoids killing the emotions in the text by providing commentary “In Expository Form.” In other words, the text of the commentary often reads more like the text of a sermon. It is still commentary, but it doesn’t read like a technical commentary, but more like an exhortation.

In the end, these are great commentaries on the Psalms. If you are looking to preach, teach, or study the Psalms, or simply want an aid for your summer devotional reading of the Psalms, I highly recommend Allen P. Ross’ Commentaries on the Psalms.

God is Redeeming Books Bible & Theology Topics: Bible commentary, Books I'm Reading, Psalms

Advertisement

Theology is Boring?

By Jeremy Myers
20 Comments

Theology is Boring?

One of the greatest tragedies in the church today is that so many people think theology is boring.

I have even encountered people who think that “theology” is a Christian curse word. They seem to think that one can either have Christian love or Christian theology, but not both.

What they fail to realize is that this idea itself is a theological belief, and a sadly mistaken one at that. It’s just poor theology to think that Christian love and Christian theology cannot co-exist. I am convinced that true Christian theology, when rightly taught and understood, will lead to Christian love.

The foundation of Christian love IS Christian theology.

If someone wants to reject Christian theology as dry, dusty, boring, and irrelevant for modern life, they should at least make some effort to learn what it is they are rejecting before they reject it. I find that most people who reject theology as irrelevant have never really taken the time to learn any real theology.

The emphasis there is on “real.”

boring theologyLots of people think they know what Christian theology is, when in reality, they only know some popularized, week-kneed, insipid form of theology that does not reflect real Christianity at all. Of course they’re bored, if this is what they think real theology is!

One of my favorite theologians is Dorothy Sayers, and in her book Letters to a Diminished Church, she perfectly summarizes this popularized (but completely false) version of Christian theology as follows:

Q: What does the church think of God the Father?
A: He is omnipotent and holy. He created the world and imposed on man conditions impossible of fulfillment; he is very angry if these are not carried out. He sometimes interferes by means of arbitrary judgments and miracles, distributed with a good deal of favoritism. He likes to be truckled to and is always ready to pounce on anyone who trips up over a difficulty in the law or is having a bit of fun. He is rather like a dictator, only larger and more arbitrary.

Q: What does the Church think of God the Son?
A: He is in some way to be identified with Jesus of Nazareth. It was not His fault that the world was made like this, and, unlike God the Father, He is friendly to man and did His best to reconcile man to God (see Atonement). He has a good deal of influence with God, and if you want anything done, it is best to apply to Him.

Q: What does the Church think of God the Holy Ghost?
A: I don’t know exactly. He was never seen or heard of till [Pentecost]. There is a sin against Him which damns you forever, but nobody knows what it is.

Q: What is the doctrine of the Trinity?
A: The Father incomprehensible, the Son incomprehensible, and the whole thing incomprehensible. Something put in by theologians to make it more difficult—nothing to do with daily life or ethics.

Q: What was Jesus Christ like in real life?
A: He was a good man—so good as to be called the Son of God. He is to be identified in some way with God the Son (q.v.). He was meek and mild and preached a simple religion of love and pacifism. He had no sense of humor. Anything in the Bible that suggests another side to His character must be an interpolation, or a paradox invented by G. K. Chesterton. If we try to live like Him, God the Father will let us off being damned hereafter and only have us tortured in this life instead.

Q: What is meant by the Atonement?
A: God wanted to damn everybody, but His vindictive sadism was sated by the crucifixion of His own Son, who was quite innocent, and therefore a particularly attractive victim. He now only damns people who don’t follow Christ or who never heard of Him.

Q: What does the Church think of sex?
A: God made it necessary to the machinery of the world, and tolerates it, provided the parties (a) are married, and (b) get no pleasure out of it.

Q: What does the Church call Sin?
A: Sex (otherwise than as excepted above); getting drunk; saying “damn”; murder, and cruelty to dumb animals; not going to church; most kinds of amusement. “Original sin” means that anything we enjoy doing is wrong.

Q: What is faith?
A: Resolutely shutting your eyes to scientific fact.

Q: What is the human intellect?
A: A barrier to faith.

