Redeeming God

Liberating you from bad ideas about God

Learn the MOST ESSENTIAL truths for following Jesus.

Get FREE articles and audio teachings in my discipleship emails!


  • Join Us!
  • Scripture
  • Theology
  • My Books
  • About
  • Discipleship
  • Courses
    • What is Hell?
    • Skeleton Church
    • The Gospel According to Scripture
    • The Gospel Dictionary
    • The Re-Justification of God
    • What is Prayer?
    • Adventures in Fishing for Men
    • What are the Spiritual Gifts?
    • How to Study the Bible
    • Courses FAQ
  • Forum
    • Introduce Yourself
    • Old Testament
    • New Testament
    • Theology Questions
    • Life & Ministry
You are here: Home / Archives

How to be a Sheep (at the Judgment of the Sheep and Goats)

By Jeremy Myers
13 Comments

How to be a Sheep (at the Judgment of the Sheep and Goats)

Mike EhrhartThis is a guest post by Michael Ehrhart. Michael is the lyricist for the Christian rock group Beautiful Mess. Beautiful Mess is the brainchild of brothers Mike and Chris Ehrhart, fueled by the musical vision and leadership of Mikeโ€™s son, Tim. Their aim is to help bring truth to those searching and create a space for honest, open communication.

You may connect with Mike through the Beautiful Mess website or on Twitter @BeautifulMessP

If you would like to write a Guest Post for Redeeming God, begin by reading the Guest Blogger Guidelines.

Have you ever read the parable of the sheep and the goats in Matthew 25 and wondered whether you are a sheep or a goat?

You know the story. The nations gather before Jesus, and He separates them into two groups, the sheep and the goats. The deciding factor on who belongs to which group is whether or not they served others, and in so doing, served Jesus.

Here is what Jesus says to the “sheep” in Matthew 25:34-40 (NIV):

Then the King will say to those on his right, “Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.”

Then the righteous will answer him, “Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?”

The King will reply, “Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.”

first responders

First Responders

Lately, I have been thinking about this passage in the context of first responders in our communities. Do you know any first responders? These are the folks that charge into burning buildings, race to accident sites and protect others from the hostile. You ever wonder what makes them tick? I wish I knew. I am amazed at how they willingly put themselves at risk attempting to help and even rescue others for little or no personal gain.

They seem to have this fearless commitment to rescue, even when the the odds are against them. Think of 9/11. Think of the house fire in your community last winter. Think of the car accident last spring on that back road in the pouring rain.

Even when the prospect of success is dim, these first responders press on.

Iโ€™ve heard first responders say things like โ€œThere was a slim chance of rescue, but we had to try.โ€ Or โ€œWe didnโ€™t know if anyone was alive, but if we could save just oneโ€ฆโ€

You can be a First Responder

What if us regular folks took a first responder approach in our communities? That is, donโ€™t we know folks that need to be rescued? People that need to be assisted, or even carried, from their current situation because they canโ€™t escape on their own. How about people that need financial, or emotional wounds to be bandaged? Or people that need protection from verbal, emotional or physical attack?

Whether in our work, school, play, or even in our families, donโ€™t we know folks that need to be lifted up?

You probably can think of several, but my question is โ€œWho is your one?โ€ Like that first responder charging into that burning building, maybe you canโ€™t save everybody, but who is your one? Who is the one you wonโ€™t let be consumed by that addiction (drugs, alcohol, porn, work,)? Who is the one you will come along side and shepherd out of financial challenge? Who is the one you will stand in front of to protect from abusers?

Think about how our communities would thrive if the healthy, stable and strong just rescued someone that is within their reach.

Isnโ€™t this what Matthew 25 and the parable of the sheep and the goats is describing?

Being this first responder doesnโ€™t take a lot of money, a superior intellect or Herculean strength. Itโ€™s not like we need a new law or some great technology that hasnโ€™t been invented yet.

Who will you throw on your back and carry them from THEIR fire, THEIR car wreck, THEIR attack?

Itโ€™s a simple question that needs your answer. Itโ€™s a simple question weโ€™re compelled to answer by the scripture in Matthew. Whoโ€™s your one? Who is the one person you can love today?

How to be a Sheep that Follows the Shepherd

The true heroes in the Kingdom of God are not those who feed 10,000 people while the television cameras are rolling. The true heroes, the true sheep, the true followers of Jesus, are those who give a smile to the check-out lady, a word of encouragement to the troubled, a hug to the lonely, a cup of water to the thirsty, a cup of coffee to the cold, a meal to the hungry, and helping hand to the weary. These are things that can be done every day. These are things you can today.

The truth of the matter is that it is much harder to be a goat than a sheep. When you see a need, be a first responder.

To be a sheep that follows the Shepherd, all you need to do is find the one person He leads you to today, and love them in whatever way you can.

God is Redeeming Theology Bible & Theology Topics: guest post, Matthew 25:34-40, parable, sheep and the goats

4000 Books 2015

By Jeremy Myers
78 Comments

4000 Books 2015

I am one of those readers who reads with a pen in hand. I almost cannot read a book unless I am underlining statements and scribbling in the margins. This slows down my reading speed significantly, but I think it helps sharpen my mind and interact with the ideas of others.

My goal is to read 4000 books in my lifetime, and these posts keep track of my progress.

reading books

One of the things I have also done in recent years on this blog is keep track of which books I read.

I own more books than I can read in a lifetime (which I find highly depressing), and so I have begun to weigh the pros and cons of any book I read. In fact, as I was reading over the “Books I must read in 2014” I was sorry to see that I only read three of them. That is why I am not writing a similar list for 2015…

Here are the 4000 books so far:

  • Birth-2009 Estimate: ย 1500 (doesnโ€™t count childrenโ€™s books)
  • 4000 Books 2010: ย 45
  • 4000 Books 2011: ย 69
  • 4000 Books 2012: 52
  • 4000 Books 2013: 57
  • 4000 Books 2014: 57
  • 4000 Books 2015: See Comments Below
  • Total so Far: ย  1780

Some of these books make it onto my “Burning Books List: The Books Every Christian Should Read.” If you haven’t read the books on this list … well, you should.

What books have you read this past year which influenced your life and theology? What books are you excited to read in 2015?ย 

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: 4000 books, best books, Books I'm Reading, reading

I’m so tired of hate speech and guilt trips masquerading as the Gospel

By Jeremy Myers
86 Comments

I’m so tired of hate speech and guilt trips masquerading as the Gospel

angry preachers hate speechI listened to a sermon today in which the preacher (I’m not going to call him a pastor) said these things:

If you are going to follow Jesus, you need to stop hanging out with your non-Christian friends…

Gays are disgusting people…

God has called me to a new ministry…

On that last point, the preacher forgot to mention publicly that he got a $10,000 bonus for agreeing to go to this new area of ministry.

