Redeeming God

Liberating you from bad ideas about God

Learn the MOST ESSENTIAL truths for following Jesus.

Get FREE articles and audio teachings in my discipleship emails!


  • Join Us!
  • Scripture
  • Theology
  • My Books
  • About
  • Discipleship
  • Courses
    • What is Hell?
    • Skeleton Church
    • The Gospel According to Scripture
    • The Gospel Dictionary
    • The Re-Justification of God
    • What is Prayer?
    • Adventures in Fishing for Men
    • What are the Spiritual Gifts?
    • How to Study the Bible
    • Courses FAQ
  • Forum
    • Introduce Yourself
    • Old Testament
    • New Testament
    • Theology Questions
    • Life & Ministry
You are here: Home / Archives

Are All Gentiles Depraved in the Mind? (Ephesians 4:17-19)

By Jeremy Myers
4 Comments

Are All Gentiles Depraved in the Mind? (Ephesians 4:17-19)

Ephesians 4:17-19 is often quoted along with 1 Corinthians 2:14, 2 Corinthians 4:3-4, and Ephesians 2:1-5 as evidence that the unregenerate person has no ability to understand, comprehend, or respond to the truth of God and the gospel.

This I say, therefore, and testify in the Lord, that you should no longer walk as the rest of the Gentiles walk, in the futility of their mind, having their understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God, because of the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart; who, being past feeling, have given themselves over to lewdness, to work all uncleanness with greediness (Ephesians 4:17-19).

futility of the mind Ephesians 4

Note several things about this passage.

1. Paul is Warning Believers

First, Paul is calling upon his readers to stop walking in the way that other Gentiles walk. While Paulโ€™s readers are most likely regenerate, Paulโ€™s exhortation implies that walking in darkness is a distinct possibility for believers. This will be seen more later when we look at the Calvinistic doctrine of Perseverance of the Saints.

2. Walking in Futility is a Choice

knowledge ignorance futilitySecondly, however, and more to the point about Total Depravity, it appears that even these Gentiles who walk in the futility of their mind do so because they have chosen to do so. In Ephesians 4:17-18, Paul strings together several perfect participles, which means that they are dependent upon the time of the main verb in his statement. The main verb is the past-tense (aorist) found in Ephesians 4:19 where Paul says that โ€œthey have given themselves over.โ€ In other words, this means that the reason these Gentiles are futile in their minds, have their understanding darkened, have blindness of their heart, and are past feeling, is because they gave themselves over to lewdness, uncleanness, and greediness.

There is no doctrine of Total Depravity or total inability here. What there is, however, is the all-important biblical message that first we make our choices, and then our choices make us. Paul is saying that the Gentiles of whom he is speaking made the conscious choice to live in sin, and as a result, they have become darkened in their mind, feelings, and understanding. We might say that their conscience is seared, that they live in willful ignorance, and their past choices are reaping present results.

Both Believers and Unbelievers Choose to Live in the Futility of their Mind

Based on this understanding, it only makes sense then, that Paul warns his believing readers to not make the same choices. Choices for sin, though they do not cause someone to lose their eternal life once they have it, can cause serious long-term consequences in the life of the believer. Paul wants his readers to put off that old way of conduct, and live their new life in the Spirit with the new man which was created by God for righteousness and holiness (Ephesians 4:22-24).

Ephesians 4:17-19 is not teaching about Total Depravity or total inability, but about the devastating results of choosing sin over righteousness.

These truths apply not just to unbelievers, but to regenerate believers as well.

If you want to read more about Calvinism, check out other posts in this blog series: Words of Calvinism and the Word of God.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, Ephesians 4, Theology of Salvation, Theology of Sin, Total Depravity, total inability, TULIP

Did Martha actually believe what Jesus said in John 11:25?

By Jeremy Myers
34 Comments

Did Martha actually believe what Jesus said in John 11:25?

We are all familiar with the story in John 11 of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead in John 11 and the little conversation that Jesus had with Martha before He raised Lazarus.

John 11 Jesus Lazarus MarthaHere is how I have usually read John 11:39-44:

Scene: [Mary and Martha are upset with Jesus because they had sent a message to Jesus that Lazarus was sick (John 11:2), and Jesus had not come. Now, four days after Lazarus has died (John 11:39), Jesus decides to finally show up. Mary couldnโ€™t bear to face Jesus, but Martha went out meet Him (John 11:20).]

Martha: Too bad you didnโ€™t get here five days ago โ€ฆ when Lazarus was still alive โ€ฆ when we called you to come. Iโ€™m angry at you, but I still believe that God is with you (John 11:21-22).

Jesus: Your brother will rise again (John 11:23).

Martha: (Rolls her eyes and thinks, โ€œWhat a terrible thing to say at a funeral. How does that help me now?โ€). Of course he will, in the future resurrection along with everyone else (John 11:24).

Jesus: Iโ€™m not talking about the future resurrection event. I am talking about me. I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me, even though he dies physically, will then live physically, and will never die for all eternity. Do you believe this? (John 11:25-26).

Martha: Absolutely! Of course I believe that (John 11:27).

Scene: [Jesus goes and raises Lazarus from the dead. Big party ensues (John 11:41-44).]

Is that pretty much how you have understood this event, and especially the answer that Martha gives to Jesus in John 11:27?

Recently, I have begun to wonder if I have been reading this text wrong all along.

John 11:27 and John 21:15-17

What got me wondering is the little conversation Jesus has with Peter at the end of John, where Jesus asks Peter three times โ€œDo you love me?โ€ and Peter answers three times, โ€œYes, you know that I love youโ€ (John 21:15-17)

We all know, of course, that the first two times Jesus asks Peter this question, Jesus uses the word โ€œagapeโ€ for Godโ€™s divine love, but Peter answers with โ€œphileo,โ€ which is brotherly love. The third time, Jesus uses โ€œphileoโ€ also, indicating to Peter that he knows that Peterโ€™s love will never be perfect, and thatโ€™s okay.

But what got me thinking was that with the first two questions, even though Peter said โ€œYesโ€ what he was really saying was โ€œNo.โ€ Jesus asked, โ€œPeter, do you agape me?โ€ and in saying, โ€œYes, I phileo you,โ€ Peter was actually saying, โ€œNo, I do not, cannot, and will not be able to agape you. But I do phileo you, and thatโ€™s the most I can honestly offer.โ€

The night of Jesusโ€™ crucifixion gave Peter a glimpse into his own soul, and he knows what resides there, and so he answers Jesus honestly.

