Redeeming God

Liberating you from bad ideas about God

Learn the MOST ESSENTIAL truths for following Jesus.

Get FREE articles and audio teachings in my discipleship emails!


  • Join Us!
  • Scripture
  • Theology
  • My Books
  • About
  • Discipleship
  • Courses
    • What is Hell?
    • Skeleton Church
    • The Gospel According to Scripture
    • The Gospel Dictionary
    • The Re-Justification of God
    • What is Prayer?
    • Adventures in Fishing for Men
    • What are the Spiritual Gifts?
    • How to Study the Bible
    • Courses FAQ
  • Forum
    • Introduce Yourself
    • Old Testament
    • New Testament
    • Theology Questions
    • Life & Ministry

Psalm 143:2 does not teach Total Inability

By Jeremy Myers
2 Comments

Psalm 143:2 does not teach Total Inability

Sometimes verses like Psalm 143:2 are referenced by Calvinists to defend their doctrine of Total Depravity.

Do not enter into judgment with Your servant, For in Your sight no one living is righteous (Psalm 143:2)

all are guilty - Psalm 143:2There are other verses throughout the Bible that say similar things. But there is a vast difference between Total Depravity as defined by the Calvinist and not being righteous in God’s sight.

It is a biblical fact that no one is righteous before God. We are all sinners (Romans 3:23). We have all done what is wrong. No one has the positive righteousness of God, and no one can do enough good works or become holy enough in order to attain this infinite righteousness. This lack of righteousness is all that passages like Psalm 143:2 are teaching.

In and of ourselves, we have no merit, nor any basis on which to stand to gain favor with God. But this does not mean that we cannot believe in Jesus for eternal life, or cannot accept the good gift of God’s grace when it is offered to us. Such an acceptance of God’s gift is non-meritorious, and to the contrary, is based upon the fact of us not having any merit.

So we can affirm the truth of passages like Psalm 143:2, that before God there is no one who is righteous, without having to add to this core biblical idea the unbiblical concept of total inability.

If you want to read more about Calvinism, check out other posts in this blog series: Words of Calvinism and the Word of God.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, Psalm 143:2, sin, Theology of Salvation, Theology of Sin, Total Depravity, total inability, TULIP

Advertisement

Are People Born in Sin? (Psalm 51:5)

By Jeremy Myers
31 Comments

Are People Born in Sin? (Psalm 51:5)

Psalm 51:5 is often used to defend the idea that humans are sinners before they are born.

Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me (Psalm 51:5)

In his commentary on this text, John Calvin wrote that this proves that David was a transgressor before he ever saw the light of the world (Calvin, Calvin’s Commentaries, Psalms v2: 290).

in sin my mother conceived me Psalm 51:5

This sort of idea is then used to prove that people are totally depraved, even from conception, not because of what they do but because depravity is part of who we are.

There are, however, several other ways of understanding this statement of David in Psalm 51:5.

Born in Sin = Learn to Sin

First, David could be saying that since he was born as a human, he learned to sin, in the same way that infants and toddlers learn to talk. It is not uncommon for the Biblical authors to speak of being “born into” something in just this way.

For example, Acts 2:8 refers to people who were born into a language, but clearly, they were not born already knowing this language, but had to learn it just like everyone else. If this is how to understand Psalm 51:5, David is saying that since he was born in sin, he learned to sin just like everyone else.

Born in Sin = Born in a Sinful World

Second, it could be argued that what David meant was that he was born into a world of sin. The phrases “in iniquity” and “in sin” would thus be understood as metonymy for “a world full of sin.” Metonymy, where a word or phrase is used in place of a different word or phrase with which it is associated, is frequently used in Scripture, and even in modern everyday speech (e.g., “the White House” is often used to refer to the President of the United States, his staff, and the decisions and policy that come from them).

So in the case of Psalm 51:5, David could be referring to the world of sin in which he was conceived and subsequently born.

Born in Sin = Poetic Exaggeration

born in sin Psalm 51 5Third, we could simply say that Psalm 51:5 is poetic hyperbole. David is, after all, confessing his sin of committing adultery with Bathsheba, and so in the midst of this confession, he my seek to exaggerate his own sinfulness by saying that he has always been sinning, even from conception.