If I were a bolder person, I would have stood up and called him out on these points.

But I didn’t.

Instead, I took notes so I could write a blog post about it…

Look, here’s the point…

If you are going to preach hate, legalism, and self-righteousness, don’t do it in the name of Jesus, and don’t call it the Gospel. Of course, that’s probably asking too much.

When it comes to hate speech, legalism, and self-righteousness, Christianity has a corner on the market.ย 

The Gospel is good news. The center of the Gospel is the message of Jesus: that God loves everyone, has forgiven everyone, and extends infinite grace to everyone. If you claim to be a Christian but can’t preach that, it makes me think you don’t understand the Gospel.

God is z Bible & Theology Topics: Discipleship, evangelism, forgiveness, gays, gospel, grace, hate, homosexuality, love of God, pastoral ministry, Preaching

What does Jesus mean in John 6:44 when He says, “No one can come to me unless the Father draws him”?

By Jeremy Myers
79 Comments

What does Jesus mean in John 6:44 when He says, “No one can come to me unless the Father draws him”?

John 6 contains some of the most important texts on the topic of election. It is not uncommon for Calvinists to frequently reference some of the texts of John 6 in their defense of Unconditional Election. Here is what these verses say:

All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out (Johnย 6:37).

This is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day (Johnย 6:39).

No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day (Johnย 6:44).

And He said, โ€œTherefore I have said to you that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted to him by My Fatherโ€ (Johnย 6:65).

Jesus answered them, โ€œDid I not choose you, the twelve, and one of you is a devil?โ€ (Johnย 6:70).

As can be seen, several of these texts seem to pretty clearly state that God sovereignly chooses who will come to Jesus.

the father draws him john 6 44

How a Calvinist understands John 6:44

John 6:44 is especially strong, for Jesus says that no one comes to Jesus unless it has been granted to him by the Father. Palmer explains these texts in this way:

It is clearly seen that those who will be raised up at the last dayโ€”all true believersโ€”are given to Christ by the Father. And only those whom the Father gives to Christ can come to Him. Salvation lies entirely in the hands of the Father. He it is who gives them to Jesus to be saved. โ€ฆ This is nothing else than unconditional electionย (Palmer, Five Points of Calvinism, 27).

In a similar vein, though with much stronger words, the Calvinistic author Spencer writes this regarding his belief about what Jesus is saying:

It is tantamount to blasphemy for anyone to argue that man is capable, of his own free will, to make a decision for Christ, when the Son of God says in words that cannot be misunderstood, โ€œNo man can come to me, except the Father โ€ฆ draw himโ€ย (Spencer, TULIP, 42).

John 6:44 and the Choice of Jesus

Despite the risk of being accused of blasphemy for disagreeing with Spencer, there are two strong indications in this text that not all is as clear as the Calvinist would have us believe.

The first indication is in John 6:66 when some of those who were following Jesus did in fact turn away and stop following. If Jesus loses none of those who come to Him, how is it that some of those who came to Him stopped following Him? Did Jesus lose them or did He not? Or, as a third option, maybe something else entirely is going on in this text.

The second indication that something else might be going on is found in John 6:70. Calvinists who like to cite John 6:44 and some of the other verses in this chapter as proof for their doctrine of Unconditional Election almost never cite John 6:70.

If they do quote the verse, they usually only quote the first half of John 6:70. Those who quote the whole verse often do so in an attempt to prove reprobation, that God chooses some for eternal damnation.

I chose you
Calvinist love to quote this verse…. but only the first half.

In this text, Jesus says that He has chosen all twelve of His disciples, but one of them is a devil.

Understandably, this verse causes great problems for those who teach that Godโ€™s election is only to eternal life. Jesus clearly chooses Judas, just as He chooses the other eleven. And yet, Judas โ€œis a devil.โ€ This text either proves that reprobation is true, or that the choice, or election, of Jesus is not regarding the eternal destiny of people.

And in fact, since this entire chapter is about how followers of God become followers of Jesus, and since we have consistently seen in previous postsย that election is to service, it is better to understand John 6:70 in this regard, as well as the other verses in this chapter about those who come to Jesus.

The Choice of Jesus in John 6 cannot be to eternal life

If election is to eternal life as the Calvinist presumes, then John 6:70 contains the strange teaching that Jesus elected Judas to eternal life, knowing that Judas was (or will be) controlled by the devil.

Very few Calvinists would like to admit that Judas was elect, yet in John 6:70, Jesus clearly states that He chose all twelve, including Judas (cf. Luke 6:13). It makes much more sense to realize that election is not to eternal life, but to purpose and to service.

Only in this way can we allow for Judas to be chosen, or โ€œelectedโ€ by Jesus, for Judas did in fact serve a very special role and purpose within the ministry and mission of Jesus. All the apostles were chosen for a vocationโ€”including Judas. โ€œUnquestionably Judas shared the election of the other eleven (Luke 6:13; John 6:70)โ€ย (Klein, The New Chosen People, 270).

Jesus does not say, โ€œI have chosen eleven of you but the other is a devil.โ€ The election of Judas was no different from that of the others. โ€ฆ Election was not about whether a person went to heaven or to hell; it was the bestowal of an office and a taskย (Marston and Forster, Godโ€™s Strategy in Human History, 138).

So how then are we to understand what Jesus is teaching in John 6?

While Jesus does explain how a person receivers eternal life (cf. John 6:40, 47), the reception of eternal life is not itself connected with a sovereign decree or election of God.

Quite to the contrary, in the overall context of John 6, Jesus is explaining why some people follow Him as disciples and others do not (cf. John 6:60-71).

John 6 44So while the reception of eternal life by faith is mentioned in this passage, the overall theme is about discipleship. To be a disciple, of course, simply means to be a student, learner, follower, or apprentice. To be a disciple means to be taught by God, which is exactly what Jesus says in John 6:45.

Not all who have eternal life consistently follow Jesus in discipleship, and not all who are disciples of Jesus have eternal life. While it would be ideal for all believers to be disciples and all disciples to be believers, it does not always work out this way, as John 6 clearly reveals.

The various groups of John 6 could be pictured with a Venn diagram, where there is a group of people who believe in Jesus for eternal life but choose not to follow Him (John 6:60, 66), and there is a group who follow Him but who do not believe in Him for eternal life (John 6:70-71), but there is one overlapping group of people who both believe in Him and follow Him (John 6:68-69).

venn diagram on John 6

This sort of division in peopleโ€™s response to Jesus can be seen throughout the Gospel of John. (Of course, there is also a fourth group in John, which neither believes in Jesus nor follows Him.)