Anyway, the fact that Peter says โ€œYes,โ€ but actually gives a modified โ€œNoโ€ made me wonder if Martha wasnโ€™t doing something similar in John 11, for if you look at the text carefully, she does not say that she believes what Jesus asks her. Instead, she states her belief in something else entirely, and in fact, a few verses later, when Jesus tells her to have some men roll away the stone, she proves that she did not believe what He said, because she argues with Jesus about rolling away the stone! This is where Jesus reiterates to her what He told her previously, that He was the resurrection and the life. If she had truly believed Him, she would not have argued with him later in the chapter.

Jesus Martha Lazarus

A New Reading of John 11

So now, I am wondering if John 11 could be read this way. The setup is the same, but the results are much different:

Scene: [Mary and Martha are pissed off because they had sent a message to Jesus that Lazarus was sick (John 11:2), and Jesus had not come. Now, four days after Lazarus has died (John 11:39), Jesus decides to finally show up. Mary couldnโ€™t bear to face Jesus, but Martha went out meet Him (John 11:20).]

Martha: Too bad you didnโ€™t get here five days ago โ€ฆ when Lazarus was still alive โ€ฆ when we called you to come. Iโ€™m angry at you, but I still believe that God is with you (John 11:21-22).

Jesus: Your brother will rise again (John 11:23).

Martha: (Rolls her eyes and thinks, โ€œWhat a terrible thing to say at a funeral. How does that help me now?โ€). Of course he will, in the future resurrection along with everyone else (John 11:24).

Jesus: Iโ€™m not talking about the future resurrection event. I am talking about me. I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me, even though he dies physically, will then live physically, and will never die for all eternity. Do you believe this? (John 11:25-26).

Martha: Thatโ€™s kind of crazy talk. Look, I believe you are the Christ, the promised Jewish Messiah. Isnโ€™t that enough? (John 11:27).

Scene: Jesus says nothing, but looks at her with love filled eyes. They travel to the tomb of Lazarus. Jesus weeps. The people wonder why Jesus, if He loved Lazarus so much, couldnโ€™t have healed him from his sickness (John 11:37).

Jesus: Take away the stone from the tomb (John 11:39a).

Martha: Are you okay Jesus? Heโ€™s dead. If you wanted to say your final goodbye, you should have done that four days ago when we called you. By now he stinks. Let him rest in peace (John 11:39b).

Jesus: Didnโ€™t I tell you that I am the resurrection and the life? You didnโ€™t really indicate that you believed me, but now I am going to show you that itโ€™s true. Tell them to roll the stone away (John 11:40).

Scene: [Jesus raises Lazarus from the dead. Big party ensues (John 11:41-44).]

There is something compelling to me about this reading, but the main problem I have with it is that it messes with my understanding of John 20:31.

But what about John 20:31?

In the past, I used to think that John 20:31 was teaching that believing that Jesus is the Christ was the same thing as believing in Jesus for eternal life. But now I am not so sure.

Maybe, if this alternative reading of John 11 is true, then an alternative explanation for John 20:31 is also required.

Maybe John 20:31 is not teaching that believing that Jesus is the Christ is the same thing as believing in Jesus for eternal life, but rather, believing that Jesus is the Christ helps lead a person to believing in Jesus for eternal life.

This, after all, seems to be what happened to Martha.

Jesus said to her, โ€œI am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will have eternal life. Do you believe this?โ€

She said, โ€œNo, but I believe you the Christ.โ€

Based on this belief, Jesus went on to show her that as the Christ, she could also believe in Him for eternal life.

Remember, at that time, most Jewish people thought that the Messiah, the Christ, would just be another human being with a special connection to God. They did not believe the Messiah would actually be God incarnate. Maybe Jesus is trying to move Martha from belief in Him as the Messiah to belief in Him as God in the flesh?

This also may explain why the apostles went about preaching what they did in book of Acts (see Acts 5:42; 9:22; 17:2-3; 18:5, 28).

Anyway, I am just curious what all of you think about that. Let me know!

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: belief, Bible Study, christ, eternal life, faith, John 11, John 20:31, Lazaraus, Martha, resurrection, Theology of Salvation

6 Principles of Non-Violent Resistance

By Jeremy Myers
16 Comments

6 Principles of Non-Violent Resistance

When faced with the question of how to deal with violence, most people think there are only two options: either be violent in return, OR lay down and die as a pacifist. There is, however, a third way, which is called “Non-Violent Resistance.” It is what was practiced by Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr., and so many other people throughout history. It is also the way of Jesus.

non violent resistance

I have been doing a lot of reading and thinking about this over the past six years or so, and some of what I have learned will find its way into my upcoming book about giving up our rights, but here is a post about non-violent resistance, and some of the principles involved for living this way.

Though I do not have the time or space in the conclusion to this chapter to fully explain non-violent resistance, let me present a few of the guiding principles of this practice, and also suggest a few books so you can do further reading and research on your own.

1. Non-Violent Resistance Takes Courage

The first principle of non-violence is that it is only for courageous people who are willing to embrace it 100%. As long as there is the possibility in your heart of engaging in violence toward others, non-violence is not recommended. It takes great spiritual, mental, and emotional strength to engage in non-violent resistance, and must not be entered into lightly.

2. Non-Violent Resistance Seeks Friendship with Enemies

This leads to the second principle of non-violent resistance: Non-violence seeks to win friendship and understanding from enemies. It does not seek to shame or humiliate enemies, but to redeem and reconcile them to us, and to each other.

3. Non-Violent Resistance is about Defeating Injustice

non violent resistance gandhiThis is important because of the third principle of non-violent resistance, which is that we are not seeking to defeat people but to defeat injustice. Non-violence recognizes that those who perpetrate violence are victims of violence as well.

4. Non-Violent Resistance believes that Suffering Can Educate

Fourth, non-violence holds that suffering can educate and transform individuals and societies if those who engage in non-violent resistance accept violence toward them without retaliating violently toward others. Countless examples throughout history reveal that unearned suffering is redemptive and has tremendous educational and transformative possibilities.