The Psalms are full of such exaggeration, as are the rest of Scriptures. In one place, the Psalmist writes that he drowns his bed with a single tear (Psalm 6:6; the Hebrew word for “tears” is singular), and even Paul writes that he is the chief of sinners (1 Timothy 1:15).

Even today, people often use hyperbole in exactly the same way. It is not uncommon to hear a child who misses several problems on a math test to cry out in despair, “I never get any problems right!” In reality, they get most of the problems right most of the time, and in fact, got most of the problems right on that very test. So this is a possible explanation for David’s statement as well.

Born in Sin = David’s Mother Was Accused of Adultery

One final possibility is based on a traditional Jewish reading of Psalm 69.

According to various Jewish historical writings, David’s father and brothers thought that David’s mother, Nizbeth, had committed adultery and borne him out of wedlock (See my post yesterday on David’s Mother Nizbeth for more on this).

They thought David was a bastard (the word “stranger” in Psalm 69:8 has the same Hebrew root as muzar, meaning “bastard”). The truly guilty one was David’s father, Jesse, who, as a result of having Moabite blood (from Ruth) and due to some strange twists of Jewish law, believed that his marriage to Nizbeth was illegitimate and stopped having sexual relations with her to keep her from sinning. Yet he also feared that his seven sons were illegitimate, and so he had sought to gain a legitimate heir for himself by sleeping with his wife’s maidservant (Yes, it sounds strange, but you have to understand Jewish law for it to make sense).

Anyway, Nizbeth’s maidservant loved her mistress dearly, and so switched places with her before Jesse entered her bed, much like Leah and Rachel had switched places so many years before on Jacob’s wedding night. So Jesse ended up sleeping with his wife, even though he thought it was his wife’s servant. Nizbeth became pregnant, but never told her family how she had become pregnant, because she wanted to protect Jesse from public shame. The result, however, was that Jesse, their seven sons, and the entire community came to believe that Nizbeth was an adulterer. The town urged Jesse to stone his wife for adultery, but out of love for her, he refused, and several months later, David was born.

So David grew up in a family in which he was despised, rejected, shunned, and outcast. He was treated with scorn and derision (Psalm 69:7-8). The community followed the example of the family, and assumed that David was full of sin and guilt (Psalm 69:11-12). If something turned up missing, they believed he stole it, and forced him to replace it (Psalm 69:4). He was often the object of jokes and pranks, filling his plate with gall and his cup with vinegar (Psalm 69:20-21).

There are numerous other details to this story, but the point for our purposes here is that this may be what David is referring to in Psalm 51:5. If this Jewish history is true (and we have no good reason to believe otherwise), then almost everybody—including David’s own father and brothers—believed that David was born as a result of adultery, which is why David writes, “I was brought forth in iniquity; and in sin my mother conceived me.”

What does Psalm 51:5 mean?

No matter which of the views above we adopt, the view that is most unlikely is the Calvinistic idea that David is making some sort of theological statement in Psalm 51:5 about the universal total depravity of all humans.

This sort of theologizing was not David’s intention and it does not fit the context of the chapter. There are numerous other explanations for this verse which make much better sense of the verse itself and the context as a whole.

If you want to read more about Calvinism, check out other posts in this blog series: Words of Calvinism and the Word of God.

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, Psalm 51:5, Psalm 69, sin, Theology of Salvation, Theology of Sin, Total Depravity, total inability, TULIP

Advertisement

Words of Calvinism and the Word of God

By Jeremy Myers
52 Comments

Words of Calvinism and the Word of God

TULIP

As with much of what I write on this blog, my current blog series on Calvinism will eventually become a book. I have decided to call this book The Words of Calvinism and the Word of God. To make sure you get a free PDF of this book when it comes out, please request to get updates from me using one of the forms on this site.

Until then, I will try to update this page with the current list of blog posts on Calvinism. Please note that even though you will be able to read much of the content of this book using the links below, the final version of the book will be altered and updated to reflect additional research and any changes I might want to make to the posts based on the feedback and comments I receive on each individual post.

In other words, please read through the posts and leave comments! I value your input and learn from your suggestions — even if it is just to point out a typographical mistake!