John 6, however, is not just about these various groups.

Those given to Jesus by the Father

In the events described in John 6, Jesus also explains why it is that some come to follow Him while others do not. Jesus states repeatedly in this passage that those who come to follow Him were given to Him by God the Father (John 6:37, 39, 44, 65).

These are the texts that Calvinists often cite as evidence for the doctrine of Unconditional Election.

But note that none of these texts are in reference to the people who believe in Jesus for eternal life. Jesus is speaking about those who become His disciples.

Note as well that the ones about whom Jesus is speaking in John 6 are all Jewish. Jesus is not making a blanket statement about all people everywhere who will come to Jesus. Instead, He is speaking specifically about why certain Jews follow Him while others do not. Jesusโ€™ explanation is that those Jewish people who come to Him are those who previously worshipped the Father. And now that the Father has sent His Son into the world, those who used to worship the Father are now directed by the Father to worship the Son.

In other words, God is giving His worshippers to Jesus. It is much like how the disciples of John stopped following him and became disciples of Jesus instead (cf. John 1:37-39; 3:25-30).

John 6 is a chapter about transition.

Jesus is explaining that those who hear and learn from the Father, will be instructed by the Father to hear and learn from Jesus (John 6:45).

Those who used to be disciples of God the Father, are now given to Jesus to be His disciples. In other words, those Jewish people who do not follow Jesus, simply indicate that they were not truly following God. They do not have eternal life, not because they were not elect, but because they would not come to Jesus in faith (cf. John 5:40).

Since Jesus is sent from God, those who follow God will now follow Jesus, and Jesus will not drop, reject, or lose anyone who comes to Him from God (John 6:39). All of this is reiterated and clarified in John 10 (which will be looked at in a future post), and the prayer of Jesus in John 17:2-24.

John 6 compared to John 17

John 17In John 17, Jesus uses very similar language as He uses here in John 6, but in John 17, He is speaking primarily about the apostles. These twelve were chosen to receive special revelation about God through Jesus Christ (John 17:6). They belonged to God, but were given to Jesus by God (John 17:9) so that they might behold the glory of God in Jesus Christ (John 17:24). And though they were given to Him, Jesus lost none of them, except for Judas (John 17:12).

Over and over again, using terminology very similar to that used in John 6, Jesus speaks of His twelve apostles and the special purpose, privilege, and service to which they were called. The primary subject of Jesusโ€™ teaching in John 6, 10, and 17 regarding the people whom God has given to Jesus are His apostles. โ€œA definite group is being given to Christ during his earthly ministryโ€”not before the foundation of the world. The ones given are Jewish disciplesโ€ย (Vance, Other Side of Calvinism, 344).

They previously belonged to God as His followers, but God gave them to Jesus so that Jesus could fulfill and complete His earthly ministry. Even Judas, though he was unregenerate, had a role to play. Judas too was chosen by Jesus. He too had a task or ministry to performย (Klein, The New Chosen People, 129).

Eternal life and Being Chosen for Service

Nevertheless, we cannot ignore that in the context of Jesusโ€™ teaching about those whom He chooses for service, He mentions the fact that He gives eternal life to those who believe in Him for it (John 6:40, 47). What is the connection between receiving eternal life by faith, and being chosen by Jesus for service?

It is this: While God sometimes sovereignly chooses individuals to serve Him in some special way, everyone and anyone who simply and only believes in Jesus for eternal life, will be accepted by God and given to Jesus for inclusion in His purposes in this world.

In other words, Jesus is saying that if someone wants to be chosen by God and given to Jesus, that person can simply believe in Jesus for eternal life. God will give such people to Jesus, and Jesus will lose none of them, but will raise all of them on the last day (John 6:40, 44).

Jesus teaches that a group of people are en route to a grand and glorious destinationโ€”resurrection to life everlasting. The Father has them in his care, and he has entrusted them to Jesus. They come to Jesus, and he will not turn them away.

Jesus assures his disciples that he will not lose any of these special ones; they will attain theย  resurrection. This is assured and even (pre)destined in the sense that Godโ€™s will has determined it all. But when we come to answer the question, Who is in this group? Jesusโ€™ response is, โ€œeveryone who looks to the Son and believes in himโ€ (John 6:40).

God gives to Jesus the company of believers. Jesus will never reject on who comes to him in faith. This is Godโ€™s will.

The Drawing of John 6:44

But what are we to make of the word โ€œdrawโ€ in John 6:44?

We discussed this text earlier in a post aboutย Total Depravity, but a few additional comments are appropriate here as well.

drag john 6 44Calvinists often point to this text, and then make the comparison between it and passages like James 2:6 and Acts 16:19 which uses the same word for โ€œdraggingโ€ or โ€œcompellingโ€ people to go where they do not want to go. Some scholars also point out that the word is used in classical Greek to refer to drawing water from a well. They then point out that nobody can โ€œwooโ€ or โ€œenticeโ€ water from a well; it has to be drawn up irresistiblyย (Sproul, Grace Unknown, 36).

Yet they fail to mention that the same word is used as well over in John 12:32 where Jesus says He will draw all men to Himself.

If the Calvinist really wants to say that the word โ€œdrawโ€ means that God irresistibly drags all the elect into eternal life, then they must also say that all men are irresistibly dragged into eternal life, which would make the Calvinist a universalist as well.

So which definition is correct? Does God irresistibly drag, or does God woo and entice?

The truth is that context helps determine which type of drawing in in view. Kittelโ€™s Theological Dictionary of the New Testament says this:

There is no thought here of force or magic. The term figuratively expresses the supernatural power of the love of God or Christ which goes out to all (12:32) but without which no one can come (John 6:44). The apparent contradiction shows that both the election and the universality of grace must be taken seriously; the compulsion is not automaticย (Kittel, TDNT, 227).

Jesus calvinist John 6 44
NO! He wasn’t!

Regarding the specific context of John 6, William Klein adds this insight:

Jesus issues an invitation in John 6:45 that clarifies the โ€œdrawingโ€ of John 6:44. Everyone (pas) who listens and learns from God comes to Jesus. Godโ€™s drawing is not selective nor irresistible. The โ€œdrawingโ€ stand right in their midst; in effect, Jesus is saying, โ€œNo one comes to the Father except through meโ€ (John 14:6). The attraction, the reasons, arguments, and features are all there. The question is: will the Jews really listen and learn from God?ย (Klein, The New Chosen People, 143).