5. Non-Violent Resistance Chooses Love over Hate

Fifth, non-violent resistance always chooses love instead of hate. Since love is unmotivated, unselfish, creative, and always seeks the good of others, those who practice non-violence will return good for evil and forgiveness for hate.

6. Non-Violent Resistance Recognizes that God is on the Side of All

Finally, those who practice non-violent resistance recognize that despite the rhetoric of war, God is on the side of justice, not just for one party or another, but for all. Though it may take time, justice will always win.

If you want to learn more about non-violent resistance, what it is, and how to practice it as a follower of Jesus, I recommend these books:

  • โ€œThe Powers Trilogyโ€ by Walter Wink
  • Fight by Justin Sprinkle
  • A Faith Not Worth Fighting For edited by York Tripp and Justin Barringer
  • Stride Toward Freedom Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

What are your thoughts on non-violent resistance? Have you heard of it? Does it “work”? Does it even matter if it “works”? Do you think you have the courage to resist evil and violence in this way (I do not think I do)?

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Books I'm Reading, Discipleship, evil, Gandhi, Jesus, Martin Luther King, non-violent resistance, pacifism, violence

Is faith the gift of God in Ephesians 2:8-9?

By Jeremy Myers
19 Comments

Is faith the gift of God in Ephesians 2:8-9?

Ephesians 2:8-9 faith a gift of GodThough many Calvinists use Ephesians 2:5 and Ephesians 2:8-9 to teach that โ€œregeneration precedes faithโ€ and โ€œfaith is a gift of God,โ€ a careful examination of these texts reveals that they teach the opposite.

The understanding of both texts builds upon what Paul wrote in Ephesians 2:1-3. If you do not recall how those verses are to be understood, you may want to go review that postย before reading further in this one.

Here is what Paul writes in Ephesians 2:5, 8-9:

[God] โ€ฆ even when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved) โ€ฆ (Ephesians 2:5).

For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast (Ephesians 2:8-9).

Ephesians 2:5 Does not Teach that Regeneration Precedes Faith

To begin with, Ephesians 2:5 does seem to support the idea that regeneration precedes faith. After all, Paul has just explained that even though all of us were dead in our trespasses and sins (Ephesians 2:1, 5), and now he says that God, out of His great mercy and love, made us alive together with Christ. There is no mention here of faith in Jesus Christ, but only the grace of God.

However, this is a classic example of a verse that, when taken out of contexts, sounds like it is teaching the opposite of what it really is.

Godโ€™s activity in salvation is the theme of Ephesians 2:1-10. In this passage, Paul takes his readers from the depths of sin in Ephesians 2:1 to the heights of Godโ€™s righteous plan for our lives from before the foundations of the world in Ephesians 2:10.

The โ€œsalvationโ€ in this passage, by the way, fits the same definition we saw earlier in this series (see the definition of “saved”). Salvation in Ephesians 2:1-10 is not simply justification or receiving eternal life, but also includes sanctification (Ephesians 2:10) and glorification (Ephesians 2:6).

So when Paul writes in Ephesians 2:5 about God raising us up in Christ, he is not stating everything there is to know about being raised up to new life, but is simply introducing a theme which he will explain further in the following verses. After a brief explanation about what this life in Christ, this โ€œsalvationโ€ entails (Ephesians 2:6-7), Paul picks back up the โ€œby grace you have been savedโ€ statement in Ephesians 2:8-9 and explains it further.

And what is it Paul says? He modifies what he wrote in Ephesians 2:5 by pointing out four additional things about this life which we received by the grace of God: He says this life is also (1) through faith, (2) is not of yourselves, (4) it is a gift of God, and (3) is not by works.

Chiastic Structure of Ephesians 2:8-9

You may notice a bit of a chiastic structure in these four items, where โ€œthrough faithโ€ is further explained by โ€œnot by worksโ€ and โ€œnot of yourselvesโ€ is further explained by โ€œit is a gift of God.โ€

Main Point: By grace you have been saved

A ย Through Faith
B ย Not of yourselves
B’ The gift of God
A’ Not by Works

This helps us see several beautiful things about Paulโ€™s point.

Faith Results in Regeneration

First, by clarifying as he has about how this life is received, Paul clearly puts faith prior to regeneration. By stating that we are โ€œsaved through faith,โ€ Paul indicates that faith is a condition to receiving new life in Christ.

Yes, there would be no life whatsoever without the grace of God, but in the same way, God does not force His life on others without them first believing in Jesus for it. Regeneration does not precede faith; faith precedes regeneration.

Faith is Contrasted To Works

Secondly, Paul is clearly contrasting faith and works, as he does elsewhere in his writings (cf. Rom 4:4-5). As seen above, Calvinists sometimes argue that faith would be meritorious if people could believe in Jesus for eternal life, and therefore, faith is a work. Paul does not agree. By contrasting faith with works, Paul shows that the life we receive from God is not by works, but it is by faith.

salvation is not by worksIf faith were a workโ€”even if it was a work of Godโ€”Paulโ€™s point would be reduced to gibberish for he would be saying that salvation is not by works but it is by the work of faith. When we allow the clear contrast between faith and works to stand, Paulโ€™s points is clearly seen.

Yes, we cannot in any way work to earn or merit eternal life in Christ. We can, however, believe in Jesus for eternal life. Faith is not a work, but it is the avenue by which we receive the life of Christ.

Salvation Originates With God

Finally, the middle two items of the chiasm reveal that this salvation package from God did not originate with man, but with God. It is His gift to humanity.

As can be seen through comparative religion, no human philosopher or religious leader has ever invented the idea that God fully and freely accepts human beings without any effort or work on their part. Instead, every human philosophy and religious system is filled with ideas about working our way back into the good graces of whatever deity is being worshipped, and about pleasing and appeasing the gods who are angry with us. It is about sacrifice, fear, and effort.

But not so with the God revealed in Jesus Christ! He gives the salvation packageโ€“from sin and death and slavery to exaltation in the heavens (Ephesians 2:1-3, 6-7)โ€”freely, by His grace, without any human works, effort, or sacrifice involved. No human could have dreamed this up, but God did, and God gave this revelation to us as a gift.

Is Faith the Gift of God in Ephesians 2:8-9?

