If you want to understand what the Bible says, you must learn to read the Bible in context. Every passage of Scripture sits inside at least five contexts: the historical-cultural context, the literary context, the grammatical context, the theological context, and the Christological context. When we ignore these, we can make the Bible say almost anything. When we pay attention to them, the Bible comes alive.
When I was a student at Dallas Theological Seminary, Dr. Howard Hendricks told our class an old story called “Agassiz and the Fish.” A young student came to the great naturalist Louis Agassiz, who handed him a dead fish and told him to look at it. Every time the student thought he had seen everything, Agassiz sent him back to look again, and for days he kept finding things he had never noticed. Dr. Hendricks then said, “I am going to give you your fish,” and wrote “Acts 1:8” on the whiteboard. Our assignment was to write down 25 observations on that one verse. When we brought them to class, he told us to go back and find 25 more. Even with 50, he said, we had barely scratched the surface.
The point was that the first and most important step in Bible study is observation. And nearly every observation we make about a text can be summed up in one word: context.
Why You Must Read the Bible in Context
There is an old joke that the five rules of Bible study are context, context, context, context, and context. It is a joke, but it is also true.
Nobody likes being quoted out of context. Even a newspaper headline can be misunderstood without context. If you read “Farmer Bill Dies in House,” is that a story about a farmer named Bill who passed away at home, or about a farm bill that failed to pass in Congress? You cannot know until you read the story.
The Bible is no different. Throughout history, the Bible has been used to defend some of the most outlandish ideas, doctrines, and behaviors, usually by pulling verses out of their context. As the saying goes, “A text without a context is a proof text for a pretext.” If we only quote verses, we are likely cherry-picking Scripture to prove our pet doctrines, rather than learning what God wants to say. I have written before about this sort of shotgun hermeneutics. So let us look at each of the five contexts.
1. The Historical-Cultural Context
The historical-cultural context asks who wrote the text, to whom, when, where, and why. It seeks to understand the worldview, values, beliefs, and customs of the author and the original audience. What were their occupations, religion, family structures, politics, and art? Of the five contexts, this one is the most difficult and the most important. There is so much to learn, and one overlooked cultural fact can change the meaning of a text.

When I spent six weeks in India, our team was trained to never touch any person or any food with our left hand, because the left hand is used for hygiene after using the restroom and is considered unclean. Imagine if a custom like that lay behind a biblical passage and we modern Western readers knew nothing about it. We would completely miss the point.
Take Jeremiah 10:1-5. I have heard sermons that use this passage to condemn Christmas trees, since it mentions cutting down a tree, decorating it with silver and gold, and fastening it with nails. But Christmas trees were not even invented until thousands of years later. Jeremiah is mocking the practice of carving a tree into an idol, covering it with precious metal, nailing it down so it does not fall over, and then praying to it. It is a warning about idolatry, not about Christmas trees. I explain this further in Are Christmas Trees Idols?
Studying the historical-cultural context is like building a time machine. It lets us go back and sit with the original audience, so that we can hear the words the way the author intended them to be heard.
2. The Literary Context
The literary context asks what kind of writing we are reading and where the passage fits within the book. The Bible contains many genres: historical narrative, law, poetry, wisdom, prophecy, gospel, epistle, and apocalyptic literature. And here the basic rule of all Bible study applies: read the Bible as you would read any other book. Nobody reads a history book the same way they read a book of poetry. We should not read the Psalms the same way we read Romans, or Revelation the same way we read Acts.