So here are the posts in this series on Calvinism so far:

Introduction to Calvinsim

  • I believe in the Five Solas of the Reformation
  • My Personal History with Calvinism
  • A Brief History of John Calvin
  • A Brief Summary of Calvinism
  • A Summary of Calvinism from Calvinists
  • Calvinism’s TULIP by any other name still doesn’t smell as sweet

Calvinism and the Dictionary

  • Faith
    • What is Faith?
    • Are there Degrees of Faith?
    • Faith is not a Gift; Faith is not a Work
  • Gospel
    • What is the Gospel?
    • Jesus is the Gospel; Calvinism is Not
    • It’s impossible to believe the entire Gospel
  • Salvation
    • It’s possible to believe in Jesus but not be saved
    • I hope I get saved as I write this post (and you get saved reading it)
    • Salvation Confusion
  • Forgiveness – Two Kinds of Forgiveness: One is free; one is conditional
  • Repentance – Repentance is not a condition for eternal life
  • Eternal Life
    • Words that Do Not Refer to Eternal Life: Salvation and the Kingdom of Heaven
    • Words that Do Not Refer to Eternal Life: Inheritance and Reward
    • Words that Do Not Refer to Eternal Life: Justification, Sanctification, and Glorification
  • Grace
    • Scandalous, Outrageous, Shocking Grace
    • Grace is absolutely Free
    • Romans 6:1 as a Litmus Test for Grace
  • Calvinism and the NIV
  • 3 Tactics Calvinists Use Against Non-Calvinists

Total Depravity

  • Total Depravity According to Calvinists
    • Total Depravity as Total Inability
    • Do Humans Have Free Will? Calvinism Says No.
    • Dead in Sin: A Favorite Calvinistic Analogy
    • Is Faith a Work?
    • Is Faith a Gift from God?
    • Does Regeneration Precede Faith?
  • Total Depravity according to Scripture
    • Calvinism and Genesis 6:5
    • Genesis 6:6 and Genesis 8:21 do not teach Total Depravity
    • Are People Born in Sin? (Psalm 51:5)
    • Psalm 143:2 does not teach Total Inability
    • Does Ecclesiastes 7:20, 29 teach Total Depravity?
    • Isaiah 53:6 and Isaiah 64:6 Do Not Teach Total Depravity
    • Does Jeremiah 17:9 teach Total Depravity?
    • John 3:3 Does Not Teach Total Inability
    • John 6:44 is a key text for Total Depravity. Too bad it doesn’t teach it…
    • John 8:43 does not teach total inability
    • John 15:4-5 Does Not Teach Total Inability
    • Is Paul teaching Calvinism in Romans 3:10-12?
    • Paul Does Not Teach Total Depravity in Romans 3
    • Humans have three parts: Body, Soul, and Spirit
    • Romans 7: Did Paul Struggle with Sinful Flesh?
    • Romans 8:7-8, Enmity with God, and Calvinism
    • Can the Unbeliever Understand the Things of God? (1 Corinthians 2:14)
    • Removing the Veil from the Gospel – 2 Corinthians 4:3-4
    • 7 Uses of the word “Dead” in the New Testament
    • What does it mean to be dead in sin? Ephesians 2:1-3
    • The Secret Logic Behind Total Depravity
    • Is faith the gift of God in Ephesians 2:8-9?
    • Are All Gentiles Depraved in the Mind? (Ephesians 4:17-19)
    • If Judaizers are Right, then they’re Wrong (Titus 1:15)
    • Is the World Controlled by the Devil? 1 John 5:19
    • Why 1 John 5:1 does not teach that regeneration precedes faith
  • The Last Word on Total Depravity
    • What I believe about Total Inability
    • What I believe about Free Will
    • What it means to be Dead in Sin
    • Faith is NOT a Work
    • Faith is NOT a Gift from God
    • Regeneration Follows Faith
    • You Can Believe!

Unconditional Election

  • Unconditional Election According to Calvinists
    • The U in TULIP – Unconditional Election
    • Unconditional Election Quotes from Calvinists
    • Calvinist Quotes on Reprobation
  • Unconditional Election According to Scripture
    • Israel is God’s Chosen Nation … but what does that mean?
    • Jesus is the Elect One
    • The Church is an Elect People
    • Some Surprising Truths about God’s So-Called “Election” of Abram in Genesis 12:1-3
    • More Coming Soon!
  • The Last Word on Unconditional Election
    • Coming Soon!