This then leads us to understand what Paul is referring to when he says โ€œit is the gift of Godโ€ in Ephesians 2:8. Again, many Calvinists look at this verse and notice that a few words earlier, Paul mentioned faith, and based on this, argues that โ€œfaith is the gift of God.โ€ But this cannot be.

faith is a giftIn Greek, pronouns must agree with their antecedent in gender and number. English somewhat does this with pronouns like โ€œheโ€ and โ€œsheโ€ but other pronouns like โ€œtheyโ€ and โ€œitโ€ are more difficult to determine. No so in Greek. All pronouns in Greek have gender and number, and they must always agree in gender and number to the noun they are pointing to, whether it is masculine, feminine, or neuter.

In Ephesians 2:8-9, the word โ€œthatโ€ (Gk., toutล) is neuter, but the word โ€œfaithโ€ (Gk., pistis) is feminine. So also is โ€œgraceโ€ (Gk., charis). In fact, if we keep looking for a neuter noun to which the pronoun โ€œthatโ€ can refer, we will search in vain. There are neuter nouns in the context, but they make no sense as an antecedent. So when Paul says โ€œand that โ€ฆ is the gift of God,โ€ to what is he referring?

Five Views on What is the “Gift of God”

There are five views on how to understand Paulโ€™s statement.

1. Faith is the Gift of God

First, some just say that Ephesians 2:8 contains a grammar mistake or an exception to the rule. They argue that contextually, the word โ€œthatโ€ refers to faith, regardless of the fact that this contradicts basic rules of Greek grammar.

In this view, Paul is saying, โ€œFor by grace you have been saved through faith, and faith is not of yourselves, faith is the gift of God.โ€

2. Grace is the Gift of God

The second view is similar, but argues that instead of โ€œfaith,โ€ the pronoun refers to โ€œgrace.โ€ Again, those who hold this view must argue that the verse contains a grammatical mistake or an exception to the rule.

In this second view, Ephesians 2:8 says this: โ€œFor by grace you have been saved through faith, and grace is not of yourselves, grace is the gift of God.โ€

Neither option is likely, since this sort of basic grammatical mistake is not found elsewhere in Scripture, nor is there any example of this โ€œexception to the ruleโ€ being used elsewhere.

3. Faith is Especially the Gift of God

The third view is that Paul is using the phrase โ€œand thatโ€ (Gk., kai toutล) in an adverbial way, to add emphasis to โ€œfaith.โ€ In this view, Ephesians 2:8 could be read this way: โ€œFor by grace you have been saved through faith, and it is especially not of yourselves, it is especially the gift of God.โ€

The idea is that Paul specifically and intentionally changed the case of the pronoun to add force and emphasis to what he was writing about faith being a gift. However, in the twenty-two instances where the phrase โ€œand thatโ€ is found, none of them change the gender for emphasis. This view seems to be a case of desperately reading oneโ€™s theology into a text in order to force it to say what you want.

4 and 5. The “Salvation Package” is the Gift of God

The fourth and fifth views are similar. Both views note that the neuter demonstrative pronoun โ€œthatโ€ (Gk., toutล) can refer to a concept or phrase, rather than to a single word. Where it refers to a multi-word concept, the gender of the pronoun remains neuter, regardless of the gender of the antecedent (cf. Luke 3:20; 5:6; John 11:28; 18:38; 20:20; Acts 7:60; 1 Cor 7:37; Php 1:9, 28; Heb 6:3).

Based on this observation, the fourth view is that the pronoun is referring to the entire โ€œby grace you have been saved through faithโ€ concept, and the fifth view is that the pronoun only refers to the concept which Paul has stated twice in the context, namely, โ€œby grace you have been savedโ€ (Ephesians 2:5, 8).

“By Grace You Have Been Saved” … is the Gift of God

It seems that one of these two final views is the best, but which? Those who argue for the first view are still able to say that faith is a gift of God to the unbeliever because it too is part of the package of โ€œby grace you have been saved through faithโ€ which was given by God. Of course, even if this fourth view is correct, it does not necessarily require faith itself to be a gift of God.

If this fourth view is correct, Paul could simply be saying that the gift of God is the entire plan of salvation, which means that God decided before the foundation of the world to make salvation available by His grace and through human faith.

by grace you have been savedNevertheless, it seems best to adopt the fifth and final view, for it not only places emphasis on the conceptual phrase which Paul has stated twice, but it also takes notice of the chiastic structure which Paul uses to further explain the gift of God.

As seen in the chiastic structure noted above, the parallel statements โ€œnot of yourselves โ€ฆ the gift of Godโ€ are not explaining โ€œfaithโ€ but are explaining โ€œby grace you have been saved” (See the excellent article by Rene Lopez called “Is Faith a Gift from God?“).

In this case, we once again see that the salvation-by-grace package originated with God in eternity past, is received by human faith (not by works), and is not something that we dreamed up, but is a gift of God to all people. This seems to be the best way to understand Ephesians 2:8-9.

In Ephesians 2, then, Paul is not teaching total depravity, total inability, that regeneration precedes faith, that faith is a work, or that faith is a gift. When properly understood in itโ€™s historical, cultural, grammatical, and contextual contexts, Ephesians 2 is a chapter which does not defend the Calvinistic system of theology, but disproves it at every turn.

If you want to read more about Calvinism, check out other posts in this blog series: Words of Calvinism and the Word of God.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, Ephesians 2:8-9, faith, gift of God, Theology of Salvation, Total Depravity, total inability, TULIP

The Secret Logic Behind Total Depravity

By Jeremy Myers
17 Comments

The Secret Logic Behind Total Depravity

regeneration precedes faith

OK, so it’s not that much of a secret, but there still are some things about Total Depravity that Calvinists will often not say when they are first presenting their views to others. To really get at the ideas below, you have to know what questions to ask.

Total depravity sounds biblical until you start to dig around in it and see all the secret logic that goes with it.

So next time you hear a Calvinist talk about Total Depravity, ask some of the hard questions, and see what they say!

The secret logic behind Total Depravity is as follows:

1. People Cannot Do Anything Good for God

First, as sinful, unregenerate human beings, people can do nothing good for God, nothing to earn or merit eternal life, and nothing which might put them in Godโ€™s good graces.

Frankly, I agree with this, as do most Christians. It is because Calvinists use this widely-accepted Christian idea that their system of beliefs gains acceptance as well. Usually, once a Calvinist is able to gain assent to this first idea of their doctrine, they quickly move on to the second main point of Calvinism, that of Unconditional Election. We will look at this point in later posts,ย but for now, we need to slow down and consider several steps within the Calvinistic logic which occasionally go unmentioned.