Conclusions about John 6

When everything is put together, John 6 clearly teaches that being elected or chosen by God is not an Unconditional Election by God in eternity past to eternal life. Rather, election is to service.

Furthermore, one condition to being chosen by Jesus was to have previously been a faithful servant of God. Only those who belonged to God in this way were then given by God to Jesus for continued service. Jesus had a special task to fulfill, and God gave Him helpers to aid in that task.

Have you ever studied these texts in John 6 or had discussions about them with others? What is your understanding? Do you have any additional insights to add to the ones above? Share in the comment section below!

If you want to read more about Calvinism, check out other posts in this blog series: Words of Calvinism and the Word of God.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, election, John 6, John 6:44, Theology of Salvation, TULIP, Unconditional Election

When will God will gather His elect (Matthew 24:31)?

By Jeremy Myers
14 Comments

When will God will gather His elect (Matthew 24:31)?

One set of texts which are occasionally referenced in support of the Unconditional Election comes from the Olivet Discourse in Matthew 24. The reason these texts are cited is because they make reference to โ€œthe elect.โ€

And unless those days were shortened, no flesh would be saved; but for the elect’s sake those days will be shortened (Matthew 24:22).

For false christs and false prophets will rise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect (Matthew 24:24).

And He will send His angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they will gather together His elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other (Matthew 24:31).

These three texts clearly reference the elect, but we must remember that just because a Bible verse uses the word โ€œelect,โ€ this does not mean that the Calvinistic understanding of election is true.

One sometimes runs into Calvinists who argue that election is true because the Bible mentions election.

elect in Matthew 24

 

The question, however, is not whether or not the Bible mentions election, but rather what the Bible means when it mentions election.ย And when Matthew 24 refers to election, what it teaches is somewhat surprising, and in fact, seems to undermine the Calvinistic understanding of election.

Matthew 24 and Election

According to Calvinism, those who are elect are unconditionally chosen by God to receive eternal life. They are irresistibly brought by God into His family. Election occurs because a sovereign God rules and controls all.

Yet what is exceedingly strange in these texts from Matthew 24 which mention the elect, is that it appears that โ€œeven the electโ€ could be deceived and led astray by the false christs and false prophets that arise in the last days. If God sovereignly controls the beliefs and behaviors of His elect, then how is it that they could be deceived by false teaching? Indeed, Jesus says that God will cut short those days so that the elect will not die and will not be deceived.

To be even more specific, it is possible that when Jesus refers to โ€œthe electโ€ in this text, He might be specifically thinking of the Jewish elect people, so that when He refers to gathering the elect from the four winds, He is referring to gathering His people Israel back to Jerusalem from the four corners of the earth.

gather his elect

As a side note, it is important to recognize that when Jesus speaks about being โ€œsavedโ€ in this passage (cf. Matthew 24:13, 22), He is not referring to justification or receiving eternal life, but to being delivered from death in this time of tribulation. The salvation in Matthew 24 is not about going to heaven when we die, but is about deliverance from physical death during times of tribulation (Wilkin, Grace New Testament Commentary,ย 110).ย Paul makes a similar statement about the Jews in Romans 11:26-27.

So when it comes to the discussion of election, Matthew 24 really doesnโ€™t provide any new information about how one becomes elect or what interaction exists (if any) between the human and divine wills.

There is an indication that God does not sovereignly control the beliefs and behaviors of the elect, and since they themselves might be deceived by the false teaching of these last days, He intervenes to cut those days short, but other than this, there is little that this text adds to the discussion of election.

If you want to read more about Calvinism, check out other posts in this blog series: Words of Calvinism and the Word of God.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, election, Matthew 24, Theology of Salvation, TULIP, Unconditional Election

My Next Book is Available on Amazon

By Jeremy Myers
5 Comments

My Next Book is Available on Amazon

My next book is available on Amazon… but don’t buy it yet!ย 

Here’s what the cover looks like:

Dying to Religion and Empire

Oh, and thanks to everyone who provided input on the title for this book. What are your thoughts about how it ended up?

I suppose if you really want to go buy this book now, I won’t stop you, but I am going to do something special with this book in January… So stay tuned!

Of course, if you want a free digital copy of the book, I will send one out to everyone on my mailing list when I officially release the book in January… so if you are not already subscribed, do so today and use the sharing buttons below to tell your friends about it! ย Sign up below:

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: books, Books by Jeremy Myers, dying to religion and empire, ebooks, free books

What does “Many are called, but few are chosen” mean in Matthew 22:14?

By Jeremy Myers
16 Comments

What does “Many are called, but few are chosen” mean in Matthew 22:14?

In a previous post we looked at the statement of Jesus in Matthew 20 that “many are called, but few are chosen.”

This post looks at the identical statement in Matthew 22:14, which also follows a parable from Jesus.

The Parable of the Wedding Feast in Matthew 22:1-14

This parable in Matthew 22:1-14 is sort of two parables in one.

In the first half of this parable (Matthew 22:1-10), a king prepared a wedding feast and invited many people to the feast. When the day of the feast arrived, the king sent out servants to remind those whom he had invited that the day had come. Such double invitations are not uncommon in honor-shame cultures, for they allow the invited guests time to look over the preparations for the feast and who else is invited so that they can decide whether or not they will attend.

wedding feast Matthew 22In this case, all the guests decided to stay away, and provided their token excuses, which indicated their disapprovalย (Malina,ย Synoptic Gospels, 111).ย Also, many of them sized the servants of the king to beat them and kill them, which was a direct affront to his honor.

So the king sent out his servants again to find anybody he could who would attend his wedding feast. They gathered whomever they found, both good and bad, and brought them to participate in the joy of the king.

This first part of the parable is primarily about how Israel as Godโ€™s chosen people had been invited to participate in the party that accompanied the arrival of the Messiah. But when Jesus arrived, most of those in Israel wanted nothing to do with Jesus. So Jesus invited the sinners, tax-collectors, and prostitutes instead. The chief priests and Pharisees obviously did not like to hear this sort of message from Jesus and sought for ways to arrest and kill Him (cf. Matthew 21:45-56; 22:15).

The second half of the parable, which is almost a separate parable itself, is about a man who shows up at the feast without the proper wedding attire (Matthew 22:11-13). The king asks how the man got into the wedding without the proper clothing, and when the man is unable to provide an answer, the king has him thrown out of the wedding hall and into the darkness outside.

