I was recently chided for teaching “dangerous theology.” In the conversation I had with this person, I ended up trying to defend myself and my ideas, showing that they were not, in fact, dangerous.
Afterwards, I realized what I should have said.
I should have said something along the lines of what Mr. Beaver said to Susan inย The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe
โAslan is a lion- the Lion, the great Lion.”
“Ooh,” said Susan. “I’d thought he was a man. Is he quite safe? I shall feel rather nervous about meeting a lion.”
“Safe?” said Mr Beaver. “Who said anything about safe? ‘Course he isn’t safe. But he’s good. He’s the King, I tell you.”
So when accused of teaching dangerous theology, I should have said:
Dangerous? Of course it’s dangerous. We serve a dangerous God. But it’s good and true, I tell you.
In Seminary, it was not uncommon to hear Professors give this warning in class: “What we are going to learn today should probably not ever be taught from the pulpit… at least not if you want to keep your job as a pastor.” Then they would go on to teach some sort of dangerous idea about how a favorite “prophecy” doesn’t actually point to Jesus, or how a favorite text doesn’t mean what most Christians think, or how the misuse and misunderstanding of a particular point of theology could lead to sin.
At that time, I found out the truth of what my professors were saying. I blogged about seven of the dangerous things I was studying in Seminary. And guess what happened? I lost my job as a result.