2. Faith is a Good Work

Based on the idea that a person cannot do anything good to please or appease God or to earn eternal life, the Calvinist, if pressed, will say that this includes faith. They would argue that โ€œbelieving in Jesusโ€ is a good thing, and since we cannot do anything good, we cannot even believe in Jesus.

In this way, they are saying that faith is a good work, or that faith is meritorious. In an earlier postย we looked at several Calvinistic quotes which stated this very thing.

But of course, this is exactly where the discussion of Total Depravity begins to get off course. Faith is not a work, and is not meritorious. We will see why later in this series on Calvinism, but for now, let us continue to follow the Calvinistic logic.

3. Faith is a Gift from God

Following on the idea that faith is meritorious, and therefore impossible for an unregenerate person to do, Calvinists nevertheless recognize that there are scores of passages all over the New Testament which call unbelievers to believe in Jesus for eternal life.

So they say that since God requires people to believe in Jesus for eternal life, but knows that they cannot, God Himself gives the โ€œgift of faithโ€ to people so that they can then believe in Jesus. They have a couple texts they use to defend this idea, one of which is Ephesians 2:8-9, which will be consideredย tomorrow.

4. Regeneration Precedes Faith

Some people object, of course, to the idea of God giving the gift of faith to unregenerate people, for if unregenerate people can do nothing goodโ€”not even believeโ€”then the gift of faith to unregenerate people is worthless, for the unregenerate person would be able to do nothing with it.

total depravity

In other words, if unregenerate people can do nothing good, then they cannot believe even if God gives them the gift of faith. So to solve this problem, the Calvinist says that โ€œregeneration precedes faith.โ€ In other words, God regenerates a person before they believe, in order that they can use the gift of faith which He gives to them.

Again, there are numerous quotes in the postย called โ€œRegeneration Precedes Faithโ€ which allows Calvinists to explain this idea in their own words.

No matter how it is explained, however, this idea is more blatantly wrong than any of the other logical steps leading up to it. Scripture everywhere states that people are given life (or regenerated) in response to their faith; not as a precondition to it. In Colossians 2:12, for example, Paul states that we were raised with Christ (that is regenerated, or โ€œmade alive,โ€ 2:13), through faith (cf. John 3:16-17; Acts 5:32; 15:7-9; 16:30; 1 Pet 1:22). People are regenerated by God because they believe; not so that they can believe.

One of the key texts to support his idea is Ephesians 2:5, which we will look at tomorrow.

Was Any of this a Secret to You?

If you have done much reading on Calvinism, none of this was probably new to you. But if you haven’t read much about Calvinism, was any of this new? Had you heard any of this before? What are your initial thoughts? Let me know in the comment section!

God is z Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, faith, regeneration, Theology of Salvation, Total Depravity, total inability

What does it mean to be dead in sin? Ephesians 2:1-3

By Jeremy Myers
52 Comments

What does it mean to be dead in sin? Ephesians 2:1-3

Dead in sinThe passage that is used most frequently to defend the idea of Total Depravity is Ephesians 2:1-3 where Paul writes about people being dead in sin.

And you He made alive, who were dead in trespasses and sins, in which you once walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who now works in the sons of disobedience, among whom also we all once conducted ourselves in the lusts of the flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, just as the others (Ephesians 2:1-3).

How Calvinists Understand “Dead in Sin” (Ephesians 2:1)

Due to the popularity of this passage among Calvinists, it would be possible to produce scores of quotes from various authors and writers who quote this text as proof for their doctrine of Total Depravity and total inability. I have already listed several of these quotes in an earlier postย about how Calvinists understand the phrase โ€œdead in sin,โ€ so let me provide just a few additional quotations here which are fairly typical of how Ephesians 2:1-3 is understood.

The Calvinist often equates Paulโ€™s image of being dead in sins for total inability (Palmer, Five Points of Calvinism,ย 16-19; Spencer, TULIP,ย 35).

To be dead in sin is to be in a state of moral and spiritual bondage. By nature we are slaves to sin (Sproul, Grace Unknown,ย 130).

Now it will surely be admitted that to be dead, and to be dead in sin, is clear and positive evidence that there is neither aptitude nor power remaining for the performance of any spiritual action (Boettner, Predestination,ย 65-66).

Boice writes approvingly of John Gerstnerโ€™s idea that unregenerate humans are like zombies:

John Gerstner โ€ฆ compared Paulโ€™s description of our sinful state to what horror stories call a zombie. A zombie is a person who has died but who is still up on his feet walking around. It is a gruesome concept, which is why it appears in horror stories. But it gets worse. This upright, walking human corpse is putrefying. It is rotting away, which is probably the most disgusting thing most people can imagine. But this is a fair description of what Paul is saying about human nature in its lost condition. Apart from Jesus Christ, these sinning human corpses are โ€œthe living deadโ€ (Boice, Doctrines of Grace,ย 74).

The basic approach to explaining Ephesians 2:1-3 is to focus on the phrase โ€œdead in trespasses and sinsโ€ and then draw an analogy from this that just as physically dead people cannot do anything, so also, those who are โ€œdead in sinโ€ cannot do anything spiritually.

Those who are dead in sin are incapable of doing anything good, of comprehending the things of God, or of believing in Jesus for eternal life. In order to do these things, the Calvinist contends that the person who is dead in sin must first be regenerated by God, and only then can they believe in Jesus or obey God in any way.

Since Calvinists focus on the word โ€œdeadโ€ in their quotes, the best way to approach Ephesians 2:1-3 is to similarly focus on this word to see what it means. Rather than make this post too long, I refer you to yesterday’s post where we looked at the word “dead” in the Bible,ย and saw that the best definition and synonym for the word “dead” is “separated.”

dead in sin

What is Paul Saying in Ephesians 2:1-3?

This helps us better understand what Paul is saying in Ephesians 2:1-3. In Ephesians 2:1, where Paul says that as non-Christians, we were โ€œdead in trespasses and sins,โ€ he is not saying that we are unable to believe in Jesus Christ for eternal life, or that the capacity for faith is non-existent.