This seems strange to modern hearers, for what else could the king expect from people he had rounded up from the streets and back alleys? Why would a homeless man have proper wedding attire? The answer is that in such situations of the Mediterranean culture, the king would make sure to provide proper wedding clothes to all of his guests as they arrivedย (Malina,ย Synoptic Gospels, 111. Cf. also Stern, Jewish NT Commentary, 64, and Pilch, Cultural World of Jesus, 148-150).

So the kingโ€™s question to the improperly dressed man is not so much, โ€œWhy arenโ€™t you wearing the right clothes?โ€ but rather, โ€œHow did you get in here? If you had come in by the front gate, you would have been given proper clothing. The fact that you are wearing improper clothing indicates you came in by some other way.โ€

This is reminiscent of Jesusโ€™ earlier statement that only thieves and robbers enter a sheepfold by coming over a wall (John 10:1). Everyone else comes in through the front gate. The implication is that this man who was in the feast without the proper clothes was a thief who climbed in over a wall. Most ironically, of course, is that there were likely many thieves in the wedding feast, but they had come in through the front door and so were given proper wedding attire.

For Many are Called, but Few are Chosen (Matthew 22:14)

Following the conclusion of this parable, Jesus once again makes the statement, โ€œFor many are called, but few are chosenโ€ (Matt 22:14).

As with the previous usage of this summary conclusion in Matthew 20:16, Jesus is not saying anything one way or another about how God sovereignly chose some people to go to heaven while others go to hell.

In fact, though many read โ€œhellโ€ into Jesusโ€™ statement in Matthew 22:13 about the outer darkness and the weeping and gnashing of teeth, this imagery has nothing to do with hell at all, but simply portrays the profound regret which is experienced by those who are outside the hall of the wedding feast. They are not inside, with the food, the light, and the dancing, but are in the darkness outside. The weeping and gnashing of teeth is a Middle Eastern way of expressing regret and shame. The bottom line, of course, is that there is nothing in Matthew 22:1-14 about Unconditional Election.

Many were invited to participate in the feast, but only those who showed up and came through the front door got to join in the celebration.

This sort of a statement would have been offensive to many Jews at the time, for they considered themselves to be Godโ€™s only chosen people.

Jesus is not denying their โ€œchosenness,โ€ but is saying that if they do not live up to the reason they were chosen by God, which is to serve others and be a blessing to the world, then God will simply choose others, such as the prostitutes, thieves, and cutpurses. And if it is argued that they are not worthy, that they are not clothed in righteousness, Jesus says, โ€œDonโ€™t worry. Theyโ€™ll be given the proper attire as they enter into the wedding hall.โ€

wedding banquet Matthew 22 14

Jesus is saying that while many people were called to participate in His Kingdom, only those who show up are โ€œchosenโ€ to join in the festivities (Cf. discussion in Klein, The New Chosen People, 67-69).ย But you have to come in the right way, which is through the front door, for only in this way will the guests be properly attired to live, serve, and function within Godโ€™s Kingdom (See Capon, Kingdom, Grace, Judgment, 464-465).

There is nothing here to portray either calling or election as some kind of irresistible decree that a person should repent and believe (Marston and Forster, Godโ€™s Strategy in Human History, 164).

Many of those who were invited (called) to the wedding resisted the invitation, and those who came were given the proper clothing so that they might be full participants in the wedding celebration of the Kingdom of God. To participate in the Kingdom, you must be wearing Kingdom clothes.

The condition of the wedding garment is given as solid interpretation [cf. Matthew 21:31, 21:43], but because he brings disobedience to the wedding, and does not have the conduct which corresponds to blessing, he cannot be a real participant. Election is fulfilled only in obedience. Hence we do not have here a static doctrine of election but a dynamic theology which is oriented to the right attitude of the elect. To receive gifts is of no avail if there is no readiness to obey. Thus the concept of election is set in living history. It demands responsibility and decisionย (Kittel, TDNT, II:186).

In summary then, when Jesus says in Matthew 22:14 that โ€œmany are called, but few are chosen,โ€ He is not laying out the doctrine of Unconditional Election, but is saying that when God invites all to participate with Him in His rule and reign on earth, He does so without partiality or favoritism.

All are invited, and it does not matter who shows up first or last, all will be welcomed. Those who accept the invitation, however, must recognize that while they will be given blessings and benefits from the overabundance of Godโ€™s generosity, these blessings and benefits must be gained the right way (by entering through the front door, which is Jesus), and must be used in the service of others.

If you want to read more about Calvinism, check out other posts in this blog series: Words of Calvinism and the Word of God.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, chosen, election, Matthew 22:14, Theology of Salvation, TULIP, Unconditional Election

Would Jesus waterboard His enemies?

By Jeremy Myers
18 Comments

Would Jesus waterboard His enemies?

I have a confession to make โ€ฆ I want to be waterboarded. Is that sort of twisted?

waterboarding

I have real trouble believing that it is as bad as people make it out to be.

In fact, I did a quick search, and found a guy who got together with some friends so they could all waterboard each other. Howโ€™s that for an evening of fun?!

One of the comments on that post point out exactly what I suspect is the real reason waterboarding is considered โ€œtortureโ€ by some: the people doing it to you are your enemies and so there is no way to โ€œtap out.โ€ In reality, then, the real horror of waterboarding is almost entirely psychological.

Jesus andย Violence

So as I write the occasional post about how Jesus wants us to respond to various themes in our culture and society, I found myself wondering how Jesus would respond to the current question about waterboarding our enemies.

I wondered, โ€œWould Jesus waterboard His enemies?โ€

But donโ€™t laugh too quickly at such a ludicrous question.

Last week I published a post called โ€œDoes Jesus drown babies?โ€ and much to my shock, I had a couple of people leave comments to the affirmative, saying that they love and worship a God from the Bible who not only drowns babies, but slaughters them as well. Go read their comments…

I was talking with my wife about this, and said, โ€œThis is one reason there are atheists. If a baby-slaughtering god is the type of god we Christians present to the world, then it is no wonder that people want nothing to do with him.โ€

In my opinion, if god is a baby-slaughtering god, then rejecting him and facing the punishment of his hell is a more righteous act than worshiping him. If god is like Molech or Baal, then the atheist who rejects such a god is more honorable and righteous than the Christian who worships him.

But of course, I donโ€™t believe that god is like Molech or Baal. I believe that God is like Jesus.

Jesus and Waterboarding

So anyway, this brings me back around to the seemingly-ludicrous question, โ€œWould Jesus waterboard His enemies?โ€

Though there may be some Christians who would say, โ€œOf course!โ€ (Any of you out there? Please explain your position in the comments below!) I would answer the question negatively. I cannot imagine Jesus using โ€œenhanced interrogation techniquesโ€ on his enemies, even if such techniques are primarily psychological.