What Kind of Writing Is Genesis 1?
Genre matters a great deal in Genesis 1. People argue about whether Genesis 1 is scientifically accurate, but it is not a science textbook. It is a theological polemic against the religious beliefs of Egypt, Babylon, and Canaan. After Israel left Egypt, they wanted to know what their God was like and how He compared to the gods of the nations around them. Genesis 1 answers that question. When we read it as the kind of literature it is, the debate with science largely goes away, and the message of the chapter comes into focus.
The literary context also includes the flow of the book. Remember Acts 1:8? It gives us the outline for the entire book of Acts. The gospel goes out to Jerusalem (Acts 1–7), to Judea and Samaria (Acts 8–12), and to the end of the earth (Acts 13–28).
3. The Grammatical Context
The grammatical context looks at the words, sentences, and paragraphs of the text. You do not need to know Greek or Hebrew to do this well. A good literal translation, such as the NKJV, NASB, or NRSV, lets you see most of the grammar in English. Ask what words are used, what they mean, and how they fit together into sentences, paragraphs, and books.
For example, Matthew 28:19-20 seems to contain four commands: go, make disciples, baptize, and teach. But in the grammar of the sentence, “make disciples” is the main verb. Going, baptizing, and teaching describe how disciples are made.
Even punctuation matters, though the original manuscripts had none. Some translations of Ephesians 4:12 put a comma after “saints,” so that church leaders are given three jobs: equip the saints, do the work of ministry, and build up the body. Without that comma, the leaders equip the saints, and the saints do the work of ministry. The surrounding context, especially Ephesians 4:16, where every part of the body does its share, shows that the second reading is correct.
Word Studies in Context
When I teach on this, I often write the word “trunk” on a whiteboard and ask people to draw it. I get tree trunks, elephant trunks, car trunks, storage trunks, and swimming trunks. Words have a range of meanings, and context tells us which one the author intends. If I say, “Big Mac drove his big Mac to McDonald’s to eat a Big Mac,” you know exactly what each “Big Mac” means.

The same is true in Scripture. Many Christians assume that the word “saved” always means “going to heaven when you die.” But when the disciples cried out in the storm, “Lord, save us!” (Matt 8:25), they did not want to go to heaven. They wanted to keep from drowning. When we let context define our words, passages like Romans 10:9-10 begin to make sense. I explain that text in Do I need to confess Jesus to be saved?
4. The Theological Context
The theological context recognizes that Scripture does not contradict Scripture. When we find two passages that seem to disagree, the problem is not with the Bible, but with our understanding of one or both texts. So we compare Scripture with Scripture, and let the clearer passages help explain the more difficult ones.
For example, Exodus 20:5 says that God visits “the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generations.” But Ezekiel 18:20 says, “The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son.” Is Ezekiel correcting Moses? No. Ezekiel is talking about guilt, while Exodus is talking about the consequences of sin. God does not hold children guilty for their parents’ sins, but the destructive consequences of sin often spill over onto the next generation. Both texts are true.
5. The Christological Context
The final context is the most important of all. The Christological context is the truth that Jesus is the lens through which we read all of Scripture. Jesus said that the Scriptures testify of Him (John 5:39). He is the One who reveals the Father (John 1:18; 14:9), the image of the invisible God (Col 1:15), and the exact representation of His nature (Heb 1:3). The Bible is the Word of God in black and white; Jesus is the Word of God in flesh and blood.

This means that Jesus is the trump card of Bible study. No matter which text we study, we ask: Does this look like Jesus? If not, how can we understand it in light of Jesus? If your interpretation of Scripture does not look like Jesus, you have not properly interpreted Scripture. This matters most when we read the violent passages of the Old Testament, which I discuss in Jesus as the Hermeneutical Trump Card in Scripture and in my book The Atonement of God.
Keep Looking at the Fish
Reading the Bible in context takes time, but anyone can learn to ask these questions. Like the student with Professor Agassiz, never stop observing the context of any passage you study, and never think you have discovered all there is to learn. The more we look, the more we see. If you want a simple step-by-step method to go with these five contexts, see How I Study the Bible (in 10 Steps).
Learn How to Study the Bible
If you want to go deeper, I cover all five contexts, along with my full method for studying Scripture, in my book, How Do I Study the Bible? It includes my complete list of observations on Acts 1:8, more examples from each context, and practical steps you can use in your own study. Get How Do I Study the Bible? on Amazon and start reading Scripture with fresh eyes.
And if you want to study the Bible with others who are asking the same questions, join the RedeemingGod.com Discipleship group. Members get access to the online discipleship community, free eBooks, audio lessons, and my online Bible and theology courses, including How to Study the Bible.




