Rather, Paul is simply (and clearly) saying in Ephesians 2:1 that as non-Christians we were separated spiritually from God. As we saw in the discussion on Romans 7:15-20, those who are spiritually dead are separated from God and cannot interact with Him as they were meant to. But this says nothing about their ability or lack of ability to do anything good, let alone their ability or lack of ability to believe in Jesus for eternal life.

dead in sin Ephesians 2 1-3Quite to the contrary, in the immediately following verses, Paul writes that when we were dead in our trespasses and sins, God made us alive in Jesus Christ.

How did this happen?

It was not by regenerating us prior to us believing in Jesus for eternal life, but the other way around.

After stating that God made us alive in Jesus Christ (Ephesians 2:5), Paul explains that this life is given to those who believe (Ephesians 2:8).

Yes, the offer of eternal life by grace through faith originated with God (we will look at the so-called โ€œgift of faithโ€ of Ephesians 2:8-9 in the next post), but the fact remains that the way to be transferred from death to life is not by waiting for God to regenerate us, but rather by believing in Jesus for eternal life.

Rise Up, You Dead People!

We know that is what Paul means because he later calls on people to wake up and rise from the dead so that Christ may give them light (Ephesians 5:14).

If Paul really meant that the dead cannot wake from their sleep, cannot see the truth, and cannot hear the Gospel, how then could he call on the dead to wake up and respond to the offer of eternal life in Jesus Christ? He could not logically do so.

For Paul, those are dead in trespasses and sins can remedy their situation by responding to the call of the Gospel and believing in Jesus for eternal life. When this happens, God sends light and life into their heart and mind, so that they can respond further, and live in the way God desires for them.

Dead in Trespasses and Sins

So the one who is โ€œdead in trespasses and sins,โ€ is not unable to respond to the Gospel or believe in Jesus, for โ€œdeadโ€ does not mean โ€œnon-existentโ€ or โ€œunable,โ€ but refers instead to the separation from God that the unregenerate person experiences.

Paul himself described their condition earlier, when he said they were โ€œstrangers โ€ฆ without God โ€ฆ far off โ€ฆ alienated from the life of Godโ€ (Ephesians 2:12-19; 4:18). These sorts of synonyms reveal that being โ€œdead in sinsโ€ is not inability but separation. Nor is their situation is hopeless, for Paul invites those who are dead to awake, arise, and believe (Ephesians 5:14; 2:8-9).

If you want to read more about Calvinism, check out other posts in this blog series: Words of Calvinism and the Word of God.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, dead, dead in sins, Ephesians 2:1-3, Theology of Salvation, Theology of Sin, Total Depravity, total inability, TULIP

7 Uses of the word “Dead” in the New Testament

By Jeremy Myers
7 Comments

7 Uses of the word “Dead” in the New Testament

In the New Testament, the word โ€œdeadโ€ (Gk., nekros) means โ€œlifeless, useless, or separated.โ€ Never does it mean โ€œnonexistentโ€ (Vance, Other Side of Calvinism,ย 220).

Dead in sin Very rarely does it refer to something that is completely unable to act.

Examples of “Dead” in Scripture

So, for example, the prodigal son was โ€œdeadโ€ to his father while he was separated from him (Luke 15:24, 32). While the prodigal son was in the far country, he certainly existed and was certainly active, but was not functioning properly in his role as a son.

In James 2, faith is described as โ€œuselessโ€ and โ€œunprofitableโ€ when it is separated from works. Dead faith is not a nonexistent faith, but a separated or useless faith. This means that even Christians can have dead faith.

This idea is brought out by the Apostle John as well in the last book of the Bible, when he records the Letters to the Seven Churches. In Revelation 3, even living Christians can be described as โ€œdead.โ€ย  In the Letter to the Church of Sardis, the Christians are described as having life, but being dead, because there was a problem with their works (Rev 3:2-3).

In all these examples, the word โ€œdeadโ€ can be best understood as โ€œseparated,โ€ or โ€œineffective and useless at its intended purpose.โ€

7 Different Kinds of Death in the Bible

Once we begin to see that this is the definition of โ€œdeadโ€ in Scripture, we can discern at least seven different kinds of death (or separations) in the Bible.

  1. There is spiritual death, where the spirit is separated or cut off from God, and so is ineffective or useless in helping the person connect with God and live as they should (cf. Gen 2:17).
  2. There is physical death, which is where the body is separated from the soul and the spirit (Heb 9:27; John 11:11-17). It is physical death that most people think of when they refer to โ€œdeath.โ€
  3. Thirdly, there is eternal death, which is when a person is separated eternally from God (Rev 20:14; Matt 25:46).
  4. There is positional death, which occurs when believers die to sin as a result of undergoing death and resurrection through Jesus Christ (Rom 6:3-6; Gal 2:2).
  5. There is relational death, which occurs when we are separated from friendships and relationships as a result of sin (Luke 15:24; 1 Tim 5:6; Rev 3:2-3).
  6. Sixth, there is an operational death, which is when we are unable to function and operate for our intended purposes because we rely upon works of the flesh or refuse to act upon what we believe (Jas 2:14-26; Heb 6:1; 9:14).
  7. Finally, there is sexual death, which occurs when a personโ€™s sexual organs are no longer able to function as they were intended (Rom 4:17-19).

“Dead” Means “Separated”

As can be seen, in every single case, good synonyms for โ€œdeathโ€ might be โ€œseparationโ€ or โ€œuselessness.โ€

  1. Spiritual death is separation from God, or uselessness for God.
  2. Physical death is the separation of the soul from the body, and when this happens, the body become useless.
  3. Eternal death is separation of the body, soul and spirit from God forever.
  4. Positional death is separation of the believer from what he used to be in the old man, so that in our new man, are no longer useful for sin, death, and the devil.
  5. Relational death is the separation of fellowship from friends, family members, and even from God.
  6. Operational death is separation from right living, and a right testimony toward others.
  7. Finally, sexual death is a separation from the ability to physically reproduce.

Dead Does not Mean “Total Inability”

Obviously, none of these uses of the word โ€œdeadโ€ in Scripture imply โ€œtotal inability.โ€

Quite to the contrary, we often find that after people are described as being โ€œdeadโ€ in one of the ways listed above, they are then invited in the following context to turn from death and practice life.

So in passages like James 2:14-26 and Revelation 3:1-6, people are called to reverse their state of death by energizing their faith or repenting and returning to the way they used to live.