Instead, it seems to me that Jesus would untie his enemy, hand him the bucket, and then get down on the waterboard himself, saying, โ€œGo ahead. I forgive you.โ€

In fact, isnโ€™t that exactly what Jesus did do in going to the cross?

Jesus cross waterboard

We, who deserved to die for all the evil we have done in this world (and usually in the name of God), should have been the ones to go to one of the most painful and excruciating torture techniques invented by man โ€“ the Roman cross. But instead, Jesus got up there Himself and looked us in the face and said, โ€œGo ahead. I forgive you.โ€

So would Jesus waterboard His enemies? Of course not. He would let them waterboard Him. And, they would likely kill him in the process.

Jesus, Governments, and Waterboarding

Now, having said this, we must recognize that Jesus is not a government and a government is not Jesus. The question โ€œWould Jesus waterboard?โ€ is very different than โ€œShould a government waterboard?โ€ There is a vast difference (as Jesus and every New Testament author reveals) between the Kingdom of God and the kingdoms of this world.

The kingdom of God is lived out as individuals and small groups of Christ-followers practice the enemy-blessing example of Jesus. But since the kingdoms of this world are under the sway and dominion of the principalities and powers, we should not expect them to naturally adopt the values of Jesus.

As members of the Kingdom of God, we can (and should) call our human governments to a better and different way of living in relation to others, but we should recognize that change takes decadesโ€”even centuries!โ€”to occur.

This does not excuse our human governments for what they do, but it does help explain their actions. (There is so much to say here โ€ฆ about scapegoating, the myth of redemptive violence, and the role of religion in sanctioning state violence โ€ฆ but it simply cannot all be said. Instead, let me direct you to a few helpful books: The Myth of a Christian Nation, A Faith Not Worth Fighting For, The Powers Trilogy, and my own Dying to Religion and Empire).

So what can we say about our governmentโ€™s involvement in waterboarding?

waterboard

Look, violence of all sorts makes no sense when thoughtfully considered, but almost more silly are the politically-motivated objections to violence. Without the foundation of Jesus Christ, neither violence nor non-violence make any sense.

I find it quite interesting in the current debate about waterboarding and โ€œenhanced interrogation techniquesโ€ that many of the same people who are condemning the practice of waterboarding as a means to learn information about what our nationโ€™s enemies are planning, are the same people who, after 9-11, demanded to know why our nationโ€™s intelligence did not know that the 9-11 terrorist attack was coming.

I absolutely guarantee that if our country had not used the techniques it did to learn information that it did through techniques like waterboarding, and if another terrorist attack had occurred like the one on 9-11, the same people who are calling for an investigation into waterboarding today would instead be calling for an investigation into why our intelligence community failed to uncover this terrorist plot.

In other words, itโ€™s โ€œDamned if you do; damned if you donโ€™t.โ€

I am not defending waterboarding.

All I am saying is that this world is a messy place, and various governments do various things to further their goals and defend their people. Sometimes what they do is good, and sometimes what they do is evil, but most often it is a sad mixture of both.

So when it comes right down to it, while I think we can safely say that Jesus would not waterboard His enemies, this does not mean that in a sinful and chaotic world, human governments should not. In my opinion, waterboarding (along with sleep deprivation and other such techniques), is a form of psychological torture. But, as bad as this may be, such โ€œenhanced interrogation techniquesโ€ are better than physical torture techniques like flaying people alive, putting them on the rack, or slow-roasting them on a spit above a fire.

This is what we call progress.

Do you want to know why the world is seeing progress in how governments deal with their enemies? Because the rule and reign of God is expanding upon the earth. Because as Christians model the Kingdom of God in their own lives, and call others to do the same, the human kingdoms of this world see that there is indeed a better way, a more loving way, a way that does not degenerate into the vicious downward spiral of ever-increasing violence.

Believe it or not, the world is learning to look like Jesus by watching followers of Jesus live like Jesus.

Christians and Waterboarding

So should Christians waterboard others? Of course not! (Unless someone wants to come waterboard meโ€ฆ)

Should Christians call for our nation to treat our enemies with the dignity and respect they deserve as human beings for whom Jesus died? Yes!

Will our governments listen? No.

But they will observe our example.

Do you have Muslim neighbors or coworkers? Bless them. Love them. Serve them.

You see, the current problem the Western world faces with many in the Middle East has been centuries in the making. It will likely take centuries to correct it. And where do we begin? With you and me treating โ€œthemโ€ with love, generosity, and forgiveness.

Jesus never called governments to conform to His values and ideals for this world. But He did call you and me to follow His example, so that we can proclaim and advance the rule and reign of God on earth.

God is z Bible & Theology Topics: Discipleship, following Jesus, government, kingdom of god, looks like Jesus, reign of God, Theology of Jesus

What does “For many are called, but few are chosen” mean? (Matthew 20:16)

By Jeremy Myers
38 Comments

What does “For many are called, but few are chosen” mean? (Matthew 20:16)

At various times in Jesusโ€™ ministry, He made the following statement:

For many are called, but few are chosen (Matthew 20:16; 22:14).

This text is a tricky passage for Calvinists to explain because on the one hand, Calvinism often equates โ€œcallingโ€ with โ€œelection,โ€ and here Jesus seems to indicate that not all who are โ€œcalledโ€ end up being โ€œchosen.โ€ So for this reason, Calvinists often talk about a โ€œgeneralโ€ universal call to all people and an โ€œeffectualโ€ call to some.

John MacArthur, for example, in his commentary on the Bible, explains Matthew 22:14 by saying this:

The call spoken of here is sometimes referred to as the โ€œgeneral callโ€ (or the โ€œexternal callโ€), a summons to repentance and faith that is inherent in the gospel message. This call extends to all who hear the gospel. โ€œManyโ€ hear it; โ€œfewโ€ respond. Those who respond are the โ€œchosen,โ€ the elect. In the Pauline writings, the word call usually refers to Godโ€™s irresistible calling extended to the elect alone (Rom 8:30), known as the โ€œeffectual callโ€ (or the โ€œinternal callโ€) (MacArthur Bible Commentary).

Due the Calvinistic understanding of Total Depravity, the general call to all people cannot be heard or heeded by any person, which is why God must then issue an โ€œeffectualโ€ call, which is really just God specifically choosing to unilaterally redeem some people through Irresistible Grace.