Q: What are the seven Christian virtues?
A: Respectability; childishness; mental timidity; dullness; sentimentality; censoriousness; and depression of spirits.

Q: Wilt thou be baptized in this faith?
A: No fear!

As I teach and write about Scripture and theology, I have discovered that the above descriptions perfectly represent the theology of many Christians.

When I teach about Genesis 1–2 and science, people get upset that I am seeking to understand these passages in a way other than the one endorsed by the Creation Science Institute (which really isn’t science at all…)

When I write in my book The Atonement of God that God was not angry about sin, and did not need Jesus to die so that we could be forgiven, people get upset that I am presenting a God who looks and acts just like Jesus Christ instead of like a Hitlerian Zeus.

When I write about sexual innuendos in the Bible, I get nasty emails from people about how I have succumbed to the sexualized culture of modern America. Don’t I know that sex if of the devil except in the case of procreation?

Anyway … one of the early goals of my writing and blogging was to “Bring Scripture and Theology to Life.” This had a double meaning: I not only seek to teach Scripture and Theology in a lively way, but also so that people learned how Scripture and Theology affected their lives today.

I hope I am accomplishing this through my blogging, my books, and my podcast. Very soon I will be adding some theology courses on my blog as well … Stay tuned for more details!

God is Redeeming Theology Bible & Theology Topics: Books I'm Reading, love, theology

Advertisement

Are you looking for a good commentary on 1-2 Chronicles? Seriously?

By Jeremy Myers
Leave a Comment

Are you looking for a good commentary on 1-2 Chronicles? Seriously?

When was the last time you seriously studied through 1-2 Chronicles?

Yeah. I thought so. Me too. (Answer: Never)

1-2 ChroniclesBut if all Scripture is “God Breathed,” then these books also deserve our attention and study.

So I was thrilled to recently receive a review copy of Eugene Merrill’s commentary on these books. And it is a great commentary! I can safely say that it is the best commentary on 1-2 Chronicles I have ever read. Okay, okay … this is because I have never read a commentary on 1-2 Chronicles before, but this does not detract from the value of this present volume.

One of the things I look for most in commentaries is the ability to explain the text in an understandable way while at the same time making the message of the text applicable and pertinent to our time today. Eugene Merrill’s commentary does this well.

He not only provides detailed explanations of the text all the way through (which providing lots of footnotes for those who want to research in more depth), but he also provides theological asides that help the student of Scripture see how the book influences our life and thinking today.

If you are thinking of preaching or teaching through 1-2 Chronicles let me say two things: First, good for you! That’s very courageous. Second, make sure this commentary by Merrill is one of the sources you use in your study.

God is Redeeming Books Bible & Theology Topics: 1-2 Chronicles, Books I'm Reading

Advertisement

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • …
  • 37
  • Next Page »
Join the discipleship group
Learn about the gospel and how to share it

Take my new course:

The Gospel According to Scripture
Best Books Every Christian Should Read
Study Scripture with me
Subscribe to my Podcast on iTunes
Subscribe to my Podcast on Amazon

Do you like my blog?
Try one of my books:

Click the image below to see what books are available.

Books by Jeremy Myers

Theological Study Archives

  • Theology – General
  • Theology Introduction
  • Theology of the Bible
  • Theology of God
  • Theology of Man
  • Theology of Sin
  • Theology of Jesus
  • Theology of Salvation
  • Theology of the Holy Spirit
  • Theology of the Church
  • Theology of Angels
  • Theology of the End Times
  • Theology Q&A

Bible Study Archives

  • Bible Studies on Genesis
  • Bible Studies on Esther
  • Bible Studies on Psalms
  • Bible Studies on Jonah
  • Bible Studies on Matthew
  • Bible Studies on Luke
  • Bible Studies on Romans
  • Bible Studies on Ephesians
  • Miscellaneous Bible Studies

Advertise or Donate

  • Advertise on RedeemingGod.com
  • Donate to Jeremy Myers

Search (and you Shall Find)

Get Books by Jeremy Myers

Books by Jeremy Myers

Schedule Jeremy for an interview

Click here to Contact Me!

© 2025 Redeeming God · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Knownhost and the Genesis Framework