At the same time, when Paul writes that in Christ we are โ€œdead to sinโ€ (Rom 6:3-6; Gal 2:2) this does not mean that Christians have a โ€œtotal inabilityโ€ to sin, or that there is no sin in the Christianโ€™s life. Far from it! We all sin every day. What Paul means is that the Christian is separated from sin. We are no longer ruled by sin. We are no longer in bondage to sin. But we do still sin, as every Christian knows.dead in sin

I included this study here today because tomorrow we are going to look at Ephesians 2:1-3, which is a popular Calvinistic proof text for total depravity and total inability, and I wanted to get the definition of “dead” out of the way now. What are your thoughts on the word “dead”? When you read this word in Scripture, how do you understand it?

If you want to read more about Calvinism, check out other posts in this blog series: Words of Calvinism and the Word of God.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, dead, dead in sin, Ephesians 2, Theology of Salvation, Theology of Sin, Total Depravity, total inability, TULIP

Removing the Veil from the Gospel – 2 Corinthians 4:3-4

By Jeremy Myers
21 Comments

Removing the Veil from the Gospel – 2 Corinthians 4:3-4

gospel is veiled 2 Corinthians 4It is common among Calvinistic teachers and authors to say that the reason unbelievers cannot believe the gospel is because their minds have been darkened by the god of this age.

The primary proof text for this idea is 2 Corinthians 4:3-4.

But even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, whose minds the god of this age has blinded, who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them (2 Corinthians 4:3-4).

Calvinists focus in the statement about the minds of the perishing being blinded by the god of this age, and from this, teach that unregenerate people need the divine gift of regeneration before they can believe the gospel. Here is one such explanation from John Piper:

Since men are blind to the worth of Christ, a miracle is needed in order for them to come to see and believe. Paul compares this miracle with the first day of creation when God said, โ€œLet there be lightโ€ (Piper,ย Five Points, 34).

But if this is not what Paul is teaching in 2 Corinthians 4:4, what is he saying?

The Veil on the Gospel

First, as with all the other passages which Calvinists quote, it is critical to understand the surrounding context. In the immediately preceding passage, Paul is explaining that the new covenant in the Spirit has replaced the old covenant of the law (2 Corinthians 3:6). He goes on to say that even though the new covenant is exceedingly more glorious than the old covenant, the Jewish people do not accept it because their minds have been veiled (2 Corinthians 3:14-15).

In fact, Paul even says that their minds are veiled regarding the proper way to read the Old Testament as well (2 Corinthians 3:14). The only way to read the Old Testament, he says, is through Jesus Christ. If someone does not believe that Jesus is the Christ, the veil remains.

The Gospel is Veiled to those who are Perishing (2 Corinthians 4:3-4)

This helps us understand what Paul is referring to when he says in 2 Corinthians 4:3-4 that the gospel is veiled to those who are perishing, and their minds are blinded. While Paul could be referring primarily to the Jewish people who are still unable to properly read and understand the Old Testament because they do not read it through the lens of Jesus Christ, it seems more natural to read Paulโ€™s statement in light of his ministry to the Gentiles. โ€œThe โ€˜veilโ€™ doesnโ€™t just apply to Jewish people โ€ฆ it applies to people of all sortsโ€ (Wright, 2 Corinthians,ย 42).

Paul, as the apostle to the Gentiles, undoubtedly ran up against this blindness on numerous occasions, and he is providing a brief explanation here for why some people do not respond to the gospel when it is proclaimed to them.

How to Remove the Veil on the Gospel

Paul, however, does not say that these people can never believe and will never believe. Quite to the contrary, Paul has clearly stated how the veil is removed, thereby implying that it can be removed. How is this? Paul wrote in 2 Corinthians 3:16 that โ€œwhen one turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away.โ€ While initially it might seem that Paul is referring to the initial act of faith in Jesus Christ by which people receive eternal life, the following verse shows that this is not at all what Paul is referring to.

In 2 Corinthians 3:17, Paul clarifies that โ€œthe Lordโ€ he has just mentioned in 2 Corinthians 3:16 is not Jesus, but the Holy Spirit. He says, โ€œNow the Lord is the Spiritโ€ (N. T. Wright argues that the Spirit of the Lord is active in the fellowship of the saints, and this is where and how the veil is removed. See Wright, Paul and theย Faithfulness of God,ย II:726).

gospel is veiledWhat this means is that when Paul talks about blindness and the veil in 2 Corinthians 3โ€“4, he is not talking primarily about how a person receives eternal life by faith in Jesus Christ, but about all the other truths of the gospel which are contained in the rest of Scripture, and which are centered on the person and work of Jesus Christ.

The โ€œgospel,โ€ remember, is not simply the message that eternal life is given to those who believe in Jesus for it. This truth is central to the gospel, but it is not the entirety of the gospel. The biblical gospel contains everything related to the person and work of Jesus Christ and the ramifications of these truths for our lives as His followers.

With all of this in mind, what Paul is saying is that nobody can understand the gospel unless they turn to the Holy Spirit for illumination and guidance. Once we do this, He not only removes the veil from our minds, but also helps us live out the truths of the gospel so that we are transformed โ€œfrom glory to gloryโ€ (2 Corinthians 3:18).

In 2 Corinthians 4:4, Paul is saying that people who do not want to see the glorious truth of the gospel will remain darkened in their mind because the god of this age is certainly not going to reveal it to them. If they want to understand the gospel, all they need to do is turn to the Spirit of God for understanding, and he will remove the veil from their hearts and the blindness from their eyes so that they might be understand and obey the gospel of God. โ€œPaul knew that โ€ฆ the gospel could and did pierce the veilโ€ (Wright, 2 Corinthians,ย 42).

2 Corinthians 4:4 and the Light of the Gospel

That this is the proper way to read 2 Corinthians 4:4 is supported by the verse itself. Paul writes that those who are perishing โ€œdo not believe, lest the light of the gospel โ€ฆ should shine upon them.โ€ Paul does not write that they do not believe because they cannot believe, or because the god of this age is preventing them from doing so.

No, Paul says they do not believe, because they do not want the light of the gospel to shine into their lives, thereby calling them to submit to Jesus Christ and Lord and follow Him with all their heart, soul, mind, and strength.

Paul is not the only one to make this sort of statement in Scripture. The Apostle John writes similarly in his Gospel, where he explains that although Jesus came unto His own people, they did not accept Him (John 1:1-8). And why did they not accept Him.