Only those who are called with the effectual call of God are thus understood to be Godโ€™s elect. Given the Calvinistic system, there is no other way to understand Jesusโ€™ words in Matthew 20:16 and 22:14.

many are called few are chosen

Matthew 20:16 in Context

But once Calvinism is set aside, and the words of Jesus are reexamined in their contexts, we see that Jesus is not referring at all to the calling or election of some to eternal life. Instead, Jesus is teaching the consistent biblical message about the call and choice of God, namely, that while God desires that all people will serve Him, not all do, and so God chooses to work with those who participate with Him in what He is doing in the world.

The calling and choosing of God is not to eternal life, but to service in this world.

This explanation makes much more sense of the surrounding context of Matthew 20:16 and 22:14 than does the contrived theological distinction between a general call and an effectual call.

So what is Jesus teaching when He says that many are called but few are chosen?

To understand Jesusโ€™ words we must begin by seeking to understand His immediately preceding statement (in Matthew 20:16), that โ€œthe last will be first, and the first last.โ€ And this statement, of course, can only be understood in light of the parable of the workers in the vineyard that precedes it (Matthew 20:1-15).

parable of the workers in the vineyard Matthew 20 16

In this parable, the owner of a vineyard must harvest his grapes. So early in the morning he goes to the marketplace where day laborers waited to get hired, and hired those he found there. He offered them a denarius for one dayโ€™s work.

It soon became obvious that those he hired would not be enough to bring in the full harvest, so he went back to see if any others had shown up for work. Indeed, there more, and so he hired these as well. He did this throughout the day until the last group hired had only one hour of work left to do before dark.

When the work was complete, the workers lined up to get paid, and the owner paid first those who had been hired last. He gave each a denarius. Seeing this, those who had worked the entire day thought that when they were paid, they would receive more. But they too received a denarius. When they complained that they had worked all day and received only one denarius when those who worked only one hour had also received a denarius, the owner told them that they were paid what they had agreed to, and it should not matter to them if he was generous with those who worked less.

Following this, Jesus makes His two statements, that the first shall be the last and the last shall be first, and that many are called but few are chosen.

What do either of these statements have to do with the point of the parable?

The Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard is not about Eternal Life

First of all, it is important to realize that this parable is not about how God makes a general call to everyone to receive eternal life, but then specially selects and chooses some to actually receive it. Such an idea is found nowhere in the parable of the workers in the vineyard and cannot be taught in any way, shape, or form from this story.

In fact, the story teaches the exact opposite. When the landowner goes to the marketplace to hire workers, He hires everyone who is there. He does this all day long, going back at the third, sixth, ninth, and eleventh hours to see if any more workers have shown up. He hires all who are there. We do not see the owner making a general calling to see if anyone wants to work, and when nobody does, he goes around specially selecting some.

No, the text pretty clearly indicates that every time the owner goes out to hire workers, he hires all the workers that he finds. The point of the parable is not that the owner calls all but selects only some; the point is the exact opposite: that he treats all equally.

many are called few are chosenBut if the equal treatment of all by God is the point of this parable, why doesnโ€™t Jesus say something to that effect in Mathew 20:16?

The reason is because Jesus is not exactly summarizing the parable, but is instead responding to the unspoken objection that most people have to this parable.

Matthew 20:16 is Jesus’ response to Objections

And what is that objection? When the vineyard owner pays those who worked only one hour the same amount that he paid those who worked all day, the natural human response is, โ€œBut thatโ€™s not fair!โ€

While we agree that itโ€™s fine for the owner to be generous with those who worked only an hour, we think that if he was going to be both genera and fair, then he should also be generous to those who worked all day. Sure, they got paid what they agreed to, but if the owner is going to be generous, he should be generous to all. Itโ€™s only fair.

You see, in human ways of thinking, fairness trumps generosity. Itโ€™s okay to be generous, if you are generous equally to all.

But in Godโ€™s way of living, the values are reversed. God values both fairness and generosity, but in the Kingdom of God, generosity trumps fairness.

Godโ€™s way of acting toward others seems terribly unfair at times because He decides to be generous, loving, forgiving, gracious, and merciful to those who didnโ€™t earn it, work for it, or deserve it.

When we cry out for justice, God cries out for forgiveness. When we remind people of their duty, God seeks to show them love. When we demand that people be held responsible, God extends more grace.

If any human business operated the way God runs His business, it would be bankrupt within a month. God hires those He shouldnโ€™t, pays more than He can afford, and gives away all His merchandise for free.

This is what Jesus means in the first part of Matthew 20:16.

When He says โ€œthe last will be first, and the first last,โ€ He is saying that those who are winners in the worlds eyes, turn out to be losers in Godโ€™s. Those who have it all figured out about getting ahead in this life, are way behind in Godโ€™s life. From the worldโ€™s perspective, Godโ€™s way of doing things is upside down and backwards. But Jesus is saying that once we step back and see things the way they really are, we discover that God has been right-side-up all the time, and it is we who are all turned around.

The First Shall be Last and the Last Shall be First

Jesusโ€™ first statement in Matthew 20:16 is a statement about reversals. God does not work the way the world works. The Kingdom of God is upside down when compared to the rules and ways of men.

It is not โ€œfairโ€ according to worldly standards that those who enter last end up on equal footing of those who entered first. But that is how it works in Godโ€™s world. Yes, this is not โ€œfair,โ€ but it is generous. And in Godโ€™s world, generosity comes before fairness.

There are a wide variety of applications that this sort of truth might take in the life of the believer. Some among them include how we view those with money, position, power, prestige, and popularity. Though these may be โ€œfirstโ€ in the eyes of most, Godโ€™s eyes cannot look away from the underpaid but humble janitor in the back of the room. When all is said and done, and we stand in line to receive our โ€œdenariusโ€ in heaven, many will be shocked to discover that we all stand equally before God.

I appreciate that it may be hard for some to come to terms with this, but in the light of the most basic and central Christian gospel, the message and achievement of Jesus and the preaching of Paul and the others, there is no reason whatever to say, for instance, that Peter or Paul, James or John, or even, dare I say, the mother of Jesus herself, is more advanced, closer to God, or has achieved more spiritual โ€˜growthโ€™, than the Christians who were killed for their faith last week or last year. Remember the workers in the vineyard (Matthew 20:1-16). Those who worked all day thought they would be paid more, but those who came at the last hour were paid just the same. Is the vineyard owner not allowed to do what he likes with his own? Are we going to grumble because he is so wonderfully generous? (Wright, For All the Saints?,ย 27).

But the parable of the workers in the vineyard does not speak only to the equality we all share before God in the afterlife. The parable also speaks to the way we participate with God in this life.