Limited Atonement

  • Posts Coming Soon!

Irresistible Grace

  • Posts Coming Soon!

Perseverance of the Saints

  • Posts Coming Soon!

The Sovereignty of God

  • Posts Coming Soon!

 

God is Featured Bible & Theology Topics: books, Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, Theology of Salvation, TULIP, word of god

Advertisement

Calvinism’s TULIP by any other name… still doesn’t smell very sweet

By Jeremy Myers
9 Comments

Calvinism’s TULIP by any other name… still doesn’t smell very sweet

It is important to know before embarking on a serious study of Calvinism that Calvinism goes by various names.

Sometimes it is called “The Doctrines of Grace” and other times it is referred to as “Reformed Theology.”

Reformed Theology

This sort of terminology reveals, in my opinion, the pride and arrogance of some Calvinists,for despite the claims of some Calvinists, many people who are not Calvinists still believe in grace, and not all the Reformers were Calvinistic.

Calvinists also like to claim that Calvinism is equivalent to the gospel, and that there is no such thing as biblical Christianity that is not Calvinistic. All I can do is shake my head at such statements…

Anyway, you should know that if you hear people talking about “the Doctrines of Grace” or “Reformed Theology” they are probably referring to Calvinism.

Nevertheless, I believe it is inaccurate for Calvinists to attempt to appropriate the words “grace” and “reformed” for their own system of theology, especially when, in my opinion, many Calvinists know less of grace than their opponents, and numerous others have stopped seeking further theological reformation.

Though I am not a Calvinist, I hold to radical, outrageous, scandalous grace (a grace which is more gracious than the grace of many Calvinists), and I believe that as fallen and sinful human beings, we should always be about the work of reforming ourselves and our theology and never consider ourselves fully reformed.

So despite the tendency of some to refer to Calvinism as “The Doctrines of Grace” or “Reformed Theology,” I reject both titles as misleading and inaccurate.

doctrines of grace

In the posts that follow I hope to show that while I am not a Calvinist, I stand fully within the Reformation emphases of grace, faith, Jesus Christ, Scripture, and the glory of God.

Though I have sometimes joked that I am a two-and-a-half point Calvinist, it is only because I hold to half of each point of Calvinism, which is really no Calvinism at all.

I believe in depravity, but not total depravity.
I believe in election, but not unconditional election.
I believe in the atonement, but not limited atonement.
I believe in grace, but not irresistible grace.
I believe we are saints, but not in the perseverance of the saints.

God is z Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, Doctrines of Grace, grace, Reformed Theology, Theology of Salvation, TULIP

Advertisement

A Summary of Calvinism from Calvinists

By Jeremy Myers
16 Comments

A Summary of Calvinism from Calvinists

calvinismYesterday I tried to summarize Calvinism with my own words. This is always a dangerous task. In the book I am currently writing on Calvinism, I will always seek to let Calvinists present their views in their own words.

So, as a way of appeasing any critics of my personal summary of five-point Calvinism yesterday, I thought I would post a Calvinistic summary today.

Here is what David N. Steele, Curtis C. Thomas, and S. Lance Quinn have written in their book The Five Points of Calvinism:

Because of the Fall, man is unable of himself to savingly believe the gospel. The sinner is dead, blind, and deaf to the things of God; his heart is deceitful and desperately corrupt. His will is not free; it is in bondage to his evil nature. Therefore, he will not—indeed, he cannot—choose good over evil in the spiritual realm. Consequently, it takes much more than the Spirit’s assistance to bring a sinner to Christ. It takes regeneration, by which the Spirit makes the sinner alive and gives him a new nature. Faith is not something man contributes to salvation, but is itself a part of God’s gift of salvation. It is God’s gift to the sinner, not the sinner’s gift to God.

God’s choice of certain individuals for salvation before the foundation of the world rested solely on His own sovereign will. His choice of particular sinners was not based on any forseen response or obedience on their part, such as faith, repentance, etc. On the contrary, God gives faith and repentance to each individual whom He selected. These acts are the result, not the cause, of God’s choice. Election, therefore, was not determined by, or conditioned upon, any virtuous quality or act forseen in man. Those whom God sovereignly elected He brings through the power of the Spirit to a willing acceptance of Christ. Thus, God’s choice of the sinner, not the sinner’s choice of Christ, is the ultimate cause of salvation.