John explains why later. He says that they did not accept Him because their deeds were evil and they loved darkness rather than light (John 3:18-21). They did not want the light to shine in their lives, because they knew that if it did, they would have to change their beliefs and their behaviors, and so they chose to remain in darkness. Nevertheless, such a condition is not permanent. Jesus himself says that veil of darkness can be removed when the gospel is preached (John 6:45).

All of this is exactly what Paul writes in 2 Corinthians 3โ€“4.

So does 2 Corinthians 4:3-4 teach the total inability of humanity? No, it teaches the necessity of the Holy Spirit to understand and live the Gospel.

If you want to read more about Calvinism, check out other posts in this blog series: Words of Calvinism and the Word of God.

God is z Bible & Theology Topics: 2 Corinthians 4:4, Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, Theology of Salvation, Total Depravity, total inability, TULIP

Thanks to my Book Launch Team (and an Invitation to you)

By Jeremy Myers
Leave a Comment

Thanks to my Book Launch Team (and an Invitation to you)

I had some people helping me promote a book this week.

As you may or may not know, I started a publishing company almost two years ago, and as part of the process of publishing and marketing books, I wanted to create a โ€œBook Launchโ€ strategy so that the authors whose books we publish could get a good start on helping people learn about their book.

book launch team

But before I used this Book Launch strategy on one of the books from the various authors we have published, I wanted to experiment with it using one of my own books first. So I chose Why You Have Not Committed the Unforgivable Sin and recruited ten people to help me spread the word about this book.

Of the ten who agreed to get a free book and help me spread the word about this book, here are the six who actually followed through (Thanks!):

  • Brandon Chase
  • Michael Wilson
  • Stan Stinson
  • Tony Vance
  • Bob Bedford
  • Jake Yaniak

Each member of this book launch team has a blog. Just click on their names to go check out their own writings. They all write fantastic stuff.

book launch authors

This Book Launch team helped me out this past week with this first Book Launch. They provided some insights and suggestions for changing future book launches, but for the most part, I think the Book Launch strategy is good to go.

I definitely need to tweak some things with the process,ย and so the next several launches will be somewhat different than the one I just finished.

Anyway,ย I am now accepting applications for future book launches. I need to replace the four who dropped out, and maybe a few more as well.ย ย I have four books ready to go now, and two more (hopefully) by the end of the year.

The next book I want to launch is a book called What to Expect from the Holy Spirit by Dr. Earl Radmacher. I want to launch this in LESS THAN TWO WEEKS!!!

If you want to learn more, just visit my Book Launch Team info page. See you there!

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Blogging, book launch team, Books by Jeremy Myers, Redeeming Press, Unforgivable Sin, unforgivable sin

Learn to Blog from the Masters

By Jeremy Myers
1 Comment

Learn to Blog from the Masters

Frank Viola is a top Christian author and blogger. He (along with Mike Morrell and a couple other bloggers) recently put out a blogging guide called “The Buzz Seminar.” They taught it life in Florida a while back, and have recently made the notes and audio files available for anyone who wants to purchase them.

Buzz Seminar

Now I’ll be honest, this blogging course has a bit of a price tag… (Go check it out yourself).

But as I read through the material and listened to the instruction about how to set up a top-ranked blog and write posts that engage with readers, I kept thinking to myself, “I wish I had known this ten years ago when I started this blog. I would have saved myself hundredsย of headaches and scores of costly mistakes.

Then I began to think about all the hundreds of hours I have spent over the past ten years trying to learn some of the stuff in this Buzz Seminar, and it dawned on me …

I asked myself, “If I could get all these hours back in exchange for the price of this course, would I do it?”

The answer was obvious:

Yes. Without a doubt, yes.ย 

The truth is that much of the material that is presented in this course can be found here and there on the internet. But to get at it, you not only have to know what questions to ask which authors are trustworthy, but you will then have to sift through thousands and thousands of web pages and articles, many of which contain contradictory and confusing information.

You could do that if you want.

Or…

Buzz SeminarYou could save yourself most of that time and frustration by learning to blog from those who have “Been there. Done that.”

Learn to Blog from Frank Viola

Why not let someone who knows what they are doing teach you what it is they have done?

In other words, why not let Frank Viola show you exactly how he gets the traffic he gets, grows his blog readership year over year, and gains the readers he does, all so that he can spread the message God has given him about the church and becoming a follower of Jesus Christ?

If you have a message to share with others, blogging is the best and easiest way to get that message out there. But despite what some may say, it is not true that “If you write it, they will come.” You also need to learn some “tricks of the trade” to getting your message out there and before the eyeballs of people around the world.

Let Frank Viola help you do that. Go sign up for his Buzz Seminar today.

But don’t wait too long. The course is only available for a limited time.

Do you have a blog? What was your biggest challenge in starting one? Do you want to start a blog? What is keeping you back?

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Blogging, blogging

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • …
  • 243
  • Next Page »
Join the discipleship group
Learn about the gospel and how to share it

Take my new course:

The Gospel According to Scripture
Best Books Every Christian Should Read
Study Scripture with me
Subscribe to my Podcast on iTunes
Subscribe to my Podcast on Amazon

Do you like my blog?
Try one of my books:

Click the image below to see what books are available.

Books by Jeremy Myers

Theological Study Archives

  • Theology – General
  • Theology Introduction
  • Theology of the Bible
  • Theology of God
  • Theology of Man
  • Theology of Sin
  • Theology of Jesus
  • Theology of Salvation
  • Theology of the Holy Spirit
  • Theology of the Church
  • Theology of Angels
  • Theology of the End Times
  • Theology Q&A

Bible Study Archives

  • Bible Studies on Genesis
  • Bible Studies on Esther
  • Bible Studies on Psalms
  • Bible Studies on Jonah
  • Bible Studies on Matthew
  • Bible Studies on Luke
  • Bible Studies on Romans
  • Bible Studies on Ephesians
  • Miscellaneous Bible Studies

Advertise or Donate

  • Advertise on RedeemingGod.com
  • Donate to Jeremy Myers

Search (and you Shall Find)

Get Books by Jeremy Myers

Books by Jeremy Myers

Schedule Jeremy for an interview

Click here to Contact Me!

© 2025 Redeeming God · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Knownhost and the Genesis Framework