Yes, all are on equal footing before God. And yet, inexplicably, some seem to have a greater role and purpose than others in Godโ€™s plan for this world. If the unspoken objection to the parable was โ€œBut thatโ€™s not fair!โ€ then the unspoken objection to this statement is, โ€œBut thatโ€™s not how God works!โ€

God isnโ€™t equal to all, even in His own Kingdom. Some are given greater blessings and honors than others. To this second objection, Jesus says, โ€œMany are called, but few are chosen.โ€

Many are Called, but Few are Chosen

This second statement is not a contradiction of the first, but a qualification.

It explains why God, who values generosity over fairness, appears to be more generous to some than others. And this too, relies upon the reversals that become evident when comparing the Kingdom of God with the kingdoms of men. In the human world, bigger is better; more is best.

In Godโ€™s world, it is the opposite: smaller is better; less is best.

God calls and invites everyone to participate with Him in what is going on in the world, and in some ways, every person does play a part.

But in Godโ€™s way of working, He often selects and chooses a few individuals for special purposes and tasks.

And what are these special purposes and tasks for which God chooses some? To serve, suffer, and die.

Godโ€™s โ€œchoosingโ€ is not a choice to honor, position, and power, but to suffering and service. There is no teaching here about an election until eternal life of some. Instead, Jesus is teaching that God is generous to all, and while all are called to serve Him, true service to God is not an easy thing to bear, which is why most donโ€™t want it. Yet God does choose some to serve Him in these difficult ways.

God’s Choosing is to Service

That this is exactly what Jesus means is indicated by the following sections of Matthew 20.

First, in Matthew 20:17-19, Jesus shows what it means to be chosen by God, for Jesus Himself has been chosen. What for? To be betrayed and condemned to death. He will be given over to the Gentiles to be mocked, beaten, and crucified. This is not usually what people think of when they speak of being โ€œchosenโ€ by God, and yet this is the sort of thing that happens to those who are โ€œchosenโ€ in Godโ€™s economy.

It is being chosen to service, suffering, and death (1 Peter 2:21).

The disciples donโ€™t quite get the connection, for they, like all of us, still look at things from the worldโ€™s perspective, and so think that being โ€œchosenโ€ by God refers to receiving special blessings, honor, privilege, and power.

So, in Matthew 20:20-24, two of the disciples get their mother to go ask Jesus if He will choose them to sit on His right and His left when He enters into His Kingdom. The other disciples are indignant when they hear about this, for they themselves wanted to be chosen for this special honor. Jesus, however, rebukes them all and says that this is not what it means to be given positions of greatness in Godโ€™s Kingdom. Those who are great will be last, will serve others, and will give their life for others (Matthew 20:26-28).

Though lots of people interpret Jesusโ€™ words to mean that if someone wants to be great they must begin by serving others and then God will raise them up and make them great, this is not what Jesus is saying at all. Thatโ€™s how โ€œgreatnessโ€ works in the human world. Those who are respected and revered started at the bottom and worked their way to the top. But in Godโ€™s economy, those who are great either go in the opposite direction, or simply stay at the bottom their entire lives.

Those who are โ€œfirstโ€ in Godโ€™s economy work are found at the bottom of the pecking order. The winners of โ€œthe race set before usโ€ are last in the rat race.

chosen3

Summary of the truth in Matthew 20:16

So Matthew 20:16 contains two general principles about how the Kingdom of God works. Both principles emphasize the reversals that are inherent within the Kingdom of God.

These two general principles of the Kingdom of God are that God values generosity more than fairness, and ย that those who are chosen for โ€œgreatnessโ€ in Godโ€™s Kingdom are chosen for service, suffering, and death, which is why not all are chosen.

From our human perspective, these principles seem backwards and upside down. In human society, we boast about equality and fairness while living lives of extreme inequality, thinking that those who are at the top deserve to be there. In Jesusโ€™ economy, those who are at the top of the human world may actually be at the bottom in His, and those at the bottom may actually be at the top.

Furthermore, though God calls all to serve Him in His Kingdom, it is not the sort of service that has us all jumping up and down and waving our arms while we cry out โ€œPick me! Pick me!โ€ No, Godโ€™s choosing is to a life of service, suffering, and death. God chooses only those who are willing to walk that hard road.

In Matthew 20:16, Jesus is saying that it is we who are upside down and backwards, and if we let Him, He will turn our world right way around for us so that we can see the truth and beauty that is Godโ€™s Kingdom.

But it will not come without pain and hardship, as well as a complete reversal of our worldly value system.

If you want to read more about Calvinism, check out other posts in this blog series: Words of Calvinism and the Word of God.

God is z Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, called, Calvinism, chosen, election, Matthew 20:16, Theology of Salvation, TULIP, Unconditional Election

This is what theology debates are sometimes like

By Jeremy Myers
22 Comments

This is what theology debates are sometimes like

Calvinism-and-Arminianism-Paradox

One group only sees the picture on the left and says, “It’s a square!”

Another group only sees the picture on the right and says, “No, it’s a circle!”

The truth, of course, is that it is both and neither. It is neither a square nor a circle; it is a cylinder, but depending on one’s perspective, it can appear to be a square or a circle.

The trick, of course, is backing up far enough so that we can see the cylinder…

It takes time, and sometimes it requires complete separation from all the traditions and rituals that keep us focusing on either the square or the circle.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Theology - General, theology debates

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • …
  • 243
  • Next Page »
Join the discipleship group
Learn about the gospel and how to share it

Take my new course:

The Gospel According to Scripture
Best Books Every Christian Should Read
Study Scripture with me
Subscribe to my Podcast on iTunes
Subscribe to my Podcast on Amazon

Do you like my blog?
Try one of my books:

Click the image below to see what books are available.

Books by Jeremy Myers

Theological Study Archives

  • Theology – General
  • Theology Introduction
  • Theology of the Bible
  • Theology of God
  • Theology of Man
  • Theology of Sin
  • Theology of Jesus
  • Theology of Salvation
  • Theology of the Holy Spirit
  • Theology of the Church
  • Theology of Angels
  • Theology of the End Times
  • Theology Q&A

Bible Study Archives

  • Bible Studies on Genesis
  • Bible Studies on Esther
  • Bible Studies on Psalms
  • Bible Studies on Jonah
  • Bible Studies on Matthew
  • Bible Studies on Luke
  • Bible Studies on Romans
  • Bible Studies on Ephesians
  • Miscellaneous Bible Studies

Advertise or Donate

  • Advertise on RedeemingGod.com
  • Donate to Jeremy Myers

Search (and you Shall Find)

Get Books by Jeremy Myers

Books by Jeremy Myers

Schedule Jeremy for an interview

Click here to Contact Me!

© 2025 Redeeming God · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Knownhost and the Genesis Framework