Christ’s redeeming work was intended to save the elect only and actually secured salvation for them. His death was a substiutionary endurance of the penalty of sin in the place of certain specified sinners. In addition to putting away the sins of His people, Christ’s redemption secured everything necessary for their salvation, including faith, which unites them to Him. The gift of faith is infallibly applied by the Spirit to all for whom Christ died, thereby guaranteeing their salvation.

In addition to the outward general call to salvation, which is made to everyone who hears the gospel, the Holy Spirit extends to the elect a special inward call that inevitably brings them to salvation. The external call (which is made to all without distinction) can be, and often is, rejected. However, the internal call (which is made only to the elect) cannot be rejected; it always results in conversion. By means of this special call, the Spirit irresistibly draws sinners to Christ. He is not limited to His work of applying salvation by man’s will, nor is He dependent upon man’s cooperation for success. The Spirit graciously causes the elect sinner to cooperate, to believe, to repent, to come freely and willingly to Christ. God’s grace, therefore, is invincible; it never fails to result in the salvation of those to whom it is extended.

All who are chosen by God, redeemed by Christ, and given faith by the Spirit, are eternally saved. They are kept in faith by the power of almighty God, and thus persevere to the end (The Five Points of Calvinism, pp 5-8).

Other Calvinists might summarize the Five Points of Calvinism somewhat differently, but this summary from three leading Calvinists is fairly typical.

Calvinism 5 point TULIP

However, here is one super succinct summary, from leading Calvinistic pastor and author, John MacArthur:

(1) Sinners are utterly helpless to redeem themselves or to contribute anything meritorious toward their own salvation (Rom. 8:7-8). (2) God is sovereign in the exercise of His saving will (Eph 1:4-5). (3) Christ died as a substitute who bore the full weight of God’s wrath on behalf of His people, and His atoning work alone is efficacious for their salvation (Isa 53:5). (4) God’s saving purpose cannot be thwarted (John 6:37), meaning none of Christ’s true sheep will ever be lost (John 10:27-29). That is because (5) God assures the perseverance of His elect (Jude 24; Phil 1:6; 1 Peter 1:5).  

As you read over these summaries, you may not see anything that stands out as overly objectionable. You might think that based on the statements above, Calvinism sounds pretty reasonable, and quite biblical.

Yes, that is one of the strengths of Calvinism.

Yet as we look at each of the Five Points in more detail in subsequent posts, we will make room for other Calvinistic voices to be heard as well, and as we look at the biblical passages they use to defend their theology, we will see that Calvinism may not be as reasonable or biblical as it first appears.

If you are a Calvinist, do you think the summaries above are fair? What would you clarify? If you are not a Calvinist, or are just learning about Calvinism, what are your thoughts so far?

God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism, John MacArthur, Theology of Salvation, TULIP

Advertisement

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • Next Page »
Join the discipleship group
Learn about the gospel and how to share it

Take my new course:

The Gospel According to Scripture
Best Books Every Christian Should Read
Study Scripture with me
Subscribe to my Podcast on iTunes
Subscribe to my Podcast on Amazon

Do you like my blog?
Try one of my books:

Click the image below to see what books are available.

Books by Jeremy Myers

Theological Study Archives

  • Theology – General
  • Theology Introduction
  • Theology of the Bible
  • Theology of God
  • Theology of Man
  • Theology of Sin
  • Theology of Jesus
  • Theology of Salvation
  • Theology of the Holy Spirit
  • Theology of the Church
  • Theology of Angels
  • Theology of the End Times
  • Theology Q&A

Bible Study Archives

  • Bible Studies on Genesis
  • Bible Studies on Esther
  • Bible Studies on Psalms
  • Bible Studies on Jonah
  • Bible Studies on Matthew
  • Bible Studies on Luke
  • Bible Studies on Romans
  • Bible Studies on Ephesians
  • Miscellaneous Bible Studies

Advertise or Donate

  • Advertise on RedeemingGod.com
  • Donate to Jeremy Myers

Search (and you Shall Find)

Get Books by Jeremy Myers

Books by Jeremy Myers

Schedule Jeremy for an interview

Click here to Contact Me!

© 2025 Redeeming God · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Knownhost and the Genesis Framework