I seem to have an affinity for authors whose names begin with two initials. C. S. Lewis
and G. K. Chesterton
are two of my favorite authors.
The third has both confirmed and challenging my thinking for the past three years. He is N. T. Wright. Today I read his Inaugural Lecture for becoming the Chair of New Testament and Early Christianity at the University of St. Andrews. The lecture is called “Imagining the Kingdom: Missions and Theology in Early Christianity.”
In this paper, he made the following statement, which is quite close to what I have been trying to say in my series on doctrinal statements:
I have come to worry about a…theology…that thinks the point is simply to ‘prove’ the divinity of Jesus, or his resurrection, or the saving nature of his death in themselves, thereby demonstrating fidelity to the Creeds or some other regula fidei. In the gospels themselves it isn’t like this. All these things matter, but they matter because this is how God is becoming king. To prove the great Creeds true, and to affirm them as such, can sadly be a diversionaryย exercise, designed to avoid the real challenge of the first-century gospel, the challenge of God’s becoming king in and through Jesus.